A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Amisulpride Versus Low-dose Amisulpride Plus Low-dose Sulpiride in the Treatment of Schizophrenia
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Surveys have shown that antipsychotic drug combinations are frequently prescribed. Amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has low incidence of extrapyramidal symptom (EPS) but with high cost compared to sulpiride. The objective of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the 800-mg/d amisulpride and 400-mg/d amisulpride plus 800-mg sulpiride in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia. Method: In this 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study, patients with schizophrenia are randomly assigned to amisulpride (800 mg/d) or amisulpride (400 mg/d) plus sulpiride (800 mg/d).The hypothesis is that the two treatment groups have the similar efficacy and safety, but different cost.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 schizophrenia
Started Jan 2008
Typical duration for phase_4 schizophrenia
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 8, 2012
CompletedMarch 1, 2016
February 1, 2016
3.9 years
June 3, 2012
February 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change from baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores
The PANSS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Secondary Outcomes (5)
changes from baseline in the scores on several psychopathology scales for efficacy
The CGI-S, PANSS, CDSS, and GAF were rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Assessments of safety for extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS)
AIMS, BAS, and SAS were administered at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination)
Assessments of safety for general adverse events
UKU was administered at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination)
Other safety of clinical trial
Body weight, BMI, pulse rate, and blood pressure were checked at baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination). ECG and laboratory tests were assessed at baseline and week 6.
Assessments of quality of life
Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 was assessed at baseline and week 6
Study Arms (2)
sulpiride plus amisulpride
EXPERIMENTALsulpiride 800mg/d + amisulpride 400mg/d
full-dose amisulpride
ACTIVE COMPARATORamisulpride 800mg/d
Interventions
amisulpride 800mg/d
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- schizophrenia
- CGI \>=4
- washout of antipsychotics at least 3-5 days
- written informed consents
You may not qualify if:
- History of serious adverse events to sulpiride or amisulpride
- History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome or tardive dyskinesia to antipsychotics
- treatment-resistant schizophrenia
- long-acting antipsychotics in the past 3 months
- comorbid with substance abuse/dependence
- female subjects with pregnancy
- severe physical illness
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 802, Taiwan
Related Publications (5)
Leucht S, Wahlbeck K, Hamann J, Kissling W. New generation antipsychotics versus low-potency conventional antipsychotics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003 May 10;361(9369):1581-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13306-5.
PMID: 12747876RESULTKapur S, Seeman P. Does fast dissociation from the dopamine d(2) receptor explain the action of atypical antipsychotics?: A new hypothesis. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;158(3):360-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.360.
PMID: 11229973RESULTMcKeage K, Plosker GL. Amisulpride: a review of its use in the management of schizophrenia. CNS Drugs. 2004;18(13):933-56. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200418130-00007.
PMID: 15521794RESULTChakos MH, Glick ID, Miller AL, Hamner MB, Miller DD, Patel JK, Tapp A, Keefe RS, Rosenheck RA. Baseline use of concomitant psychotropic medications to treat schizophrenia in the CATIE trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Aug;57(8):1094-101. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1094.
PMID: 16870959RESULTLin CH, Wang FC, Lin SC, Huang YH, Chen CC, Lane HY. Antipsychotic combination using low-dose antipsychotics is as efficacious and safe as, but cheaper, than optimal-dose monotherapy in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Sep;28(5):267-74. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283633a83.
PMID: 23778382DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ching-Hua Lin, MD, PhD
Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of Adult Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2012
First Posted
June 8, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2011
Study Completion
December 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02