Compare Ceftazidime-Avibactam + Metronidazole Versus Meropenem for Hospitalized Adults With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
A Phase III, Randomized, Multicenter, Double Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Determine the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Ceftazidime Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections In Hospitalized Adults
2 other identifiers
interventional
493
20 countries
56
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftazidime Avibactam plus Metronidazole compared to Meropenem for treating hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2012
56 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 1, 2016
CompletedSeptember 6, 2017
August 1, 2017
2.1 years
December 19, 2011
November 6, 2015
August 31, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Clinical Response at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-To-Treat (mMITT) Analysis Set (Primary Outcome for FDA).
The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention is necessary. Indeterminate response are where study data were not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason, including patient lost to follow-up or assessment not undertaken such that a determination of clinical response could not be made, death where cIAI was clearly noncontributory or circumstances that precluded classification as a cure or failure. Results from two identical protocols D4280C00001 and D4280C00005 combined into a single database with agreement from FDA and EMA.
TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug
Clinical Response at the TOC Visit in the Modified Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set (Co-primary Outcome for Rest of World [ROW]).
The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary. Indeterminate response are where study data were not available for evaluation of efficacy for any reason, including patient lost to follow-up or assessment not undertaken such that a determination of clinical response could not be made, dDeath where cIAI was clearly noncontributory or circumstances that precluded classification as a cure or failure.
TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug
Clinical Response at the TOC Visit in the Clinically Evaulable (CE) Analysis Set (Co-primary Outcome for Rest of World [ROW]).
The number of patients meeting the cure criteria: complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection such that no further antibacterial therapy, drainage, or surgical intervention was necessary.
TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Clinical Cure at TOC in the Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set
TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug
Clinical Cure at TOC in the Extended Microbiologically Evaluable Analysis Set
TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug
Clinical Response by Visit in the Primary Population: Microbiologically Modified Intent-to-Treat (mMITT)
EOT: within 24 hours after last dose of study drug. TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug. LFU: 42 to 49 days after start of study drug
Per-patient Microbiological Response in the Microbiologically Modified Intent- To-Treat Analysis Set
EOT: within 24 hours after last dose of study drug. TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug. LFU 42 to 49 days after start of study drug
Per-pathogen Microbiological Response at TOC in the Microbiologically Modified Intent-To-Treat Analysis Set.
TOC: 28 to 35 days after start of study drug.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CAZ-AVI + Metronidazole
EXPERIMENTALIV treatment
Meropenem
ACTIVE COMPARATORIV treatment
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 90 years of age inclusive
- Female patient is authorized to participate if at least one of the following criteria are met:
- Surgical sterilization
- Age ≥50 years and postmenopausal as defined by amenorrhea for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments
- Age \<50 years and postmenopausal as defined by documented LH and FSH levels in the postmenopausal range PLUS amenorrhea for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatments
- Patient has a negative serum pregnancy test (serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin \[ß-hCG\]) within 1 day prior to study entry, and agrees to use highly effective contraception methods during treatment and for at least 7 days after last dose of IV study therapy
- Intraoperative/postoperative enrollment with confirmation (presence of pus within the abdominal cavity) of an intra-abdominal infection associated with peritonitis
- Confirmation of infection by surgical intervention within 24 hours of entry: evidence of systemic inflammatory response; physical findings consistent with intra-abdominal infection; supportive radiologic imaging findings of intra-abdominal infections
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is diagnosed with traumatic bowel perforation undergoing surgery within 12 hours; perforation of gastroduodenal ulcers undergoing surgery within 24 hours. Other intra-abdominal processes in which primary etiology is not likely to be infectious
- Patient has abdominal wall abscess or bowel obstruction without perforation or ischemic bowel without perforation
- Patient has suspected intra-abdominal infections due to fungus, parasites, virus or tuberculosis
- Patient is considered unlikely to survive the 6 to 8 week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness, including septic shock that is associated with a high risk of mortality
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Pfizerlead
- Forest Laboratoriescollaborator
Study Sites (56)
Research Site
Chula Vista, California, United States
Research Site
San Diego, California, United States
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Research Site
Somers Point, New Jersey, United States
Research Site
Córdoba, Argentina
Research Site
Rosario, Argentina
Research Site
Rousse, Bulgaria
Research Site
