Study of the Safety and Efficacy of LCZ696 on Arterial Stiffness in Elderly Patients With Hypertension
A Randomized, Double-blind 52-week Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an LCZ696 Regimen Compared to an Olmesartan Regimen on Arterial Stiffness Through Assessment of Central Blood Pressure in Elderly Patients With Hypertension
2 other identifiers
interventional
454
12 countries
47
Brief Summary
The study examined the efficacy of LCZ696 in comparison to the ARB olmesartan on Central Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure (CASP) and other measures of central hemodynamics and arterial stiffness in elderly patients with an elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) and widened pulse pressure (PP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 hypertension
Started Dec 2012
Typical duration for phase_2 hypertension
47 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 20, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 4, 2016
CompletedMay 4, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.3 years
September 20, 2012
March 31, 2016
March 31, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 12 Weeks
Central aortic blood pressure was derived from peripheral pressure waveforms recorded noninvasively from the brachial artery using a cuff-based device. This technique uses the brachial pressure and a signal processing algorithm to transform brachial signals into central blood pressure (BP) waveforms. When the aortic pressure waveform was derived, key pulse wave analysis (PWA) parameters, such as CASP was calculated by the system software. At the first study visit, the arm with the highest systolic blood pressure (SBP) was used for all subsequent PWA. Brachial PWA measurements were performed on the same arm that the office blood pressures were taken. Two pulse waveform measurements, meeting all quality control criteria were captured at baseline and at week 12 visits.
baseline, 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change From Baseline in Mean Central Pulse (CPP) Pressure
Baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV)
baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Central Aortic Systolic Pressure (CASP) at 52 Weeks
baseline, 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP)
baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks
Change From Baseline in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (msDBP)
baseline, 12 weeks, and 52 weeks
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
LCZ696 (sacubitril/valsartan)
EXPERIMENTALRandomized patients received LCZ696 once daily for four weeks, then they force-titrated to a higher dose at Week 4 and stayed on this dose of LCZ696 once daily for the remainder of the treatment period. At week 12, patients with uncontrolled BP allowed to have amlodipine then hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) added at intervals of 4 weeks from Week 12 up to Week 24. To maintain the double dummy, double-blind design, 2 tablets (LCZ696, its matching placebo) and 1 capsule (olmesartan matching placebo) were given during the entire study.
Olmesartan
ACTIVE COMPARATORRandomized patients received olmesartan once daily for four weeks, then force-titrated to a higher dose at Week 4 and stayed on this dose of olmesartan once daily for the remainder of the treatment period. At week 12, patients with uncontrolled BP allowed to have amlodipine then hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) added at intervals of 4 weeks from Week 12 up to Week 24. To maintain the double dummy, double-blind design, 2 tablets (LCZ696 matching placebo) and 1 capsule (olmesartan) were given during the entire study.
Interventions
hydrochlorothiazide 6.25mg, 12.5mg, or 25 mg tablets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients ≥ 60 years of age.
- Patients with essential hypertension, untreated or currently taking antihypertensive therapy.
- Untreated patients must have an office msSBP ≥150 mmHg and \<180 mmHg at Visit 101 and Visit 201 if they are newly diagnosed or have not been treated with antihypertensive drugs for the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
- Treated patients must have an office msSBP ≥140 mmHg and \<180 mmHg at Visit 102 (or Visit 103) and msSBP ≥150 mmHg and \<180 mmHg at Visit 201 if they have been treated with antihypertensive drugs for the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
- All patients must have pulse pressure \>60 mmHg at Visit 201. Pulse pressure is defined as msSBP- msDBP.
- Patients must have a difference in msSBP within +/-15 mmHg between Visit 201 (randomization) and the visit immediately prior to Visit 201.
You may not qualify if:
- Malignant or severe hypertension (grade 3 of WHO classification; msDBP ≥110 mmHg and/or msSBP ≥ 180 mmHg)
- History of angioedema, drug-related or otherwise.
- History or evidence of a secondary form of hypertension, including but not limited to any of the following: renal parenchymal hypertension, renovascular hypertension (unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis), coarctation of the aorta, primary hyperaldosteronism, Cushing's disease, pheochromocytoma, polycystic kidney disease, and drug-induced hypertension.
- Transient ischemic cerebral attack (TIA) during the 12 months prior to Visit 1 or any history of stroke.
- History of myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery or any percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the 12 months prior to Visit 1.
- History of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter during the 3 months prior to Visit 1, or active atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter on the ECG at screening.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (47)
Novartis Investigative Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60607, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Belzoni, Mississippi, 39038, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39209, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63141, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Buffalo, New York, 14215, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77081, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Lake Jackson, Texas, 77566, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Pasadena, Texas, 77504, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Caba, Buenos Aires, C1440AAD, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, B1704ETD, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000CXH, Argentina
Novartis Investigative Site
Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia
Novartis Investigative Site
Barranquilla, Colombia
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75015, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 10117, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Nuremberg, 90471, Germany
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, Athens, 11525, Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, Athens, 11526, Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, Greece, 54642, Greece
Novartis Investigative Site
Treviglio, BG, 24047, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Pisa, PI, 56126, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
San Daniele del Friuli, UD, 33038, Italy
Novartis Investigative Site
Shimotsuke, Tochigi, 329-0498, Japan
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 101990, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 117198, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 119992, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197341, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Yaroslavl, 150047, Russia
Novartis Investigative Site
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 424-717, South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 110 744, South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41071, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz, 11407, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08025, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Centelles, Catalonia, 08540, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Terrassa, Catalonia, 08221, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
A Coruña, Galicia, 15706, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28034, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, Madrid, 28041, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Port de Sagunt, Valencia, 46520, Spain
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, Taiwan, 40447, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, 114, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, 112, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Williams B, Cockcroft JR, Kario K, Zappe DH, Cardenas P, Hester A, Brunel P, Zhang J. Rationale and study design of the Prospective comparison of Angiotensin Receptor neprilysin inhibitor with Angiotensin receptor blocker MEasuring arterial sTiffness in the eldERly (PARAMETER) study. BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 4;4(2):e004254. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004254.
PMID: 24496699DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Directors
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 20, 2012
First Posted
September 25, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
May 4, 2016
Results First Posted
May 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03