Olanzapine vs. Low-dose Olanzapine Plus Trifluoperazine
A Randomized, Double-blind, Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Olanzapine Versus Low-dose Olanzapine Plus Low-dose Trifluoperazine in the Treatment of Schizophrenia
1 other identifier
interventional
94
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesis is that an antipsychotic drug combination of low-dose olanzapine plus low-dose trifluoperazine is similar to regular-dose olanzapine monotherapy in efficacy and safety for treatment of schizophrenia.The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the olanzapine (10 mg/d) and olanzapine (5 mg/d) plus trifluoperazine (5 mg/d) in the treatment of acute psychotic exacerbations of schizophrenia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 schizophrenia
Started Jan 2012
Typical duration for phase_4 schizophrenia
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2016
CompletedMarch 10, 2016
March 1, 2016
4.1 years
February 27, 2016
March 4, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores from baseline to the end of the study.
The PANSS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
Secondary Outcomes (17)
The changes in the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores from baseline to the end of the study.
The CGI-S was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
The changes in the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) scores from baseline to the end of the study.
The CDSS was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
The changes in the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores from baseline to the end of the study.
The GAF was rated at baseline, and again at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 (or on early termination).
The changes in the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) scores from baseline to week 6.
The SF-36 was rated at baseline and again at week 6.
The changes in the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores from baseline to week 6.
The MMSE was rated at baseline and again at week 6.
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
trifluoperazine plus olanzapine
EXPERIMENTALtrifluoperazine 5mg/day + olanzapine 5mg/day
full-dose olanzapine
ACTIVE COMPARATORolanzapine 10mg/day
Interventions
trifluoperazine 5mg/d
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- were physically healthy and had all laboratory parameters within normal limits
- were aged 18 to 55 years
- satisfied the DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia
- had baseline Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) scale score of 4 or greater
- had no DSM-IV diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (including alcohol)
- had not received depot antipsychotic drugs for the preceding 3 months
- gave written informed consent to participate in the study after a full explanation of the study's aims and procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- those with a history of serious adverse reaction to olanzapine or trifluoperazine or a history of tardive dyskinesia or neuroleptic malignant syndrome
- female subjects who were pregnant or at risk for pregnancy or lactation
- those that had a diagnosis of treatment-resistant schizophrenia or having previously received clozapine or electroconvulsive therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 802, Taiwan
Kai-Suan Psychiatric Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Related Publications (3)
Lin CH, Wang FC, Lin SC, Huang YH, Chen CC, Lane HY. Antipsychotic combination using low-dose antipsychotics is as efficacious and safe as, but cheaper, than optimal-dose monotherapy in the treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Sep;28(5):267-74. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3283633a83.
PMID: 23778382BACKGROUNDLeucht S, Corves C, Arbter D, Engel RR, Li C, Davis JM. Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009 Jan 3;373(9657):31-41. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61764-X. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
PMID: 19058842RESULTLin CH, Kuo CC, Chou LS, Chen YH, Chen CC, Huang KH, Lane HY. A randomized, double-blind comparison of risperidone versus low-dose risperidone plus low-dose haloperidol in treating schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Oct;30(5):518-25. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e3181f28dff.
PMID: 20814315RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ching-Hua Lin, MD, PhD
Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
- STUDY CHAIR
Cheng-Chung Cheng, MD, PhD
Kaohsiung Municipal Kai-Syuan Psychiatric Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief of Adult Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2016
First Posted
March 10, 2016
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2016
Study Completion
February 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 10, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03