A Phase II Trial of Ridaforolimus and Exemestane, Compared to Ridaforolimus, Dalotuzumab and Exemestane in Participants With Breast Cancer (MK-8669-064)
A Phase II Randomized Trial of the Combination of Ridaforolimus and Exemestane, Compared to Ridaforolimus, Dalotuzumab and Exemestane in High Proliferation, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Patients
3 other identifiers
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of the triplet of ridaforolimus, dalotuzumab and exemestane compared to the combination of ridaforolimus and exemestane in post-menopausal participants with breast cancer. The primary hypothesis of the study is that the triplet of ridaforolimus, dalotuzumab and exemestane will improve progression free survival (PFS) compared to ridaforolimus and exemestane.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jul 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_2
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 4, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 19, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 25, 2019
CompletedMarch 25, 2019
March 1, 2019
1.6 years
May 22, 2012
February 15, 2019
March 21, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1. Progression-free Survival (PFS) According to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)
PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease, or death, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 by BICR. According to RECIST 1.1, progressive disease (PD) was defined as a 20% relative increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the nadir SOD and an absolute increase of \>5 mm in the SOD, or the appearance of new lesions. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and median PFS (95% confidence interval \[CI\]) in weeks was reported for each treatment arm. Per protocol, participants remained on assigned treatment until disease progression. Participants who discontinued study treatment for reasons other than disease progression continued to be assessed by imaging until objective documentation of progression. All participants (including participants who discontinued study treatment) were followed for survival until investigator notification to discontinue.
From Day 1 through last post-study efficacy follow-up (up to ~19 months)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percent Change From Baseline in Sum of Target Lesion Diameters at Week 16
Baseline, Week 16
3. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (Objective Response Rate [ORR]) According to Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) Based on Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR).
From Day 1 through last post-study efficacy follow-up (up to ~19 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
From Day 1 through last post-study efficacy follow-up (up to ~19 months)
Study Arms (2)
Ridaforolimus + Dalotuzumab + Exemestane
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive ridaforolimus 10 mg orally (PO) every 5 days (QD x 5) plus dalotuzumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every week (QW) plus exemestane 25 mg PO every day (QD) in 28-day cycles until documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Ridaforolimus + Exemestane
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants receive ridaforolimus 30 mg PO QD x 5 plus exemestane 25 mg PO QD treatment in 28-day cycles until documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Interventions
Ridaforolimus 10 mg tablet, administered PO at a dose of 10 mg (triplet) or 30 mg (doublet) depending upon randomization, on Days 1-5, 8-12, 15-19, \& 22-26 of 28-day cycle.
Dalotuzumab administered 10 mg/kg IV weekly on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of 28-day cycle.
Exemestane 25 mg tablet administered PO QD.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer that is metastatic or locally advanced (locally advanced tumors must not be amenable to
- surgery or radiation therapy with curative intent) with the following pathological characteristics determined locally: estrogen receptor positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER-2) negative, and Ki67 (a tumor marker) ≥ 15% determined by the central study laboratory
- Post-menopausal
- With advanced breast cancer whose disease was refractory to previous letrozole or anastrozole
- Has at least one confirmed measurable metastatic lesion
- Has a performance status ≤ 1 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scale
- Has a life expectancy of at least 3 months
- Adequate organ function
You may not qualify if:
- Is receiving any other concurrent systemic tumor therapy, including
- hormonal agents and HER-2 inhibitors
- Previously received rapamycin or rapamycin analogs, including
- ridaforolimus, temsirolimus, or everolimus
- Received prior treatment with Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF-1R) inhibitors, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, or
- other experimental agents that target PI3K, Protein Kinase B (AKT), or Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) pathway
- Is receiving chronic corticosteroids administered at doses greater than
- those used for normal replacement therapy
- Has active brain metastasis or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis; patients
- with adequately treated brain metastases are eligible if they meet certain criteria
- Known allergy to macrolide antibiotics
- Has an active infection requiring antibiotics
- Significant or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
- Poorly controlled Type 1 or 2 diabetes
- Is known to be Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Rugo HS, Tredan O, Ro J, Morales SM, Campone M, Musolino A, Afonso N, Ferreira M, Park KH, Cortes J, Tan AR, Blum JL, Eaton L, Gause CK, Wang Z, Im E, Mauro DJ, Jones MB, Denker A, Baselga J. A randomized phase II trial of ridaforolimus, dalotuzumab, and exemestane compared with ridaforolimus and exemestane in patients with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Oct;165(3):601-609. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4375-5. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
PMID: 28681171RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2012
First Posted
May 24, 2012
Study Start
July 4, 2012
Primary Completion
February 19, 2014
Study Completion
March 15, 2018
Last Updated
March 25, 2019
Results First Posted
March 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf