The Effect of a Five Week Electrical Myostimulation Program in Chronic Diseases
Soft-hard Technologies to Assistance and Accessibility in Patients With Chronic Diseases: The Effect of a Five Week Electrical Myostimulation Program.
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients afflicted with Chronic Heart Failure (HF) typically do not maintain stable cardiac function for the remainder of their life and consequently require continuous medical management and intermittent hospital admissions. Several investigations have demonstrated that electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) produces positive physiologic and psychological adaptations in patients with HF. However not all the EMS modalities were been evaluated on this population or not even were tested based on present recognized gold standard clinical parameters after a short period of treatment. The primary aims of the proposed study is to: Determine the effect of a five week home based of three EMS modalities on prognostics markers, perceived quality of life, muscle force and electrical activity in subjects diagnosed with HF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Nov 2012
Typical duration for not_applicable heart-failure
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2015
CompletedJune 10, 2013
September 1, 2012
8 months
September 19, 2012
June 6, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
VE/VCO2 slope
Change from Baseline in VE/VCO2 slope at five and ten weeks post EMS.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Peak VO2
Change from Baseline in Peak VO2 at five and ten weeks post EMS.
VO2 at Ventilatory Threshold
Change from Baseline in VO2 at ventilatory threshold at five and ten weeks post EMS.
Perceived quality of life
Change from Baseline in perceived quality od life at five and ten weeks post EMS.
Muscle force
Change from Baseline in muscle force at five and ten weeks post EMS.
Muscle electrical activity
Change from Baseline in muscle electrical activity at five and ten weeks post EMS.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Functional electrical stimulation
EXPERIMENTALBurst modulated alternating rectified current with a 10 Hz carrier frequency, 400 microsecond pulse duration and 50 Hz bursts
Medium-frequency alternating current
EXPERIMENTALBurst modulated alternating current with a 2500 Hz carrier frequency, 400 microsecond pulse duration and 50 Hz bursts
Burst-modulated alternating current
EXPERIMENTALBurst modulated alternating current with a 4000 Hz carrier frequency, 400 microsecond pulse duration and 50 Hz bursts.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORTraining with the intensity of 5 mA.
Interventions
The subjects will receive stimulation to quadriceps and gastrocnemius for 5 days a week for 1 hour during 5 weeks. Electrical stimulation will be delivered through channel one with one electrode placed over the vastus medialis and the second electrode placed medial and distal to the greater trochanter. The channel two will be place on the gastrocnemius with one electrode positioned over the muscle belly and the second over the musculotendinous junction. The stimulus will be on for 10 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period at the first two weeks. Subsequently, the EMS stimulus will be on for 15 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period. The intensity will be turned up to the maximal tolerable intensity as reported by the subject (10-100 mA) observing muscular contraction.
The subjects will receive stimulation to quadriceps and gastrocnemius for 5 days a week for 1 hour during 5 weeks. Electrical stimulation will be delivered through channel one with one electrode placed over the vastus medialis and the second electrode placed medial and distal to the greater trochanter. The channel two will be place on the gastrocnemius with one electrode positioned over the muscle belly and the second over the musculotendinous junction. The stimulus will be on for 10 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period at the first two weeks. Subsequently, the EMS stimulus will be on for 15 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period. The intensity will be turned up to the maximal tolerable intensity as reported by the subject (10-100 mA) observing muscular contraction.
The subjects will receive stimulation to quadriceps and gastrocnemius for 5 days a week for 1 hour during 5 weeks. Electrical stimulation will be delivered through channel one with one electrode placed over the vastus medialis and the second electrode placed medial and distal to the greater trochanter. The channel two will be place on the gastrocnemius with one electrode positioned over the muscle belly and the second over the musculotendinous junction. The stimulus will be on for 10 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period at the first two weeks. Subsequently, the EMS stimulus will be on for 15 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period. The intensity will be fixed on 5 mA.
The subjects will receive stimulation to quadriceps and gastrocnemius for 5 days a week for 1 hour during 5 weeks. Electrical stimulation will be delivered through channel one with one electrode placed over the vastus medialis and the second electrode placed medial and distal to the greater trochanter. The channel two will be place on the gastrocnemius with one electrode positioned over the muscle belly and the second over the musculotendinous junction. The stimulus will be on for 10 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period at the first two weeks. Subsequently, the EMS stimulus will be on for 15 seconds followed by a 30 second relaxation period. The intensity will be turned up to the maximal tolerable intensity as reported by the subject (10-100 mA) observing muscular contraction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (1) Male or female ≥ 21 and ≤ 80 years of age.
- (2) Current HF symptoms consistent with NYHA class III-IV.
- (3) On stable HF pharmacological therapy for at least one month prior to data collection.
- (4) Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 45% documented within 3 months of enrollment (obtained from subjects medical records).
- (5) No planned elective surgery or pacemaker implantation at the time of study initiation.
- (6) Hgb \> 8.0 within 1 month of enrollment (obtained from subjects medical records).
- (7) Willingness to provide written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- (1) Inability to provide written informed consent.
- (2) Inability to walk on a treadmill.
- (3) Hemodynamically significant valvular heart disease.
- (4) Unstable angina.
- (5) Acute myocardial infarction within the previous 3 months.
- (6) Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
- (7) HF known to be secondary to pericardial disease or uncorrected valvular disease.
- (8) Chronic oxygen therapy.
- (9) Participation in another clinical trial within the past 30 days.
- (10) Participation in a regular exercise within the previous 6 months.
- (11) Previous implantation of a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator.
- (12) Pregnancy.
- (13) Resting systolic blood pressure \> 200 mmHg.
- (14) Failure to demonstrate the ability to operate the EMS unit.
- (15) Failure to be compliant with at least 75% of the EMS training sessions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Brasilia University
Brasília, Federal District, 72220-140, Brazil
Related Publications (4)
Myers J, Gademan M, Brunner K, Kottman W, Boesch C, Dubach P. Effects of high-intensity training on indices of ventilatory efficiency in chronic heart failure. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012 Jan-Feb;32(1):9-16. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182343bdf.
PMID: 22113369BACKGROUNDArena R, Myers J, Aslam SS, Varughese EB, Peberdy MA. Peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope in patients with heart failure: a prognostic comparison. Am Heart J. 2004 Feb;147(2):354-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.07.014.
PMID: 14760336BACKGROUNDMueller C, Scholer A, Laule-Kilian K, Martina B, Schindler C, Buser P, Pfisterer M, Perruchoud AP. Use of B-type natriuretic peptide in the evaluation and management of acute dyspnea. N Engl J Med. 2004 Feb 12;350(7):647-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031681.
PMID: 14960741BACKGROUNDVieira PJ, Chiappa AM, Cipriano G Jr, Umpierre D, Arena R, Chiappa GR. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves clinical and physiological function in COPD patients. Respir Med. 2014 Apr;108(4):609-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
PMID: 24418570DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gerson Cipriano Junior, PhD
University of Brasilia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2012
First Posted
September 28, 2012
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2015
Last Updated
June 10, 2013
Record last verified: 2012-09