Gefitinib or Docetaxel as Second Line Therapy for Wild-type Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) NSCLC
A Phase Ⅱ Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Gefitinib With Docetaxel as Second-line Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Non-squamous NSCLC Patients With Wild-type EGFR
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gefitinib, the first EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in the world was examined as monotherapy in two phase Ⅱ studies called IDEAL trials. Response rate with doses of 250mg and 500mg/day were similar, ranging from 10% to 18%. Posterior analysis demonstrated that patients with EGFR mutation had an improved response rate (RR) to gefitinib compared to wild-type patients (46% versus 10%). The early trials that evaluated EGFR-TKIs for the second- and third-line settings of advanced NSCLC did not select patients on the basis of any EGFR marker. The IEESSA Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer (ISEL) trial evaluated the role of second-line gefitinib 250mg/day in 1692 patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients with EGFR mutations had higher RR than patients without (37.5% versus 2.6%). From the above results, the response rate in patients without EGFR gene mutation was obviously different (10% versus 2.6%). The methods used for detecting EGFR gene mutation was different, which might contribute to the difference of response rates. In IDEAL trial, EGFR gene mutation was detected by sequencing. But in ISEL trial, EGFR gene mutation was detected by ARMS. As we know, ARMS was more sensitive than sequencing in detecting EGFR gene mutation. That is to say, in IDEAL trials some EGFR mutant patients were misdiagnosed as wild-type patients, so the response rate was higher. Recently, Wu Yi-Long et al reported that relative abundance of EGFR mutations predicted benefit form gefitinib treatment for advanced non small cell lung cancer. The study cohort was all Chinese. In this study, the objective response rate in patients without EGFR mutation detected by ARMS was 16.1%, which was significantly higher than the response rate of docetaxel. But in 2012 American society of clinical oncology (ASCO) annual meeting, the Tailor study in which Italian NSCLC patients were enrolled demonstrated a clear superiority of docetaxel over erlotinib as second line treatment for patients without EGFR mutations in exons 19 or 21. So we wonder if the racial difference is the determinant factor. So the purpose of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of gefitinib with docetaxel as second-line therapy for advanced or metastatic Chinese NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer
Started Dec 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 nonsmall-cell-lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 17, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedDecember 24, 2012
December 1, 2012
1 year
December 17, 2012
December 19, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression free survival
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 52 weeks.
up to 52 weeks (about one year)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Overall survival
Up to 100 weeks
Objective response rate
up to 9 weeks
the score of functional assessment of cancer treatment-lung (FACT-L)
up to 100 weeks
Number of participants with adverse events
Up to 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Gefitinib
EXPERIMENTALGefitinib (Iressa) 250mg once per day until progression disease or intolerant side effects
Docetaxel
ACTIVE COMPARATORDocetaxel 75mg/m2,d1,every 3 weeks, at least 2-6 cycles depending on the progression disease or the patient's physical condition
Interventions
Gefitinib 250mg once per day until the progression disease or intolerant side effects
Docetaxel 75mg/m2 iv, d1,every 3 weeks, at least 2-6 cycles depending on the progression disease or the patient's physical condition
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age more than 18 years old
- Life expectancy more than 12 weeks
- histologically or cytologically confirmed inoperable non-squamous NSCLC (stage ⅢB/Ⅳ)
- ineligible for curative radiotherapy
- no prior radiotherapy for the target lesions
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0-2
- previous treatment include first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy
- no EGFR gene mutation detected by Scorpions-ARMS
- at least one bidimensionally measurable or radiographically assessable lesion
- adequate bone marrow reserve
- adequate hepatic and renal function
You may not qualify if:
- prior treatments including any of the following drugs: gefitinib and docetaxel
- additional malignancies
- uncontrolled systemic disease
- any evidence of clinically active interstitial lung disease
- newly diagnosed central nervous system (CNS)metastasis and not treated by radiotherapy of surgery
- pregnancy or breast feeding phase
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospita
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Related Publications (10)
Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, Mattson K, Gralla R, O'Rourke M, Levitan N, Gressot L, Vincent M, Burkes R, Coughlin S, Kim Y, Berille J. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(10):2095-103. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.10.2095.
PMID: 10811675RESULTFossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, Crawford J, Natale RR, Dunphy F, Kalman L, Miller V, Lee JS, Moore M, Gandara D, Karp D, Vokes E, Kris M, Kim Y, Gamza F, Hammershaimb L. Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jun;18(12):2354-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.12.2354.
PMID: 10856094RESULTHanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, Pereira JR, De Marinis F, von Pawel J, Gatzemeier U, Tsao TC, Pless M, Muller T, Lim HL, Desch C, Szondy K, Gervais R, Shaharyar, Manegold C, Paul S, Paoletti P, Einhorn L, Bunn PA Jr. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004 May 1;22(9):1589-97. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.163.
PMID: 15117980RESULTCufer T, Vrdoljak E, Gaafar R, Erensoy I, Pemberton K; SIGN Study Group. Phase II, open-label, randomized study (SIGN) of single-agent gefitinib (IRESSA) or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIb or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2006 Apr;17(4):401-9. doi: 10.1097/01.cad.0000203381.99490.ab.
PMID: 16549997RESULTFukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G, Tamura T, Nakagawa K, Douillard JY, Nishiwaki Y, Vansteenkiste J, Kudoh S, Rischin D, Eek R, Horai T, Noda K, Takata I, Smit E, Averbuch S, Macleod A, Feyereislova A, Dong RP, Baselga J. Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected]. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2237-46. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.10.038. Epub 2003 May 14.
PMID: 12748244RESULTKris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS, Lynch TJ Jr, Prager D, Belani CP, Schiller JH, Kelly K, Spiridonidis H, Sandler A, Albain KS, Cella D, Wolf MK, Averbuch SD, Ochs JJ, Kay AC. Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2149-58. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2149.
PMID: 14570950RESULTBell DW, Lynch TJ, Haserlat SM, Harris PL, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, Sgroi DC, Muir B, Riemenschneider MJ, Iacona RB, Krebs AD, Johnson DH, Giaccone G, Herbst RS, Manegold C, Fukuoka M, Kris MG, Baselga J, Ochs JS, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and gene amplification in non-small-cell lung cancer: molecular analysis of the IDEAL/INTACT gefitinib trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):8081-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.7078. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
PMID: 16204011RESULTShepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabarbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050753.
PMID: 16014882RESULTThatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, von Pawel J, Thongprasert S, Tan EH, Pemberton K, Archer V, Carroll K. Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer). Lancet. 2005 Oct 29-Nov 4;366(9496):1527-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67625-8.
PMID: 16257339RESULTHirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA Jr, Franklin WA, Dziadziuszko R, Thatcher N, Chang A, Parikh P, Pereira JR, Ciuleanu T, von Pawel J, Watkins C, Flannery A, Ellison G, Donald E, Knight L, Parums D, Botwood N, Holloway B. Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib in a phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Nov 1;24(31):5034-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.3958.
PMID: 17075123RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mengzhao Wang, MD
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2012
First Posted
December 24, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
December 24, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12