Predictive Factors of a Successful Implant of the CapsureFix MRI Model 5086
1 other identifier
observational
409
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pacing leads are key elements of a pacing system as their proper functioning is one of the major factors affecting the long term performance of the whole system. Success of a pacing lead implant can be defined considering 3 items: ease of lead implant, lead stability and lead electrical performances. These factors may be related to the physician experience (global implant experience, experience with a given lead), to the implant procedure (lead access, lead position, implant time, scopy time) to the lead (handling and mechanical characteristics) and to the patient (ischemic history). Even though implant success rate is quite high with currently available leads, the weight of the different factors influencing success has never been studied systematically. The objective of the current study is then to define the predictive factors of an implant success with the CapsureFix MRI model 5086. This lead has been selected because it has been available for a short period, so the investigators have a limited experience of it and it has a unique design which makes it conditionally safe in an MRI environment and which may be associated with specific handling characteristics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2011
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 11, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 18, 2020
CompletedJuly 2, 2025
January 1, 2020
2.6 years
January 11, 2012
February 14, 2017
June 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Ease of Implant
Ease of implant as experienced by the implanting physician on maneuverability of the catheter. This was measured by a questionnaire for which each criterion was coded as Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor, Very Poor. Coding 9, 7, 5, 3, 1 was applied for each response with 9 representing Very Good. An average was calculated for each evaluation and for each probe implantation site.
at implant
Lead Stability
Lead stability of the Capsure Fix as measured by number of dislodgments
3 months
Pacing Threshold During and Post Implant of the CapsureFix MRI Lead Model 5086
Change of pacing threshold will be measured during and post implant of the CapsureFix MRI lead model 5086
3 months
Sensing Amplitude During and Post Implant of the CapsureFix MRI Lead Model 5086
Change of sensing amplitude will be measured during and post implant of the CapsureFix MRI Lead Model 5086
3 months
Impedance Measurements During and Post Implant of the CapsureFix MRI Lead Model 5086
Change of impedance will be measured during and post implant of the CapsureFix MRI Lead Model 5086
3 months
Study Arms (1)
Patients implanted with the CapsureFix MRI pacing lead
Patients implanted with the CapsureFix MRI pacing lead model 5086
Interventions
Pacing system implant with the CapsureFix MRI pacing lead model 5086
Eligibility Criteria
Patient implanted with 2 CapsureFix MRI pacing leads model 5086 in the atrium and in the ventricle
You may qualify if:
- Patient older than 18
- Patient implanted with a fully automatic ICD and remotely followed-up,
- Patient geographically stable and able to attend FU at investigative site
- Patient who signed a data release authorization form,
You may not qualify if:
- Patient whose mental or physical capacity impedes to give an informed data release authorization,
- Patient already enrolled in a clinical study whose procedures may interfere with the results of the present study,
- Patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failurelead
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Centre Hospitalier Regionnal d'Orléans La Source
Orléans, 45067, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Foudali Latifa
- Organization
- Medtronic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier BIZEAU, MD
Centre Hospitalier Regionnal d'Orléans La Source
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 11, 2012
First Posted
February 1, 2012
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 2, 2025
Results First Posted
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01