A Study of Ketamine in Patients With Treatment-resistant Depression
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose Frequency Study of Ketamine in Subjects With Treatment-resistant Depression
2 other identifiers
interventional
68
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the optimal dose frequency of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 major-depressive-disorder
Started Aug 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 major-depressive-disorder
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 26, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 6, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 12, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 12, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 5, 2016
CompletedApril 29, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.1 years
June 22, 2012
May 10, 2016
April 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 15
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment. The test consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total score of 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition.
Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 29
Baseline (Day 1) and Day 29
Number of Responders Based on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Day 15 and Day 29
Number of Remitters Based on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Day 15 and Day 29
Number of Sustained Responders Based on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Day 15
Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score From Baseline to Endpoint (Day 29)
Baseline (Day 1) and Endpoint (Day 29)
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Placebo 3 times/week
PLACEBO COMPARATORKetamine 3 times/week
EXPERIMENTALKetamine 2 times/week
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo 2 times/week
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Form= intravenous infusion, route= intravenous (IV) use. IV infusions of placebo 2 times weekly or IV infusions of placebo 3 times weekly.
Type= exact number, unit= mg/kg, number= 0.5, form= intravenous infusion, route= intravenous (IV) use. IV infusions of ketamine 0.50 mg/kg, 2 times weekly or IV infusions of ketamine 0.50 mg/kg, 3 times weekly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be medically stable on the basis of clinical laboratory tests performed at screening
- Meet diagnostic criteria for recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD), without psychotic features
- Have a history of inadequate response, ie treatment was not successful, to at least 1 antidepressant
- Have an Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Clinician rated, 30 item (IDS-C30) total score \>= 40 at screening and predose at Day 1
- Inpatient or agreed to be admitted to the clinic on each dosing day
You may not qualify if:
- Has uncontrolled hypertension
- Has a history of, or current signs and symptoms of diseases, infections or conditions that in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (eg, compromise the well-being) of the patient or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
- Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to ketamine or its excipients
- Is unable to read and understand the consent forms and patient reported outcomes, complete study-related procedures, and/or communicate with the study staff
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Centennial, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Rockville, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Marlton, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Related Publications (2)
Lewis S, Romano C, De Bruecker G, Murrough JW, Shelton R, Singh JB, Jamieson C. Analysis of Clinical Trial Exit Interview Data in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Patient. 2019 Oct;12(5):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00369-8.
PMID: 31270774DERIVEDJohnson KM, Devine JM, Ho KF, Howard KA, Saretsky TL, Jamieson CA. Evidence to Support Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Administration Every 24 Hours to Assess Rapid Onset of Treatment Response. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;77(12):1681-1686. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10253.
PMID: 28086004DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Director, Clinical Research
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2012
First Posted
June 26, 2012
Study Start
August 6, 2012
Primary Completion
September 12, 2013
Study Completion
September 12, 2013
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Results First Posted
August 5, 2016
Record last verified: 2025-04