An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Dual Focus Soft Contact Lenses in Slowing Mypoia Progression
A Multicentre Dispensing Clinical Evaluation of MiSight® Lenses
1 other identifier
interventional
144
4 countries
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a new type of soft contact lens with a unique optical design (dual focus) is effective at slowing the progression of myopia (near-sightedness) in children.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 24, 2020
CompletedFebruary 24, 2020
February 1, 2020
4.5 years
November 14, 2012
December 19, 2019
February 11, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Change in Refractive Error Relative to Baseline
Mean change in refractive error, measured with cycloplegic auto-refraction in Diopters at 12 months, relative to baseline.
12 months
Change in Refractive Error Relative to Baseline
Mean change in refractive error, measured with cycloplegic auto-refraction in Diopters at 24 months, relative to baseline.
24 months
Change in Refractive Error Relative to Baseline
Mean change in refractive error, measured with cycloplegic auto-refraction in Diopters at 36 months, relative to baseline.
36 months
Change in Axial Length Relative to Baseline
Mean change in axial length measurement, in millimeters at 12 months, relative to baseline.
12 months
Change in Axial Length Relative to Baseline
Mean change in axial length measurement, in millimeters at 24 months, relative to baseline.
24 months
Change in Axial Length Relative to Baseline
Mean change in axial length measurement, in millimeters at 36 months, relative to baseline.
36 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of Participants With Biomicroscopic Findings Greater Than Grade 2
Baseline
Number of Participants With Biomicroscopic Findings Greater Than Grade 2
12 months
Number of Participants With Biomicroscopic Findings
24 months
Number of Participants With Biomicroscopic Findings Greater Than Grade 2.
36 months
Incidence of Adverse Events
12 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Dual Focus Soft Contact Lens
EXPERIMENTALDual Focus Soft Contact Lens
Single Vision Soft Contact Lens
PLACEBO COMPARATORSingle Vision Soft Contact Lens
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be between 8 and 12 years of age inclusive.
- Best-corrected visual acuity by manifest refraction of +0.10 logMAR.
- Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error between -0.75 and -4.00 D
- inclusive astigmatism: \< -0.75 D and anisometropia: \< 1.00 D
- Possess wearable and visually functional eyeglasses.
- Agree to wear the assigned contact lenses for a minimum of 10 hours per day, - at least 6 days per week, for the duration of the 3 year study.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has previously or currently wears contact lenses or rigid gas permeable contact lenses, including orthokeratology lenses.
- Subject is currently or within 30 days prior to this study has been an active participant in another clinical study.
- Current or prior use of bifocals, progressive addition lenses, atropine, pirenzepine or ANY other myopia control treatment.
- Regular use of ocular medications (prescription or over-the-counter), artificial tears, or wetting agents.
- Current use of systemic medications which may significantly affect contact lens wear, tear film production, pupil size, accommodation or refractive state.
- A known allergy to fluorescein, benoxinate, proparacaine or tropicamide.
- Strabismus by cover test at far (4 m) or near (40 cm) wearing distance correction.
- Any ocular, systemic or neuro-developmental conditions that could influence refractive development.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CooperVision, Inc.lead
- Visioncare Research Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (4)
University of Waterloo School of Optometry
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
University of Minho Clinical & Experiment Optometry Research Lab
Braga, 4710-057, Portugal
National University of Singapore Faculty of Medicine
Singapore, 117597, Singapore
Aston University Ophthalmic Research Group
Birmingham, B4 7ET, United Kingdom
Related Publications (3)
Chamberlain P, Hammond DS, Bradley A, Arumugam B, Richdale K, McNally J, Hunt C, Young G. Eye growth and myopia progression following cessation of myopia control therapy with a dual-focus soft contact lens. Optom Vis Sci. 2025 May 1;102(5):353-358. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002244. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
PMID: 40132119DERIVEDChamberlain P, Bradley A, Arumugam B, Hammond D, McNally J, Logan NS, Jones D, Ngo C, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Hunt C, Young G. Long-term Effect of Dual-focus Contact Lenses on Myopia Progression in Children: A 6-year Multicenter Clinical Trial. Optom Vis Sci. 2022 Mar 1;99(3):204-212. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001873.
PMID: 35086120DERIVEDChamberlain P, Peixoto-de-Matos SC, Logan NS, Ngo C, Jones D, Young G. A 3-year Randomized Clinical Trial of MiSight Lenses for Myopia Control. Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Aug;96(8):556-567. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001410.
PMID: 31343513DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paul Chamberlain
- Organization
- CooperVision Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
José Manuel González-Méijome
University of Minho
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2012
First Posted
November 20, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2017
Study Completion
May 1, 2019
Last Updated
February 24, 2020
Results First Posted
February 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-02