NCT07105293

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effects of two different PEEP levels (5 cmH₂O and 10 cmH₂O) during laparoscopic hysterectomy on perioperative tissue and cerebral oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, and postoperative pulmonary complications.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
64

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 15, 2024

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 25, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 5, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 5, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

June 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Laparoscopic hysterectomyPEEPPostoperative pulmonary complicationsRespiratory mechanicsDriving pressureTissue oxygenation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Intergroup comparison of near infrared spektroscopy (NIRS) value

    Comparison of near infrared spektroscopy (NIRS) values between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg baseline, after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    During the operation

  • Pulmonary Outcomes

    It was determined whether pulmonary complications developed and its relationship with the Ariscat score was evaluated. Ariscat score: Low Risk: 0-26 point Middle Risk: 26-44 point Hihg Risk: 45≤ point

    During the operation

  • Intergroup comparison of peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) value (mmHg)

    Comparison of peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak) values between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    During the operation

  • Intergroup comparison of plato pressure (Ppeak) value (mmhg)

    Comparison of plato pressure (Pplato) values between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    during the operation

  • Intergroup comparison of mean airway pressure (Pmean) value (mmhg)

    Comparison of mean airway pressure (Pmean) values between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    during the operation

  • Intergroup comparison of end tidal carbondioxide (EtCO2) value (mmhg)

    Comparison of end tidal carbondioxide (EtCO2) values between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    during the operations

  • Intergroup comparison of driving pressure value (mmhg)

    Comparison of driving pressure values between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    during the operations

  • Intergroup comparison of partial oxygen pressures (PaO2) (mmhg)

    Comparison of partial oxygen pressures (pao2) in arterial blood gas between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    during the operations

  • Intergroup comparison of partial carbondioxide pressures (PaCO2) (mmhg)

    Comparison of partial carbondioxide pressures (PaCO2) in arterial blood gas between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    during the operations

  • Intergroup comparison of lactate value

    Comparison of lactate values between two groups with PEEP: 5 mmHg and PEEP: 10 mmHg after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum and after insufflation

    during the operation

Study Arms (2)

PEEP 5 cmH2o applied group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A standardized anesthesia protocol involved volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg and a frequency of 10-12 breaths/min. Patients were randomized into two equal groups; one group received PEEP 5 cmH₂O

Other: PEEP 5 cmH2o applied group

PEEP 10 cmH2o applied group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A standardized anesthesia protocol involved volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg and a frequency of 10-12 breaths/min. Patients were randomized into two equal groups; one group received PEEP 10 cmH₂O

Other: PEEP 10 cmH2o applied group

Interventions

A standardized anesthesia protocol involved volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg and a frequency of 10-12 breaths/min, PEEP:5 cmH2o

PEEP 5 cmH2o applied group

A standardized anesthesia protocol involved volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg and a frequency of 10-12 breaths/min, PEEP:10 cmH2o

PEEP 10 cmH2o applied group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The study group included patients aged 18-70 years with ASA physical status I-III who were scheduled for elective laparoscopic hysterectomy under general anesthesia between November 1, 2023 and February 15, 2024 and who gave informed consent for participation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous history of pneumothorax
  • ASA IV classification
  • Significant pulmonary impairment (moderate/severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, pulmonary hypertension, etc.)
  • Active upper respiratory tract infection or recurrent respiratory infections requiring recent antibiotic treatment
  • Severe systemic diseases
  • Heavy smoking (≥20 pack-years)
  • Emergency surgical cases
  • Failure to provide written informed consent for any reason
  • Contraindications to PEEP application

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kartal Dr. Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients were randomized into two equal groups; one group received PEEP 5 cmH₂O, while the other received PEEP 10 cmH₂O.
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Assistant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2025

First Posted

August 5, 2025

Study Start

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion

February 15, 2024

Study Completion

February 1, 2025

Last Updated

August 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations