NCT01499290

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime Avibactam plus Metronidazole compared to Meropenem for treating hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
493

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2012

Geographic Reach
20 countries

56 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 19, 2011

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 26, 2011

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2012

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2014

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

December 19, 2011

Results QC Date

November 6, 2015

Last Update Submit

August 31, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

CeftazidimeMeropenemMetronidazoleAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAntiprotozoal AgentsAntiparasitic AgentscIAI, Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infection

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-To-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set (Primary Outcome for FDA).

    The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention is necessary. Indeterminate response are where study data were not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason, including patient lost to follow-up or assessment not undertaken such that a determination of clinical response could not be made, death where cIAI was clearly noncontributory or circumstances that precluded classification as a cure or failure. Results from two identical protocols D4280C00001 and D4280C00005 combined into a single database with agreement from FDA and EMA.

    TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug

  • Clinical Response at the TOC Visit in the Modified Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set (Co-primary Outcome for Rest of World [ROW]).

    The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. Indeterminate response are where study data were not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason, including patient lost to follow-up or assessment not undertaken such that a determination of clinical response could not be made, dDeath where cIAI was clearly noncontributory or circumstances that precluded classification as a cure or failure.

    TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug

  • Clinical Response at the TOC Visit in the Clinically Evaulable (CE) Analysis Set (Co-primary Outcome for Rest of World [ROW]).

    The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary.

    TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Clinical Cure at TOC in the Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set

    TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug

  • Clinical Cure at TOC in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set

    TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug

  • Clinical Response by Visit in the Primary Population: Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT)

    EOT: within 24 hours after last dose of study drug. TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug. LFU: 42 to 49 days after start of study drug

  • Per-patient Microbiological Response in the Microbiologically Modified Intent- To-Treat Analysis Set

    EOT: within 24 hours after last dose of study drug. TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug. LFU 42 to 49 days after start of study drug

  • Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set.

    TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug.

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole

EXPERIMENTAL

IV treatment

Drug: CAZ-AVIDrug: Metronidazole

Meropenem

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

IV treatment

Drug: Meropenem

Interventions

Ceftazidime 2000 mg and 500 mg of avibactam

CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole

500 mg of Metronidazole

CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole

1 gram of Meropenem

Meropenem

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • to 90 years of age inclusive
  • Female patient is authorized to participate if at least one of the following criteria are met:
  • Surgical sterilization
  • Age ≥50 years and postmenopausal as defined by amenorrhea for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments
  • Age \<50 years and postmenopausal as defined by documented LH and FSH levels in the postmenopausal range PLUS amenorrhea for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments
  • Patient has a negative serum pregnancy test (serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin \[ß-hCG\]) within 1 day prior to study entry, and agrees to use highly effective contraception methods during treatment and for at least 7 days after last dose of IV study therapy
  • Intraoperative/postoperative enrollment with confirmation (presence of pus within the abdominal cavity) of an intra-abdominal infection associated with peritonitis
  • Confirmation of infection by surgical intervention within 24 hours of entry: evidence of systemic inflammatory response; physical findings consistent with intra-abdominal infection; supportive radiologic imaging findings of intra-abdominal infections

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient is diagnosed with traumatic bowel perforation undergoing surgery within 12 hours; perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers undergoing surgery within 24 hours. Other intra-abdominal processes in which primary etiology is not likely to be infectious
  • Patient has abdominal wall abscess or bowel obstruction without perforation or ischemic bowel without perforation
  • Patient has suspected intra-abdominal infections due to fungus, parasites, virus or tuberculosis
  • Patient is considered unlikely to survive the 6 to 8 week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness, including septic shock that is associated with a high risk of mortality

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (56)

Research Site

Chula Vista, California, United States

Location

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Location

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Location

Research Site

Somers Point, New Jersey, United States

Location

Research Site

Córdoba, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Rosario, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Rousse, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Varna, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Zagreb, Croatia

Location

Research Site

Děčín, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Hradec Králové, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Jihlava, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Olomouc, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Prague, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Teplice, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Budapest, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Székesfehérvár, Hungary

