Study Stopped
No participants
The Use of Constant-flow Technique for Determining the Lower Inflexion Point of Pressure-volume Curve and Intrinsic PEEP During One-lung Ventilation
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
One method for treating intraoperative hypoxia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) is application of PEEP to the dependent lung. However, only a minority of patients benefit from this maneuver. The effect of applied PEEP on oxygenation depends on the relation between the total end-expiratory pressure and the lower inflexion point (LIP) of pressure-volume curve (1). LIP during OLV can be determined with super-syringe technique, but is too complicated for routine operating room use. An alternative is the constant-flow method which is easy and widely used in intensive care settings (2). The investigators goal was to confirm that the constant-flow method as applied by an intensive care ventilator works during OLV. Methods: After IRB approval and written, informed consent, data were obtained from 20 patients during OLV for thoracic surgery who were ventilated with an AVEA (VIASYS Healthcare) critical-care ventilator. During two-lung ventilation (TLV) and OLV 8 ml•kg-1 tidal volume was used. During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O PEEP were alternated. During each period, the investigators recorded arterial blood partial pressures, respiratory and hemodynamic values, intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi), and LIP. PEEPi and LIP were determined using the automatic mode of the ventilator; specifically, LIP was determined with a continuous flow of 3L/minute.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2011
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 23, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 23, 2018
CompletedOctober 25, 2018
October 1, 2018
6.9 years
February 2, 2012
October 23, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during ventillation
constant-flow method useful for determination of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) during OLV
10 minutes
lower inflexion point (LIP) of P-V curve during one lung ventillation (OLV)
constant-low method useful for determination of lower inflexion point (LIP) of P-V curve during one lung ventillation (OLV).
10 minutes
net change of Lower Inflexion Point (LIP)- intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) ditstance with PEEP
Relationship between the net change of lower inflexion point (LIP)- positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) ditstance with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and change of PaO2 is useful during OLV for determination of patients reaction for application extternal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
10 minutes
net change of lower inflexion point (LIP)-PEEPi ditstance without PEEP
Relationship between the net change of lower inflexion point (LIP)-intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) ditstance with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and change of PaO2 is useful during one lung ventillation (OLV) for determination of patients reaction for application external positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).
10 minutes
Study Arms (3)
two-lung ventilation (TLV)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring two-lung ventilation (TLV) and OLV 8 ml•kg-1 tidal volume was used.
one lung ventillation (OLV) without PEEP
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated.
one lung ventilation (OLV) with PEEP
ACTIVE COMPARATORDuring OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2Opositive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated
Interventions
During two-lung ventilation (TLV) and OLV 8 ml•kg-1 tidal volume was used.
During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated.
During OLV, ventilation periods of ten minutes, with and without 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were alternated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- thoracic surgery lung ventillation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tamás Végh,, M.D.
Klinikum Ludwigshafen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2012
First Posted
February 14, 2012
Study Start
December 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 23, 2018
Study Completion
October 23, 2018
Last Updated
October 25, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10