Study Stopped
early termination due to Sponsor decision (slow recruitment)
A Phase Ib/II Study of BYL719 and Cetuximab in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
A Phase Ib Dose Escalation/Randomized Phase II, Multicenter, Open-label Study of BYL719 in Combination With Cetuximab in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
2 other identifiers
interventional
179
9 countries
29
Brief Summary
This was a multi-center, open-label, Phase Ib dose escalation /Phase II study in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) patients considered to be resistant, ineligible or intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy. The Phase Ib included three arms. Three different methods of administration and two different BYL719 formulations were studied to determine the MTD and/or RP2D of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab: Arm A - film-coated whole tablets were orally administered to patients who were able to swallow the tablets; Arm B - a drinkable suspension prepared from crushed film-coated tablets was administered orally to patients with swallowing dysfunction Arm C - a suspension from a dispersible tablet administered via G-tube, in patients with swallowing dysfunction. Arm C was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), compared to Arm A (film coated tablet), and safety of the dispersible tablet of the dispersible tablet formulation of BYL719. The Phase II investigated the clinical efficacy of BYL719 and consisted of an open label, randomized Phase II part investigating BYL719 in combination with cetuximab compared to cetuximab alone in patients resistant or intolerant to platinum and naïve to cetuximab (Scheme 1: Arm 1 and Arm 2), and a non-randomized Phase II part Scheme 2: Arm 3. In addition, patients who experienced disease progression in Arm 2 (cetuximab) were allowed to switch to the combination regimen (cross-over, Arm 2B). The safety of the BYL719 in combination with cetuximab was also further characterized in Arms 1, 2B and 3. Patients were treated until progression of disease), unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever occurred first (except for phase II Arm 2 had the opportunity to crossover to the combination treatment (Arm 2B). In the follow-up period all patients had to complete the safety follow-up assessments within 30 days after the last dose of the study treatment. Patients who did not have disease progression at the time of discontinuation of study treatment were radiologically followed for disease status until disease progression, initiation of subsequent anticancer therapies, or death, whichever occurred first. In addition, all patients enrolled in Phase II were followed for survival.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Nov 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_1
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 12, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 16, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 16, 2016
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 21, 2018
CompletedDecember 29, 2020
April 1, 2018
3.8 years
May 16, 2012
May 8, 2017
December 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Phase Ib Arms A: Probability That Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Rate is in the Recommended Phase 2 Dose in Cycle 1 (Cycle 1=28 Days)
Maximum Tolerated Doses (MTDs) and/or recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) in arm A (BYL719 administered as a whole tablet in patients able to swallow the tablets). Dose recommendation was based on posterior summaries including the mean, median, standard deviation, 95%-credibility interval, and the probability that the true DLT rate for each dose combination lies in one of the following categories: (0%, 16%) under-dosing; (16%, 35%) targeted toxicity; (35%, 100%) excessive toxicity. The combination treatment was considered superior to cetuximab alone if the posterior probability (HR \> 1) \< 10%, and the posterior median HR \< 0.7.
until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (approximately 6 months)
Phase Ib Arm B: Probability That Distribution of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) is in the Recommended Phase 2 Dose in Cycle 1 (Cycle 1=28 Days)
Maximum Tolerated Doses (MTDs) and/or recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) in arm B (crushed film-coated tablets as an oral suspension with swallowing dysfunction). Dose recommendation was based on posterior summaries including the mean, median, standard deviation, 95%-credibility interval, and the probability that the true DLT rate for each dose combination lies in one of the following categories: (0%, 16%) under-dosing; (16%, 35%) targeted toxicity; (35%, 100%) excessive toxicity. The combination treatment was considered superior to cetuximab alone if the posterior probability (HR \> 1) \< 10%, and the posterior median HR \< 0.7.
until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (approximately 6 months)
For Phase Ib: Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 (28 Days)
Estimation of Maximum Tolerated Doses (MTDs) and/or recommended Phase II doses (RP2Ds) of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM HNSCC) in arm A (BYL719 administered as a whole tablet in patients able to swallow the tablets) and arm B (BYL719 administered as a drinkable suspension in patients with swallowing dysfunction). 6 months is an approximate timeframe.
until disease progression or intolerable toxicity (approximately 6 months)
Phase II Arms 1 and 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1 by Central Radiology Review
Assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab vs. cetuximab as single-agent in RM HNSCC patients naive to cetuximab. 6 months is an approximate timeframe.
approximately 6 months
Phase II Arm 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST V1.1
Assessment of the anti-tumor activity of BYL719 in combination with cetuximab in patients resistant to platinum-based therapy and cetuximab.
approximately 6 months
Phase Ib: Area Under Curve (AUC) 0-24 for BYL719 by Treatment
Comparison of single-dose exposure of BYL719 dispersible tablet via G-tube in combination with cetuximab in RM HNSCC to that of Arm A (film-coated tables)
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (22)
Phase II: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v 1.1
approximately 6 months
Phase Ib: Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per RECIST v1.1
approximately 6 months
Phase II: Randomized Best Overall Response as Per RECIST v1.1
approximately 6 months
Phase II: Non-Randomized Best Overall Response as Per RECIST v1.1
approximately 6 months
Phase II: Randomized Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per RECIST v1.1
approximately 6 months
- +17 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (7)
Phase Ib: A-BYL719 FC whole tab+cetux
EXPERIMENTALOral film-coated tablets without swallowing dysfunction.