Location

Research Site

Bangalore, India

Location

Research Site

Pune, India

Location

Research Site

Trivandrum, India

Location

Research Site

Vadodara, India

Location

Research Site

Hadera, Israel

Location

Research Site

Haifa, Israel

Location

Research Site

Riga, Latvia

Location

Research Site

Alor Star, Malaysia

Location

Research Site

Durango, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico

Location

Research Site

's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Enschede, Netherlands

Location

Research Site

Arequipa, Peru

Location

Research Site

Cercardo de Lima, Peru

Location

Research Site

Lima, Peru

Location

Research Site

Trujillo, Peru

Location

Research Site

Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Location

Research Site

Iași, Romania

Location

Research Site

Kemerovo, Russia

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saratov, Russia

Location

Research Site

Vsevolozhsk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Pretoria, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Alcorcón, Spain

Location

Research Site

Elche, Spain

Location

Research Site

Sabadell(Barcelona), Spain

Location

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taichung, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Tainan, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Bangkok, Thailand

Location

Research Site

Khon Kaen, Thailand

Location

Research Site

Phisanulok, Thailand

Location

Research Site

Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kyiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Mazuski JE, Gasink LB, Armstrong J, Broadhurst H, Stone GG, Rank D, Llorens L, Newell P, Pachl J. Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 1;62(11):1380-1389. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw133. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

    PMID: 26962078BACKGROUND
  • Torres A, Wible M, Tawadrous M, Irani P, Stone GG, Quintana A, Debabov D, Burroughs M, Bradford PA, Kollef M. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Nov 6;78(11):2672-2682. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad280.

  • Cheng K, Newell P, Chow JW, Broadhurst H, Wilson D, Yates K, Wardman A. Safety Profile of Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Pooled Data from the Adult Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trial Programme. Drug Saf. 2020 Aug;43(8):751-766. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00934-3.

  • Kongnakorn T, Eckmann C, Bassetti M, Tichy E, Di Virgilio R, Baillon-Plot N, Charbonneau C. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) as empirical treatment comparing to ceftolozane/tazobactam and to meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Dec 21;8:204. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0652-x. eCollection 2019.

  • Li J, Lovern M, Green ML, Chiu J, Zhou D, Comisar C, Xiong Y, Hing J, MacPherson M, Wright JG, Riccobene T, Carrothers TJ, Das S. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Across Adult Indications and Patient Subgroups. Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Mar;12(2):151-163. doi: 10.1111/cts.12585. Epub 2018 Sep 28.

  • Nichols WW, Stone GG, Newell P, Broadhurst H, Wardman A, MacPherson M, Yates K, Riccobene T, Critchley IA, Das S. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Oct 24;62(11):e02590-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02590-17. Print 2018 Nov.

  • Stone GG, Newell P, Gasink LB, Broadhurst H, Wardman A, Yates K, Chen Z, Song J, Chow JW. Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pooled data from the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Sep 1;73(9):2519-2523. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky204.

  • Stone GG, Newell P, Bradford PA. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Isolates from Patients in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial for Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jun 26;62(7):e02584-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02584-17. Print 2018 Jul.

  • Mendes RE, Castanheira M, Woosley LN, Stone GG, Bradford PA, Flamm RK. Molecular beta-Lactamase Characterization of Aerobic Gram-Negative Pathogens Recovered from Patients Enrolled in the Ceftazidime-Avibactam Phase 3 Trials for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, with Efficacies Analyzed against Susceptible and Resistant Subsets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 May 24;61(6):e02447-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02447-16. Print 2017 Jun.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

MetronidazoleMeropenem

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

NitroimidazolesNitro CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsThienamycinsCarbapenemsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring

Limitations and Caveats

This summary describes data collected from two identical CSPs (D4280C00001 and D4280C00005). With agreement from the EMA and the FDA the data have been combined into a single study database.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Paul Newell, Medical Science Director
Organization
AstraZeneca

Study Officials

  • Paul Newell, MBBS, MRCP

    AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2011

First Posted

December 26, 2011

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2014

Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Results First Posted

March 1, 2016

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations