NCT01532245

Brief Summary

One method for treating intraoperative hypoxia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is application of PEEP to the dependent lung. However, only a minority of patients benefit from this maneuver. The effect of applied PEEP on oxygenation depends on the relation between the total end-expiratory pressure and the lower inflexion point (LIP) of pressure-volume curve (1). LIP during OLV can be determined with super-syringe technique, but is too complicated for routine operating room use. An alternative is the constant-flow method which is easy and widely used in intensive care settings (2). The investigators goal was to confirm that the constant-flow method as applied by an intensive care ventilator works during OLV. Methods: After IRB approval and written, informed consent, data were obtained from 20 patients during OLV for thoracic surgery who were ventilated with an AVEA (VIASYS Healthcare) critical-care ventilator. During two-lung ventilation (TLV) and OLV 8 ml•kg-1 tidal volume was used. During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O PEEP were alternated. During each period, the investigators recorded arterial blood partial pressures, respiratory and hemodynamic values, intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi), and LIP. PEEPi and LIP were determined using the automatic mode of the ventilator; specifically, LIP was determined with a continuous flow of 3L/minute.

Trial Health

15
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2011

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 2, 2012

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 14, 2012

Completed
6.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 23, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 23, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

October 25, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

6.9 years

First QC Date

February 2, 2012

Last Update Submit

October 23, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during ventillation

    constant-flow method useful for determination of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) during OLV

    10 minutes

  • lower inflexion point (LIP) of P-V curve during one lung ventillation (OLV)

    constant-low method useful for determination of lower inflexion point (LIP) of P-V curve during one lung ventillation (OLV).

    10 minutes

  • net change of Lower Inflexion Point (LIP)- intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) ditstance with PEEP

    Relationship between the net change of lower inflexion point (LIP)- positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) ditstance with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and change of PaO2 is useful during OLV for determination of patients reaction for application extternal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)

    10 minutes

  • net change of lower inflexion point (LIP)-PEEPi ditstance without PEEP

    Relationship between the net change of lower inflexion point (LIP)-intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) ditstance with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and change of PaO2 is useful during one lung ventillation (OLV) for determination of patients reaction for application external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).

    10 minutes

Study Arms (3)

two-lung ventilation (TLV)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During two-lung ventilation (TLV) and OLV 8 ml•kg-1 tidal volume was used.

Other: two lung ventilation (TLV)

one lung ventillation (OLV) without PEEP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated.

Other: one lung ventilation (OLV) without PEEP

one lung ventilation (OLV) with PEEP

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2Opositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated

Other: One lung ventilation (OLV) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)

Interventions

During two-lung ventilation (TLV) and OLV 8 ml•kg-1 tidal volume was used.

two-lung ventilation (TLV)

During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated.

one lung ventillation (OLV) without PEEP

During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated

one lung ventilation (OLV) with PEEP

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • thoracic surgery lung ventillation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

One-Lung Ventilation

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiration, ArtificialAirway ManagementTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Tamás Végh,, M.D.

    Klinikum Ludwigshafen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2012

First Posted

February 14, 2012

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion

October 23, 2018

Study Completion

October 23, 2018

Last Updated

October 25, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10