Efficacy Study on Cognitive Functions in Schizophrenic Patients
AMIMIND
Comparative Efficacy of Amisulpride vs Risperidone on Cognitive Functions in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia
2 other identifiers
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary objectives
- To compare neurocognitive effects of amisulpride with those of risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia, as assessed by the general cognitive index, a measure of overall cognitive functioning in schizophrenia Secondary objectives
- Secondary analyses will be conducted to determine how the two atypical agents' neurocognitive effects compare with regard to their profile of therapeutic action (based on individual cognitive domain scores in seven cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, reasoning and problem solving and social cognition);
- Investigate whether amisulpride elicits more improvement on negative symptoms compared to risperidone treatment, as measured by the total score on the Scale of the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) 8 and by the Negative Symptom Subscale of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS);
- Assess whether amisulpride improves overall functioning and individual domains of psychotic symptoms compared to risperidone as measured by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and the total and positive and general psychopathology subscale scores of PANSS and by the individual domains of SANS, respectively;
- Evaluate the safety and tolerability of amisulpride and risperidone based on the study completion rates, and frequency of abnormal laboratory values, prolactin serum concentrations and on the Simpson Angus Scale for Extrapyramidal Symptoms (SAS) 10 and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4 schizophrenia
Started Sep 2008
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 schizophrenia
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2010
CompletedDecember 9, 2010
December 1, 2010
1.3 years
September 26, 2008
December 8, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
General cognitive index, as assessed by the overall average z-score based on the neurocognitive test (MATRICS) battery
Day 0, Day 28, Day 56
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Cognitive measures assessed by individual subscales scores in seven cognitive domains
Day 0, Day 28, Day 56
Overall Clinical Effects assessed by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)
Day -21 to -1, Day 0, Day 7, Day 28, Day 56
Clinical symptoms Ratings of psychopathology assessed by the PANSS (positive and negative symptoms, general psychopathology), and the SANS (Attention, Affect, Alogia, asociality/Anhedonia;Avolition)
Day -21 to -1, Day 0, Day 7, Day 28, Day 56
Ratings of potential side affects assessed by the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS)and the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS)
Day 0, Day 7, Day 28, Day 56
General safety/tolerability assessed by vital signs measures, treatment emergent adverse events record, and frequency of abnormal laboratory measures
Day -21 to -1, Day 0, Day 28, Day 56
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis: DSM-IV schizophrenia (any subtype)
- Duration of illness: ≥ 5 years
- Concomitant standing or prn medications (except other antipsychotics and those contraindicated in the respective package inserts \[amisulpride or risperidone\]) are permitted during treatment phase, if they were present at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to the start of initial treatment with study medication
- Overall symptom severity: patients must evidence a total score of 60 or higher on the PANSS scale
- Clinical Symptoms: A score of 4 (moderate) or greater on any of the 7 items of the PANSS Positive Symptom Subscale is present
- Cognitive status (minimum performance level): subject must be able to validly complete the baseline MATRICS assessment
- Clinical judgment by the investigator that treatments with amisulpride or risperidone are warranted due to suboptimal clinical outcome despite previous treatments
You may not qualify if:
- Past or current intolerance of amisulpride or risperidone side effects that are judged by the investigator to be unsafe, dose-limiting, or likely to result in study discontinuation.
- Any contraindication for amisulpride or risperidone therapy as indicated in the drug description.
- Presence of any unstable or untreated medical disorder.
- Any history of seizures or seizure disorder other than febrile seizures of childhood;
- History of positive hepatitis B surface antigen.
- Any abnormal laboratory test that is judged to be clinically significant by the investigator.
- A history of significant head injury/trauma, as defined by:
- A. loss of consciousness (LOC) for more than 1 hour B. recurring seizures resulting from the head injury C. clear cognitive sequelae of the injury D. cognitive rehabilitation following the injury
- Alcohol or substance dependence within the past 12 months or abuse within the past 3 months. Any subject with positive urine toxicology or alcohol use that is considered abnormal at baseline.
- Clinically significant suicidal or homicidal behavior or attempts within past 6 months.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Absence of medically approved contraceptive methods for female of childbearing potential.
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sanofilead
Study Sites (1)
Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office
Budapest, Hungary
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
László Erős, MD
sanofi-aventis Hungary
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2008
First Posted
September 29, 2008
Study Start
September 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 9, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-12