Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients
A Phase II Study of Abatacept Versus Placebo to Assess the Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) in Adult Patients With Undifferentiated Arthritis Who Are at High Risk for the Development of RA
1 other identifier
interventional
56
10 countries
48
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess if Abatacept given for six months will prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients who are at risk for the development of RA in comparison to placebo. High risk patients are defined as those having a positive laboratory test for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP2).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Feb 2005
Typical duration for phase_2
48 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 19, 2009
CompletedApril 7, 2015
March 1, 2015
2.2 years
June 30, 2005
May 21, 2009
March 18, 2015
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) by American Rheumatism Association (ARA) Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
ARA criteria is a 7-item tool for RA classification purposes; a patient is said to have RA (meeting endpoint) if he or she has satisfied at least 4 of the 7 criteria. If a participant discontinued due to lack of efficacy, he/she was regarded as meeting primary endpoint also.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Number of Participants With a Diagnosis of RA by 1987 ARA Criteria and/or Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy
24 months
Number of Participants With Undifferentiated Inflammatory Arthritis (UA) Who Develop Another Rheumatic Disease
12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Radiographic Erosion and Joint Space Narrowing Score at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Change From Baseline in Total Erosion, Edema, Synovitis Scores at 6 Months, 12 Months, and 24 Months
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Number of Participants With Persistent Symptomatic Clinical Synovitis
6, 12, and 24 months
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of undifferentiated arthritis
- Clinical synovitis of two or more joints
- At least one but not more than three of the criteria for diagnosis of RA (1987).
- No prior disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)/biologics.
- Duration of disease must be 18 months or less.
- Positive for antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides.
You may not qualify if:
- Women of child bearing potential who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method to avoid pregnancy.
- Active vasculitis of a major organ system.
- Severe or recurrent bacterial infection.
- History of cancer in the last five years except certain skin cancers.
- Herpes zoster that resolved less than 2 months prior to enrollment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (48)
Local Institution
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Local Institution
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Local Institution
Huntington Beach, California, United States
Local Institution
Los Angeles, California, United States
Local Institution
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Local Institution
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
Local Institution
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Local Institution
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Local Institution
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Local Institution
Cumberland, Maryland, United States
Local Institution
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
Local Institution
Duluth, Minnesota, United States
Local Institution
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Local Institution
Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Austin, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Local Institution
Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Local Institution
Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Local Institution
Malvern, Victoria, Australia
Local Institution
Shenton Park, Western Australia, Australia
Local Institution
Brussels, Belgium
Local Institution
Leuven, Belgium
Local Institution
Paris, France
Local Institution
Strasbourg, France
Local Institution
Berlin, Germany
Local Institution
Dresden, Germany
Local Institution
Hamburg, Germany
Local Institution
Hanover, Germany
Local Institution
Heidelberg, Germany
Local Institution
Bari, Italy
Local Institution
Ferrara, Italy
Local Institution
Milan, Italy
Local Institution
León, Guanajuato, Mexico
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Local Institution
Guadalajara, Mexico City, Mexico
Local Institution
Morelia, Michioacan, Mexico
Local Institution
Ponce, Puerto Rico
Local Institution
A Coruña, Spain
Local Institution
Barcelona, Spain
Local Institution
Madrid, Spain
Local Institution
Oviedo, Spain
Local Institution
Seville, Spain
Local Institution
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Local Institution
Leeds, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Emery P, Durez P, Dougados M, Legerton CW, Becker JC, Vratsanos G, Genant HK, Peterfy C, Mitra P, Overfield S, Qi K, Westhovens R. Impact of T-cell costimulation modulation in patients with undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis or very early rheumatoid arthritis: a clinical and imaging study of abatacept (the ADJUST trial). Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):510-6. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.119016. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
PMID: 19933744BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- BMS Study Director
- Organization
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2005
First Posted
July 28, 2005
Study Start
February 1, 2005
Primary Completion
May 1, 2007
Study Completion
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 7, 2015
Results First Posted
November 19, 2009
Record last verified: 2015-03