Varna, Bulgaria
Research Site
Zagreb, Croatia
Research Site
Děčín, Czechia
Research Site
Hradec Králové, Czechia
Research Site
Jihlava, Czechia
Research Site
Olomouc, Czechia
Research Site
Prague, Czechia
Research Site
Teplice, Czechia
Research Site
Budapest, Hungary
Research Site
Székesfehérvár, Hungary
Research Site
Bangalore, India
Research Site
Pune, India
Research Site
Trivandrum, India
Research Site
Vadodara, India
Research Site
Hadera, Israel
Research Site
Haifa, Israel
Research Site
Riga, Latvia
Research Site
Alor Star, Malaysia
Research Site
Durango, Mexico
Research Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Research Site
Mexico City, Mexico
Research Site
's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
Research Site
Enschede, Netherlands
Research Site
Arequipa, Peru
Research Site
Cercardo de Lima, Peru
Research Site
Lima, Peru
Research Site
Trujillo, Peru
Research Site
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Research Site
Iași, Romania
Research Site
Kemerovo, Russia
Research Site
Moscow, Russia
Research Site
Saratov, Russia
Research Site
Vsevolozhsk, Russia
Research Site
Pretoria, South Africa
Research Site
Alcorcón, Spain
Research Site
Elche, Spain
Research Site
Sabadell(Barcelona), Spain
Research Site
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Research Site
Taichung, Taiwan
Research Site
Tainan, Taiwan
Research Site
Taipei, Taiwan
Research Site
Bangkok, Thailand
Research Site
Khon Kaen, Thailand
Research Site
Phisanulok, Thailand
Research Site
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
Research Site
Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
Research Site
Kharkiv, Ukraine
Research Site
Kyiv, Ukraine
Research Site
Zaporizhzhya, Ukraine
Related Publications (9)
Mazuski JE, Gasink LB, Armstrong J, Broadhurst H, Stone GG, Rank D, Llorens L, Newell P, Pachl J. Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: Results From a Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Program. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 1;62(11):1380-1389. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw133. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
PMID: 26962078BACKGROUNDTorres A, Wible M, Tawadrous M, Irani P, Stone GG, Quintana A, Debabov D, Burroughs M, Bradford PA, Kollef M. Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime/avibactam in patients with infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative pathogens: a pooled analysis from the Phase 3 clinical trial programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023 Nov 6;78(11):2672-2682. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad280.
PMID: 37700689DERIVEDCheng K, Newell P, Chow JW, Broadhurst H, Wilson D, Yates K, Wardman A. Safety Profile of Ceftazidime-Avibactam: Pooled Data from the Adult Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trial Programme. Drug Saf. 2020 Aug;43(8):751-766. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00934-3.
PMID: 32602065DERIVEDKongnakorn T, Eckmann C, Bassetti M, Tichy E, Di Virgilio R, Baillon-Plot N, Charbonneau C. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) as empirical treatment comparing to ceftolozane/tazobactam and to meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Dec 21;8:204. doi: 10.1186/s13756-019-0652-x. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31890160DERIVEDLi J, Lovern M, Green ML, Chiu J, Zhou D, Comisar C, Xiong Y, Hing J, MacPherson M, Wright JG, Riccobene T, Carrothers TJ, Das S. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment Across Adult Indications and Patient Subgroups. Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Mar;12(2):151-163. doi: 10.1111/cts.12585. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
PMID: 30221827DERIVEDNichols WW, Stone GG, Newell P, Broadhurst H, Wardman A, MacPherson M, Yates K, Riccobene T, Critchley IA, Das S. Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Oct 24;62(11):e02590-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02590-17. Print 2018 Nov.
PMID: 30061279DERIVEDStone GG, Newell P, Gasink LB, Broadhurst H, Wardman A, Yates K, Chen Z, Song J, Chow JW. Clinical activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pooled data from the ceftazidime/avibactam Phase III clinical trial programme. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Sep 1;73(9):2519-2523. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky204.
PMID: 29912399DERIVEDStone GG, Newell P, Bradford PA. In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Isolates from Patients in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial for Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jun 26;62(7):e02584-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02584-17. Print 2018 Jul.
PMID: 29686147DERIVEDMendes RE, Castanheira M, Woosley LN, Stone GG, Bradford PA, Flamm RK. Molecular beta-Lactamase Characterization of Aerobic Gram-Negative Pathogens Recovered from Patients Enrolled in the Ceftazidime-Avibactam Phase 3 Trials for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections, with Efficacies Analyzed against Susceptible and Resistant Subsets. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 May 24;61(6):e02447-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02447-16. Print 2017 Jun.
PMID: 28348155DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This summary describes data collected from two identical CSPs (D4280C00001 and D4280C00005). With agreement from the EMA and the FDA the data have been combined into a single study database.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Paul Newell, Medical Science Director
- Organization
- AstraZeneca
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Paul Newell, MBBS, MRCP
AstraZeneca
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 19, 2011
First Posted
December 26, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2012
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
September 6, 2017
Results First Posted
March 1, 2016
Record last verified: 2017-08