Real-world Clinical Efficacy of Abatacept in the T3 Data Registry
Abatacept in T3: A Characterization of Abatacept's Efficacy and Outcomes From a Real-Word Clinical Practice Information Hub on Novel Patient Sub-Groups
2 other identifiers
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Abatacept in real-world clinical practice. The main hypothesis to be examined in this study is, "Abatacept's effectiveness results in a single real-world clinic (n = 100) are reproducible at another site (n \~= 200)".
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2012
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 29, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2016
CompletedNovember 6, 2017
November 1, 2017
4.7 years
February 29, 2012
November 2, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Determine the efficacy of abatacept by analyzing the change in CDAI, DAS28, and RAPID3 scores.
Change from baseline in CDAI, DAS28, and RAPID3 scores at approximately 6 months.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Determine the efficacy of abatacept by analyzing the change in CDAI, DAS28, and RAPID3 scores.
Change from baseline in CDAI, DAS28, and RAPID3 scores at approximately 3 months.
Determine the efficacy of abatacept by analyzing the change in CDAI, DAS28, and RAPID3 scores.
Change from baseline in CDAI, DAS28, and RAPID3 scores at approximately 9 months.
Study Arms (1)
All patients
All patients in T3 who have used Abatacept for at least 3 months between 2009-03-17 and 2011-11-30.
Interventions
As prescribed by a doctor for patient medical care.
Eligibility Criteria
All rheumatoid arthritis patients from a single site who have been on Abatacept for greater than 3 months.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis
- Have used Abatacept for 3 or more months
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Arthritis Northwest PLLClead
- Bristol-Myers Squibbcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Arthritis Northwest
Spokane, Washington, 99208, United States
Related Publications (2)
Michael Schiff, Coralie Poncet, and Manuela Le Bars International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology 2010 5:5, 581-591
BACKGROUNDPincus T, Swearingen CJ, Bergman M, Yazici Y. RAPID3 (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3), a rheumatoid arthritis index without formal joint counts for routine care: proposed severity categories compared to disease activity score and clinical disease activity index categories. J Rheumatol. 2008 Nov;35(11):2136-47. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080182. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
PMID: 18793006BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Keith Knapp, Ph.D.
Arthritis Northwest PLLC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary Craig, M.D.
Arthritis Northwest PLLC
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 29, 2012
First Posted
March 16, 2012
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
November 1, 2016
Study Completion
November 1, 2016
Last Updated
November 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-11