CURES: The Effect of Deep Curarisation and Reversal With Sugammadex on Surgical Conditions and Perioperative Morbidity
CURES
Effect of Deep Curarisation and Reversal With Sugammadex on Surgical Conditions and Perioperative Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Surgery
3 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate if a deep neuromuscular block with a continuous infusion of rocuronium titrated to a post-tetanic count (PTC) of 1-2 responses combined with reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex results in improved surgical conditions for the surgeon and/or improved post-operative respiratory function for the patients as compared to a standard technique with an intubation dose of rocuronium and top-ups as needed to maintain a neuromuscular blockade with a train of four (TOF) count of 1-2 and reversal of neuromuscular blockade with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. Furthermore, we want to investigate the effect of pneumoperitoneum, and NMB with rocuronium and reversal with sugammadex or neostigmine/glycopyrrolate on cerebral tissue oxygenation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 obesity
Started Apr 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 6, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 12, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 3, 2017
CompletedAugust 3, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.8 years
December 6, 2012
March 13, 2017
April 24, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Subjective Evaluation of the View on the Operating Field by the Surgeon
At the end of surgery, the view on the operating field will be graded by the surgeon using a 5-point rating scale: 1. Extremely poor 2. Poor 3. Acceptable 4. Good 5. Optimal
Participants will be followed for the duration of the laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, an expected average of 1.5h
Number of Intra-abdominal Pressure Rises > 18cmH2O
The number of intra-abdominal pressure rises \> 18cmH2O detected by the intra-abdominal CO2 insufflator.
Participants will be followed for the duration of the laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, an expected average of 1.5h
Duration of Surgery
Measured from the time of first skin incision to completion of skin closure.
Participants will be followed for the duration of the laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery, an expected average of 1.5h
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Peak Expiratory Flow
Measured the day before surgery and 30min after completion of surgery (when the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale is 5 (Patient responds readily to name spoken in normal tone))
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second
Measured the day before surgery and 30min after completion of surgery (when the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale is 5 (Patient responds readily to name spoken in normal tone))
Forced Vital Capacity
Measured the day before surgery and 30min after completion of surgery (when the modified observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale is 5 (Patient responds readily to name spoken in normal tone))
Study Arms (2)
Deep neuromuscular blockade, reversal with sugammadex
EXPERIMENTALa continuous rocuronium infusion (0.6mg/kg (lean body mass)/h,) is started and titrated to a post tetanic count of 1-2 twitches. At the end of surgery neuromuscular blockade will be reversed with Sugammadex 4mg/kg. Patients are extubated when the train of four ratio is \> 0.9.
normal neuromuscular blockade, reversal with neostigmine
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter induction of anesthesia, top-ups of rocuronium (10mg) are given as needed to maintain a train of four count of 1-2. At the end of surgery neuromuscular blockade will be reversed with neostigmine 50μg/kg and glycopyrrolate 10μg/kg (lean body mass). Patients are extubated when TOF ratio \> 0.9.
Interventions
after induction of anesthesia, a rocuronium infusion (0.6mg/kg (lean body mass)/h,) is started and titrated to a post tetanic count of 1-2 twitches. At the end of surgery neuromuscular blockade will be reversed with sugammadex 4mg/kg. Patients are extubated when TOF ratio \> 0.9.
After induction of anesthesia, top-ups of rocuronium (10mg) are given as needed to maintain a train of four count of 1-2. At the end of surgery neuromuscular blockade will be reversed with neostigmine 50μg/kg and glycopyrrolate 10μg/kg (lean body mass). Patients are extubated when the train of four ratio is \> 0.9.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Able to give written informed consent
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists class I, II or III
- Obese or morbid obese as defined by BMI \> 30 and \>40 kg/m2 respectively
You may not qualify if:
- Neuromuscular disorders
- Allergies to, or contraindication for muscle relaxants, neuromuscular reversing agents, anaesthetics, narcotics
- Malignant hyperthermia
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Renal insufficiency defined as serum creatinine of 2x the upper normal limit, glomerular filtration rate \< 60ml/min, urine output of \< 0.5ml/kg/h for at least 6h
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD classification 2 or higher.
- Clinical, radiographic or laboratory findings suggesting upper or lower airway infection
- Congestive heart failure.
- Pickwick syndrome
- Psychiatric illness inhibiting cooperation with study protocol or possibly obscuring results
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburglead
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Genk, Limburg, 3600, Belgium
Related Publications (15)
Ali HH, Wilson RS, Savarese JJ, Kitz RJ. The effect of tubocurarine on indirectly elicited train-of-four muscle response and respiratory measurements in humans. Br J Anaesth. 1975 May;47(5):570-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/47.5.570.
