Attain Performa(TM) Quadripolar Lead Study
1 other identifier
interventional
1,202
25 countries
114
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Medtronic Attain Performa Quadripolar Leads (Model 4298, 4398, and 4598) during and post the implant procedure. This study will also assess the interactions of the Attain Performa leads with the entire Medtronic CRT-D system.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Dec 2012
114 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 3, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 5, 2016
CompletedDecember 5, 2016
October 1, 2016
2.2 years
December 3, 2012
February 29, 2016
October 12, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Lead Complication-free Rate at 6 Months
The three Attain Performa LV leads models are evaluated separately. The primary safety objective is listed as following: \- Model 4298/4398: The Attain Performa Model 4298/4398 lead will be considered safe if the probability of subjects freed of Attain Performa lead-related complications at 6 months post-implant is greater than 87% (i.e., the one-sided 97.5% lower confidence bound must be greater than 87%). \- Model 4598: The safety performance of the Attain Performa Model 4598 lead will be characterized by summarizing the probability of subjects who are free from Attain Performa LV lead related complications at 6 months. The lower boundaries of the 97.5% confidence intervals for the all lead models are greater than the pacing threshold of 87%, thus concluding that the crtiera was met for all lead models.
Implant to 6 months post-implant
LV Pacing Capture Thresholds Per Attain Performa Lead Model
6 months post-implant
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percentage of Subjects With Presence of PNS in All LV Lead Pacing Polarities
6 months post-implant
Percentage of Subjects With Successful Implant Per Attain Performa Lead Model
Implant up to 1-month post implant
Rate of Overall Acceptable Lead Handling Per Attain Performa Lead Model
Implant up to 1-month post implant
Pacing Capture Thresholds at the Final Programmed Pacing Polarity
6 months post-implant
Implant Related Times Per Attain Performa Lead Model
Implant up to 1-month post implant
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Attain Performa LV Lead (Models 4298, 4398, 4598)
EXPERIMENTALN/A: single arm study, separate analysis for each lead model (total of 3).
Interventions
Implant and follow-up of study lead, separate analysis for each lead model
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient is indicated for implant of a CRT-D device and left-heart lead per local indications (In US only this is based on Class I and II indications for CRT-D implant per HRS/ACC/AHA guidelines)
- Patient (or legally authorized representative) has signed and dated the study-specific Consent Form
- Patient is 18 years of age or older, or is of legal age to give informed consent per local and national law
- Patient is expected to remain available for follow-up visits
- Patient understands the study and agrees to comply with study protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Patient has a previous LV lead implanted or previous implant attempt within 30 days of enrollment or has ongoing AEs from a previous unsuccessful implant attempt
- Patient has contraindications for standard transvenous cardiac pacing (e.g., mechanical right heart valve)
- Patient has had a heart transplant (Note: Patients waiting for heart transplants are allowed in the study)
- Patient is contraindicated for \< 1 mg dexamethasone acetate
- Patient is currently enrolled or planning to participate in a potentially confounding drug or device study during the course of this study. (Note: Co-enrollment in concurrent studies may be allowed provided that documented pre-approval is obtained from Medtronic's study manager)
- Patient has a life expectancy less than 180 days
- In US, women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test 7 days prior to implant to be included
- Patient is unable to tolerate an urgent thoracotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (121)
Unknown Facility
Glendale, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Riverside, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Jose, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Standford, California, United States
Unknown Facility
West Hollywood, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlantis, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Boca Raton, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Edgewood, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Houma, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Rockville, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Lansing, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
Unknown Facility
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Henderson, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Medford, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Plano, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Temple, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Fairfax, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Chermside, Queensland, Australia
Unknown Facility
Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Unknown Facility
Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Graz, Austria
Unknown Facility
Linz, Austria
Unknown Facility
Genk, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Yvoir, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Canada
Unknown Facility
London, Canada
Unknown Facility
Montreal, Canada
Unknown Facility
Newmarket, Canada
Unknown Facility
Québec, Canada
Unknown Facility
Santiago, Chile
Unknown Facility
Århus N, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Copenhagen, Denmark
Unknown Facility
Helsinki, Finland
Unknown Facility
Nantes, France
Unknown Facility
Rennes, France
Unknown Facility
Rouen, France
Unknown Facility
Bad Rothenfelde, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bernau, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bielefeld, Germany
Unknown Facility
Chemnitz, Germany
Unknown Facility
Heidelberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Trier, Germany
Unknown Facility
Athens, Greece
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gurgaon, Haryana, India
Unknown Facility
Dehli, India
Unknown Facility
Ashkelon, Israel
Unknown Facility
Bologna, Italy
Unknown Facility
Cefalù, Italy
Unknown Facility
Rovigo, Italy
Unknown Facility
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Maastricht, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
Unknown Facility
Bergen, Norway
Unknown Facility
Bucharest, Romania
Unknown Facility
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Unknown Facility
Belgrade, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Kamenitz, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Niš, Serbia
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Košice, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Ljublijana, Slovenia
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Lausanne, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Bournemouth, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Shelby Li
- Organization
- Medtronic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 3, 2012
First Posted
December 17, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2015
Study Completion
February 1, 2015
Last Updated
December 5, 2016
Results First Posted
December 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10