Busulfan & Melphalan Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and Lenalidomide Maintenance
BuMelMCRN001
A Phase II Study of Busulfan & Melphalan as Conditioning Regimen for ASCT in Patients Who Received Bortezomib Based Induction for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance Until Progression.
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
10
Brief Summary
A number of strategies have been proposed to improve the outcome of ASCT. The three main strategies are to incorporate novel agents into the induction regimen, using maintenance therapy following ASCT and the final strategy is to enhance conditioning regimens. Investigators would like to explore all these three strategies in this study: Investigators propose to take patients who have had standard novel agent (bortezomib) based induction regimens into this study and then use a dose-adjusted combination of busulfan and melphalan as conditioning regimen and finally Investigators would like to incorporate lenalidomide maintenance post ASCT until disease progression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 multiple-myeloma
Started Oct 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_2 multiple-myeloma
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2022
CompletedSeptember 21, 2022
September 1, 2022
8.8 years
August 29, 2012
September 20, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
• Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity at day 100 post ASCT
The conventional immunological markers used to define myeloma disease status have also been a subject of debate recently with some reports suggesting that more accurate disease assessment tools are needed to better decide on management of this disease. One of the most promising assays which is increasingly accepted as a more sensitive indicator of myeloma disease status is the Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) analysis. Therefore, Investigators plan to use MRD analysis as a disease assessment tool throughout this study and will correlate it with conventional myeloma disease assessment tools. Investigators would also like to incorporate a newly developed assay - Heavy lite (HevyLite) Chain assay - which will be done at the same time points as the other disease assessments thereby allowing us to explore the viability of this assay in clinical practice.
day 100 post ASCT
Secondary Outcomes (8)
• To determine the pattern, positivity (in terms of percentages) or negativity of MRD analysis during lenalidomide maintenance.
After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
• To determine the response rate using conventional immunoglobulin and monoclonal protein-based markers at day 100 post ASCT and best response using lenalidomide maintenance.
After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
• To determine the effectiveness of using the HevyLite Chain assay to assess anti-tumour response at day 100 post ASCT and during lenalidomide maintenance
After ASCT at day 100, during maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
• To determine the toxicity of busulfan and melphalan when used as a high-dose conditioning therapy for ASCT.
During conditioning therapy for ASCT. For schema option 1 this will be assessed at days -6, -5, -4, -3 and -2 prior ASCT. For schema option 2 this will be assessed at days -7, -6, -5, -4 and -3 prior ASCT.
• To determine the toxicity of lenalidomide maintenance post busulfan and melphalan conditioning ASCT.
After day 100 post ASCT, during the maintenance therapy every 3 months at month 6, 9 and 12 after ASCT; and thereafter every 6 months until disease progression and at discontinuation.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
BuMel + lenalidomide Maintenance
EXPERIMENTALI.V. Busulfan + I.V. Melphalan for conditioning prior ASCT, followed by Lenalidomide maintenance at day 100 after ASCT.
Interventions
Once daily intravenous (IV) busulfan at a dose of 3.2 mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose for three consecutive days (days -5 to -3), option 1 OR Once daily intravenous (IV) busulfan at a dose of 3.2mg/kg or equivalent pharmacokinetics directed dose for three consecutive days (days -6 to -4), option 2.
I.V. reduced dose of melphalan (140mg/m2) on day -2, followed by an autologous stem cell transplant on day 0 (day -1 will be a rest day) - this is referred to as "Option 1" dosing schema OR I.V. reduced dose of melphalan (140mg/m2) on day -3 followed by autologous stem cell transplant on day 0 (days -2 and -1 will be rest days). This is referred to as "Option 2"
Oral lenalidomide 10mg per day (on all 28 days of a 28 day cycle) for the first three cycles and then escalated to 15 mg daily if clinically appropriate to do so. The lenalidomide maintenance will start on day 100 post ASCT and continue till disease progression.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 75 years, inclusive.