Phase II: 2-Cetuximab
EXPERIMENTALCetuximab in patients naive to cetuximab (phase ll)
Phase Ib: B-BYL719 FC drink sus+cetux
EXPERIMENTALCrushed film-coated (FC) tablets as an oral suspension with swallowing dysfunction.
Phase II: 3-BYL719 + Cetuximab
EXPERIMENTALBYL719 + cetuximab in patients resistant to cetuximab. BYL719 can be administered as FC whole/crushed only or DT via G-tube in addition, depending on the Phase Ib results
Phase II: 1-BYL719 + Cetuximab
EXPERIMENTALBYL719 + Cetuximab in Patients naive to cetuximab. BYL719 can be administered as FC whole/crushed only or DT via G-tube in addition, depending on the Phase Ib results
Phase Ib: C-BYL719 DT+cetux
EXPERIMENTALDispersible tablet with swallowing dysfunction administered via a gastrostomy tube (G-tube)
Phase II: Cross over
EXPERIMENTALpatients received BYL719 at RP2D in combination with cetuximab.
Interventions
Oral alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor
New formulation of the oral alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor
Recombinant chimeric monoclonal antibody driven against EGFR
Oral alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Patients with histologically/cytologically-confirmed HNSCC
- Patients must be resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy, or be ineligible (due to medical comorbidities) or intolerant to platinum-based therapy per medical history
- For Phase Ib, there is no restriction on the number of prior therapies for recurrent or metastatic disease
- For Phase II, patients may have received a maximum of 1 prior line of therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease
- For Phase Ib, prior cetuximab or other EGFR-targeted antibody therapy is allowed regardless of the prior treatment settings.
- For Phase II, Arms 1 and 2, prior cetuximab or other EGFR-targeted antibody therapy is allowed only if administered in the induction setting, or concurrently with radiation in the curative setting, with the last dose of cetuximab administered at least 12 months prior to starting the study treatment. For Arm 3, prior cetuximab must have been administered in the curative, recurrent or metastatic disease setting and disease progression documented within 9 months of the last dose of cetuximab administered in that setting. This regimen (including both platinum and cetuximab) must be the most recent anti-neoplastic treatment regimen administered.
- Patients with swallowing dysfunction who are unable to swallow BYL719 whole tablets and are not using feeding tubes for study drug administration can participate in the Phase Ib Arm B. For the Phase II, these patients with swallowing dysfunction may participate if able to drink the suspension and results of Arm B confirm the use of this method. Patients with swallowing dysfunction requiring G tube (G/PEG tube) for study drug administration may participate in Phase II if Arm C confirms dispersible tablet via G tube administration is permitted if the administration of drinkable suspension of BYL719 is allowed to be used in Phase II.
- Availability of a representative tumor specimen. Patients enrolled in Arm 3 of Phase II must have disease sites amenable to biopsy unless prior agreement between Novartis and the Investigator.
- At least one measurable or non-measurable lesion as per RECIST 1.1 criteria for patients in Phase Ib; Measurable disease as determined by RECIST v1.1 for Phase II patients
- World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) ≤ 2
- Adequate organ function
- Negative serum pregnancy test.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment with PI3K-inhibitors
- Patients with a prior serious infusion reaction to cetuximab
- Patients with uncontrolled CNS tumor metastatic involvement
- Clinically significant cardiac disease or impaired cardiac function
- Patients with diabetes mellitus
- Impaired GI function or GI disease
- History of another malignancy within 2 years prior to starting study treatment
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (29)
Novartis Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
San Francisco, California, 94101, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10017, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150, Australia
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69373, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulouse, 31059, France
Novartis Investigative Site
Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Novartis Investigative Site
Maastricht, 5800, Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Nijmegen, 6500 HB, Netherlands
Novartis Investigative Site
Singapore, 169610, Singapore
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 03080, South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, Korea, 06351, South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
Novartis Investigative Site
Tainan, Taiwan ROC, 70421, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Kuei-Shan Chiang, Taoyuan/ Taiwan ROC, 33305, Taiwan
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10048, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Razak ARA, Wang HM, Chang JY, Ahn MJ, Munster P, Blumenschein G Jr, Solomon B, Lim DW, Hong RL, Pfister D, Saba NF, Lee SH, van Herpen C, Quadt C, Bootle D, Blumenstein L, Demanse D, Delord JP. A Phase 1b/2 Study of Alpelisib in Combination with Cetuximab in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Target Oncol. 2023 Nov;18(6):853-868. doi: 10.1007/s11523-023-00997-z. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
PMID: 37875771DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Recruitment of new patients who were resistant to both platinum \& cetuximab into Arm 3 was halted due to slow enrollment. The study was terminated early and health authorities were informed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2012
First Posted
May 18, 2012
Study Start
November 12, 2012
Primary Completion
September 16, 2016
Study Completion
September 16, 2016
Last Updated
December 29, 2020
Results First Posted
May 21, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share