Capecitabine in the Perioperative Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Rektum-III
5-Fluorouracil Versus Capecitabine as Perioperative Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. a Randomized Phase III Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
401
1 country
14
Brief Summary
This study compares capecitabine with standard 5-FU in the perioperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2002
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2011
CompletedNovember 27, 2020
November 1, 2020
9 years
December 21, 2011
November 24, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
5-year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
disease-free survival (DFS)
3-year DFS
Local recurrence rate
5 years
Study Arms (2)
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)
ACTIVE COMPARATORDrug - 5FU based chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy
Capecitabine
EXPERIMENTALDrug - Capecitabine-based radiochemotherapy and chemotherapy
Interventions
Capecitabine standard therapy (i.e. 2,500 mg/sqm) x 5 cycles plus 1 cycle of capecitabine based chemoradiotherapy (1.650 mg/sqm)
4 cycles of bolus 5-FU (500 mg/sqm) and 1 cycle of 5-FU based chemoradiotherapy (either 1,000 mg/sqm/day infusional 5-Fu days 1-5 and 29-33 or 225 mg/sqm/day infusional 5-Fu throughout the time of chemoradiotherapy)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligible patients are 18 years or older and have histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum (defined as the distal border of the tumour less than 16 cm from the anal verge measured by rigid rectoscopy) with no evidence of distant metastases (identified by abdominal ultrasound or CT scan and chest radiography).
- Patients in the adjuvant cohort have undergone R0-resection by total mesorectal excision (TME) of a pT3-4 N any or T any N positive non-metastatic rectal cancer.
- Patients treated in the neoadjuvant cohort need to have a clinical T3-4 N any or T any N positive tumour staged by endoscopic ultrasound, provided the lower border of the tumour is located 0 - 16 cm from the anal verge measured by rigid rectoscopy and the primary tumour is deemed resectable by TME surgery on the basis of clinical assessment. Other eligibility criteria comprise: WHO status of zero or one; adequate liver, renal, and bone marrow function defined as follows: leucocyte count \> 3,500/µl, thrombocyte count \> 100,000/µl, hemoglobin \> 10.0 g/dl; serum bilirubin \< 2.0 mg/dl, serum creatinine \< 2.0 mg/dl.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment for rectal cancer, prior chemo- or immunotherapy, prior pelvic radiotherapy, or a history of other malignant diseases within the past five years with the exception of successfully treated basal carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (14)
Dr Martina Grunewald
Aschersleben, Germany
Dr Hans Walter Lindemann
Hagen, Germany
Prof Hartmut Link
Kaiserslautern, Germany
Dr Elisabeth Fritz
Koblenz, Germany
Dr Stephan Kremers
Lebach, Germany
Dr Lothar Müller
Leer, Germany
Dr Christain Constantin
Lemgo, Germany
Dr Erika Kettner
Magdeburg, Germany
Dr Markus Moehler
Mainz, Germany
Dr Udo Hieber
Mannheim, Germany
Prof Ralf Hofheinz
Mannheim, Germany
Dr Matthias Hipp
Regensburg, Germany
Prof Axel Matzdorff
Saarbrücken, Germany
Dr Stephan Laechelt
Tübingen, Germany
Related Publications (2)
Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Muller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70116-X. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
PMID: 22503032RESULTGarcia-Albeniz X, Gallego R, Hofheinz RD, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Ayuso-Colella JR, Bombi JA, Conill C, Cuatrecasas M, Delgado S, Gines A, Miquel R, Pages M, Pineda E, Pereira V, Sosa A, Reig O, Victoria I, Feliz L, Maria de Lacy A, Castells A, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A, Maurel J. Adjuvant therapy sparing in rectal cancer achieving complete response after chemoradiation. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 14;20(42):15820-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i42.15820.
PMID: 25400468DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ralf Hofheinz, MD
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Germany, University of Heidelberg
- STUDY CHAIR
Frederik Wenz, MD
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Germany, University of Heidelberg
- STUDY CHAIR
Stefan Post, MD
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Germany, University of Heidelberg
- STUDY CHAIR
Andreas Hochhaus, MD
Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Co-Investigator, Head Department of Radiation Oncology Mannheim
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2011
First Posted
December 29, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2002
Primary Completion
March 1, 2011
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 27, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11