Study to Compare TP-434 and Ertapenem in Community-acquired Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Multicenter, Prospective Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety, and PK of 2 Dose Regimens of TP-434 Compared With Ertapenem in Adult Community-Acquired Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections
1 other identifier
interventional
143
6 countries
38
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, prospective study to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of two dose regimens of TP-434 compared with ertapenem in the treatment of adult community-acquired complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jan 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
38 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 21, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 23, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 4, 2015
CompletedJanuary 6, 2022
December 1, 2021
1.3 years
December 21, 2010
August 4, 2015
December 16, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population at the Test-of-Cure Visit
Clinical response was classified as cure (complete resolution or significant improvement of signs and symptoms of the index infection), failure (death related to complicated intra-abdominal infection \[cIAI\], persisting or recurrent infection within the abdomen, postsurgical wound infection, or administration of effective concomitant antibacterial therapy), or indeterminate (Test-of-Cure \[TOC\] assessment was not available, death unrelated to cIAI, or some other reason).
TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit
EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at TOC Visit
TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Population at the Follow-up Visit
Follow-up Visit (28-42 days after last dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the EOT Visit
EOT Visit (4-14 days after first dose of study drug)
Clinical Response to TP-434 and Ertapenem in the Clinically Modified Intent-to-treat (c-MITT) Population at the TOC Visit
TOC Visit (10-14 days after last dose of study drug)
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
TP-434, 1.5 mg/kg q24h
EXPERIMENTALTP-434 was administered intravenously (IV) at a dose of 1.5 milligrams per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg) every 24 hours (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days (7 days for participants in India). TP-434 treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI) resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached.
TP-434, 1.0 mg/kg q12h
EXPERIMENTALTP-434 was administered IV at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg every 12 hours (q12h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days (7 days for participants in India). TP-434 treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of cIAI resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached.
Ertapenem, 1 g q24h
ACTIVE COMPARATORErtapenem was administered IV at a dose of 1 gram (g) q24h for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days (7 days for participants in India). Ertapenem treatment was to be stopped when symptoms of cIAI resolved, there was treatment failure, or the maximum allowed number of infusion days was reached.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Abdominal pain/discomfort with onset prior to hospitalization
- Evidence of a systemic inflammatory response
- Physical findings consistent with intra-abdominal infection (IAI)
- Clinical diagnosis of community-acquired IAI requiring urgent surgical or percutaneous intervention and not expected to require antibacterial therapy for longer than 14 days
- Body mass index (BMI) of ≤ 30 kilograms per square meter (kg/m\^2)
- Able to provide informed consent. If the participant is unable to provide informed consent, the participant's legally acceptable representative may provide written consent in accordance with institutional guidelines
- If female, not pregnant or nursing or, if of child-bearing potential either: will commit to use at least two medically accepted, effective methods of birth control (for example, condom, oral contraceptive, indwelling intrauterine device, hormonal implant/patch, injections, approved cervical ring) during study drug dosing and for 90 days following last study drug dose or practicing sexual abstinence
You may not qualify if:
- Symptoms related to diagnosis of complicated appendicitis (if current diagnosis) for \< 24 hours prior to current hospitalization
- Previously hospitalized or admitted to a healthcare facility within the last 6 months
- Managed by Staged Abdominal Repair or other open abdomen technique
- Known at study entry to have an IAI caused by a pathogen(s) resistant to both study drug antibiotics
- Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score \> 25
- Unlikely to survive the 6-8 week study period
- Any rapidly-progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness, including acute hepatic failure, respiratory failure and septic shock
- Requirement for vasopressors at therapeutic dosages
- Renal failure
- Presence or possible signs of hepatic disease
- Hematocrit \< 25% or hemoglobin \< 8 grams per deciliter (g/dL)
- Neutropenia with absolute neutrophil count \< 1000 cells per cubic millimeter (mm\^3)
- Platelet count \< 50,000/mm3
- Abnormal coagulation tests or participant on anticoagulants
- Immunocompromised condition, including known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity or acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), organ (bone marrow) transplant recipients, and hematological malignancy. Immunosuppressive therapy, including use of high-dose corticosteroids (for example, \> 40 milligrams \[mg\] prednisone or equivalent per day for greater than 2 weeks)
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (38)
Long Beach VA Medical Center
Long Beach, California, 90822, United States
Denver Health Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Mercury Street Medical Group
Butte, Montana, 59701, United States
MHAT "Yulia Vrevska - Byala" EOOD, Byala
Byala, 7100, Bulgaria
UMHAT "Dr. Georgi Stranski" EAD, Pleven
Pleven, 5800, Bulgaria
UMHAT "Sveti Georgi" EAD, Plovdiv
Plovdiv, 4000, Bulgaria
MHAT "Russe" AD, Russe
Rousse, 7002, Bulgaria
MHAT "Tokuda Hospital Sofia" AD, Sofia
Sofia, 1407, Bulgaria
UMHAT "Tzaritza Yoanna" EAD, Sofia
Sofia, 1527, Bulgaria
UMHATEM "N.I. Pirogov" EAD, Sofia
Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
UMHATEM "N.I.Pirogov" EAD, Sofia
Sofia, 1606, Bulgaria
Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Victoria Hospital
Fort Mumbai, Bangalore, 560002, India
Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre
Kochi, Kerala, 682041, India
Sahyadri Munot Hospital
Pune, Maharashtra, 411042, India
S.R. Kalla Memorial Gastro & General Hospital
Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
HCG-Medisurge Hospitals Pvt. Ltd.
Ahmedabad, 380006, India
Santosh Hospital
Bangalore, 560005, India
K.R. Hospital
Bangalore, 560050, India
M.S. Ramalah Medical College and Hospitals
Bangalore, 560054, India
Sai Vani Hospitals, Ltd.
Hyderabad, 500029, India
Daugavpils Regional Hospital
Daugavpils, LV-5417, Latvia
Jekabpils Regional Hospital
Jēkabpils, LV 5201, Latvia
Rezeknes Hospital
Rēzekne, LV-4601, Latvia
Vidzeme Hospital
Valmiera, LV-4201, Latvia
Kaunas Hospital
Kaunas, LT-45130, Lithuania
Kaunas Clinical Hospital
Kaunas, LT-47144, Lithuania
Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics
Kaunas, LT-50009, Lithuania
Klaipeda University Hospital
Klaipėda, LT-92288, Lithuania
Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinics
Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
Vilnius City Clinical Hospital
Vilnius, LT-10207, Lithuania
Emergency Clinical City Hospital
Timișoara, Timiș County, 300079, Romania
"Dr. Carol Davila" Clinical Nephrology Hospital General Surgery Clinic
Bucharest, 010701, Romania
Emergency Clinical Hospital Bucharest
Bucharest, 014461, Romania
Coltea Clinical Hospital
Bucharest, 030171, Romania
:Sfantul loan" Clinical Emergency Hospital
Bucharest, 042122, Romania
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest
Bucharest, 050098, Romania
Related Publications (1)
Solomkin JS, Ramesh MK, Cesnauskas G, Novikovs N, Stefanova P, Sutcliffe JA, Walpole SM, Horn PT. Phase 2, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of eravacycline versus ertapenem for adult community-acquired complicated intra-abdominal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):1847-54. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01614-13. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
PMID: 24342651DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chief Development Officer
- Organization
- La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Patrick T Horn, MD, PhD
Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2010
First Posted
December 23, 2010
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2012
Study Completion
May 1, 2012
Last Updated
January 6, 2022
Results First Posted
September 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2021-12