- Study participants must have a diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma requiring systemic therapy and are eligible for the planned ASCT.
- Untreated bone marrow sample was shipped to Princess Margaret Hospital for MRD assay.
- Must have been treated with a velcade-based induction regimen. No limit to the number of cycles of induction.
- Study participants in whom the minimum stem cell dose of 2.0 x 106 cluster of differentiation (CD)34+ cells/kg has been collected.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-2.
- Negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test in all females of child-bearing potential (FOCBP).
- Ability to provide written informed consent prior to initiation of any study-related procedures, and ability, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, to comply with all requirements of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Myeloma progression at any time since starting initial induction therapy for multiple myeloma. Changes to or additions to the existing induction therapy are allowed as long as disease progression has not been confirmed.
- Prior treatment history of ASCT for any medical reason.
- Prior treatment history of high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for any medical reason, not limited to myeloma treatment.
- Prior treatment with busulfan or gemtuzumab ozogamicin for any reason.
- Systemic amyloidosis.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 45% as measured by either multi-gated acquisition scan (MUGA) or echocardiogram (ECHO) performed within 75 days prior to day of busulfan dose. If cyclophosphamide was used for stem cell harvest, an ECHO or MUGA must be done after the stem cell collection and prior to enrollment to confirm adequate cardiac function.
- Uncontrolled arrhythmia or symptomatic cardiac disease at the time of screening.
- Symptomatic pulmonary disease, based on Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) or Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) \< 50% of predicted (corrected for hemoglobin) measured within 75 days prior to day of busulfan dose.
- Aspartate transaminase (AST)/alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 3 x the upper limit of normal (ULN).
- History of elevated total serum bilirubin \>2 mg/dL that had been caused by previous chemotherapy at any point, or total bilirubin \> 2.0 mg/dL at the time of screening with the exception of Gilbert's disease.
- Hepatic synthetic dysfunction evidenced by prolongation of the prothrombin time as International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≥ 2.0 at the time of screening.
- Any previous history of fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, ascites related to portal hypertension, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, and symptomatic biliary disease.
- Prior total body irradiation therapy, or radiation therapy directly applied to the liver.
- Patients with a known history of hepatitis B or hepatitis C should be on appropriate anti-viral therapy. Even so, these cases must be discussed with the sponsor and approval obtained prior to screening.
- Known history of or current HIV infection, or active hepatitis B or c infection or any uncontrolled active infection of any kind at the time busulfan administration.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Health Network, Torontolead
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Canadacollaborator
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.collaborator
- Celgene Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Cross Cancer Institute 11560 University Ave
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G-1Z2, Canada
Vancouver General Hospital, Centennial Pavilion, 6th Floor
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9, Canada
Saint John Regional Hospital, 5DN Research Department, 400 University Ave
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre.
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
London Regional Cancer Program 790 Commissioners Road East
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, 5415, boul. de l'Assomption
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada
Royal Victoria Hospital, MUHC Glen Site, Cedars Cancer Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1, Canada
Saskatoon Cancer Centre 20 Campus Drive
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donna E Reece, MD
University Health Network-Princess Margaret Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2012
First Posted
October 8, 2012
Study Start
October 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 31, 2022
Study Completion
July 31, 2022
Last Updated
September 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Current Study Protocol Amendment # 4 (v. date February 13, 21018), ICF(s), interim CSR have been submitted to the DSMB since the activation of this trial. DSMB meetings occur every 6 months. DSMB letters are provided to participating sites every 6 months after the DSMB meetings have occurred. IPD for correlative studies is provided ad-hoc on individual request for data analysis (i.e. submission of abstracts to conferences).
- Access Criteria
- No additional information will be shared
Un-identified IPD, pertaining to Serious Adverse Events, will be submitted to the DSMB for review. DSMB letters will be provided to the participating sites. Un-identified IPD could also be shared with Sub-investigators conducting correlative studies for this trial; that will be Dr. Suzanne Trudel and Dr. Rodger Tiedemann.