PMID: 1138775BACKGROUNDEikermann M, Groeben H, Husing J, Peters J. Accelerometry of adductor pollicis muscle predicts recovery of respiratory function from neuromuscular blockade. Anesthesiology. 2003 Jun;98(6):1333-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200306000-00006.
PMID: 12766640BACKGROUNDBerg H, Roed J, Viby-Mogensen J, Mortensen CR, Engbaek J, Skovgaard LT, Krintel JJ. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997 Oct;41(9):1095-1103. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04851.x.
PMID: 9366929BACKGROUNDSundman E, Witt H, Olsson R, Ekberg O, Kuylenstierna R, Eriksson LI. The incidence and mechanisms of pharyngeal and upper esophageal dysfunction in partially paralyzed humans: pharyngeal videoradiography and simultaneous manometry after atracurium. Anesthesiology. 2000 Apr;92(4):977-84. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00014.
PMID: 10754616BACKGROUNDMurphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268.
PMID: 18635478BACKGROUNDEriksson LI. Reduced hypoxic chemosensitivity in partially paralysed man. A new property of muscle relaxants? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 May;40(5):520-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04482.x.
PMID: 8792879BACKGROUNDWyon N, Joensen H, Yamamoto Y, Lindahl SG, Eriksson LI. Carotid body chemoreceptor function is impaired by vecuronium during hypoxia. Anesthesiology. 1998 Dec;89(6):1471-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199812000-00025.
PMID: 9856722BACKGROUNDPratt CI. Bronchospasm after neostigmine. Anaesthesia. 1988 Mar;43(3):248. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb05560.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 3364648BACKGROUNDPayne JP, Hughes R, Al Azawi S. Neuromuscular blockade by neostigmine in anaesthetized man. Br J Anaesth. 1980 Jan;52(1):69-76. doi: 10.1093/bja/52.1.69.
PMID: 7378232BACKGROUNDGallagher SF, Haines KL, Osterlund LG, Mullen M, Downs JB. Postoperative hypoxemia: common, undetected, and unsuspected after bariatric surgery. J Surg Res. 2010 Apr;159(2):622-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.09.003. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
PMID: 20006346BACKGROUNDSaliman JA, Benditt JO, Flum DR, Oelschlager BK, Dellinger EP, Goss CH. Pulmonary function in the morbidly obese. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 Sep-Oct;4(5):632-9; discussion 639. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.06.010. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
PMID: 18722823BACKGROUNDPuhringer FK, Rex C, Sielenkamper AW, Claudius C, Larsen PB, Prins ME, Eikermann M, Khuenl-Brady KS. Reversal of profound, high-dose rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade by sugammadex at two different time points: an international, multicenter, randomized, dose-finding, safety assessor-blinded, phase II trial. Anesthesiology. 2008 Aug;109(2):188-97. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31817f5bc7.
PMID: 18648227BACKGROUNDEikermann M, Zaremba S, Malhotra A, Jordan AS, Rosow C, Chamberlin NL. Neostigmine but not sugammadex impairs upper airway dilator muscle activity and breathing. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Sep;101(3):344-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen176. Epub 2008 Jun 16.
PMID: 18559352BACKGROUNDCohen LB, Delegge MH, Aisenberg J, Brill JV, Inadomi JM, Kochman ML, Piorkowski JD Jr; AGA Institute. AGA Institute review of endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterology. 2007 Aug;133(2):675-701. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.06.002. No abstract available.
PMID: 17681185BACKGROUNDMiller MR, Dickinson SA, Hitchings DJ. The accuracy of portable peak flow meters. Thorax. 1992 Nov;47(11):904-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.11.904.
PMID: 1465746BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Pascal Vanelderen
- Organization
- Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Pieter De Vooght, M.D.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- STUDY CHAIR
Jeroen Van Melkebeek, M.D.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- STUDY CHAIR
Dimitri Dylst, M.D.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- STUDY CHAIR
Maud Beran, M.D.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- STUDY CHAIR
Margot Vander Laenen, M.D.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- STUDY CHAIR
Jan Van Zundert, M.D., PhD.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- STUDY CHAIR
René Heylen, M.D., PhD.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
- STUDY CHAIR
Hans Verhelst, M.D.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 6, 2012
First Posted
December 12, 2012
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2015
Study Completion
January 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 3, 2017
Results First Posted
August 3, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04