NCT01499277

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Ceftaroline Fosamil versus Vancomycin plus Aztreonam in treatment of patients with complicated bacterial skin and soft tissue infections.

Trial Health

98
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
802

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2012

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
28 countries

91 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 16, 2011

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 26, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2012

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2014

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2015

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 9, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Status Verified

September 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

December 16, 2011

Results QC Date

June 23, 2015

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTI)skin infectionceftarolinewound infectioncellulitisburn infectionbacterial infectionvancomycin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical Response at Test of Cure (TOC) in Modified Intent-to-treat (MITT) Analysis Set

    The observed difference in the clinical cure rates at TOC (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in MITT. Clinical cure rate is measured by comparing the participant's signs and symptoms at TOC visit to those recorded at study baseline.

    7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug

  • Clinical Response at TOC in Clinically Evaluable (CE) Analysis Set

    The observed difference in the clinical cure rates at TOC (ceftaroline group minus vancomycin plus aztreonam group) in CE. Clinical cure rate is measured by comparing the participant's signs and symptoms at TOC visit to those recorded at study baseline.

    7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Per Patient Microbiological Response at TOC in Microbiologically Modified-intent-to-treat (mMITT) Analysis Set

    7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug

  • Per-patient Micro Response at TOC in Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Analysis Set

    7 to 20 days after the last dose of study drug

  • Clinical Response at End of Treatment (EOT) in MITT Analysis Set

    On day of last dose of study drug (or + 1 day)

  • Clinical Response at EOT in CE Analysis Set

    On day of last dose of study drug (or +1 day)

  • Clinical Relapse at Late Follow-up (LFU) in CE Patients Who Were Cured at TOC

    21 to 42 days after the last dose of study drug

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Ceftaroline fosamil

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will receive 600 mg of ceftaroline fosamil administered as a 120-minute intravenous infusion very 8 hours. Each dose will be infused in a volume of 250 mL over 120-minutes followed by aztreonam placebo in a volume of 100 mL infused over 30 minutes every 8 hours. In addition vancomycin placebo will be given in a volume of 250 mL infused over 120 minutes every 12 hours. Doses will be adjusted according to the patient's renal function.

Drug: Ceftaroline fosamil

Vancomycin plus aztreonam

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will receive combination of vancomycin plus aztreonam. Dose of vancomycin will be based on the patient's actual weight and will receive intravenous vancomycin every 12 hours with each dose infused over 120-minutes. Aztreonam dose will be 1 gram intravenously in a volume of 100 mL infused over 30 minutes every 8 hours. In addition, ceftaroline fosamil placebo will be given in a volume of 250 mL infused over 120 minutes every 8 hours. Doses adjusted according to patients renal function

Drug: VancomycinDrug: Aztreonam

Interventions

IV ceftaroline 600mg every 8 hours

Ceftaroline fosamil

IV vancomycin 15mg/kg every 12 hours

Vancomycin plus aztreonam

IV aztreonam 1 g every 8 hours

Vancomycin plus aztreonam

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female, aged 18 years or older
  • Complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSTI)
  • Infection of sufficient severity to warrant hospitalization
  • Infection of sufficient severity such that it is expected to require at least 5 days of intravenous antibiotic therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Received systemic antibacterial drugs for greater than 24 hours within 96 hours prior to first dose of study drug
  • Uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections, skin infections suspected to be caused by viral or fungal pathogens
  • Diabetic foot infections, decubitus ulcers, ulcers due to peripheral vascular disease
  • Infection caused by human or animal bites, sternal wound infections, bone infection or arthritis due to an infection, critical limb ischemia of the affected limb
  • Chronic liver disease or severe impaired renal function, severe low white blood cell count, burns on greater than 15% of total body surface area, necrotizing skin infection, amputation required of primary site of infection, sustained shock

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (91)

Research Site

Chula Vista, California, United States

Location

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Research Site

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Location

Research Site

Hazard, Kentucky, United States

Location

Research Site

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Location

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Location

Research Site

Garden City, New York, United States

Location

Research Site

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Location

Research Site

Córdoba, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Santa Fe, Argentina

Location

Research Site

Parkville, Australia

Location

Research Site

Brussels, Belgium

Location

Research Site

Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Passo Fundo, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Salvador, Brazil

Location

Research Site

São José do Rio Preto, Brazil

Location

Research Site

Pleven, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Rousse, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Sofia, Bulgaria

Location

Research Site

Temuco, Chile

Location

Research Site

Viña del Mar, Chile

Location

Research Site

Beijing, China

Location

Research Site

Changchun, China

Location

Research Site

Changsha, China

Location

Research Site

Chengdu, China

Location

Research Site

Chongqing, China

Location

Research Site

Fuzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Guangzhou, China

Location

Research Site

Haikou, China

Location

Research Site

Nanning, China

Location

Research Site

Qingdao, China

Location

Research Site

Shanghai, China

Location

Research Site

Shenyang, China

Location

Research Site

Shijiazhuang, China

Location

Research Site

Wuhan, China

Location

Research Site

Xi'an, China

Location

Research Site

Slavonski Brod, Croatia

Location

Research Site

Zagreb, Croatia

Location

Research Site

Jihlava, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Pardubice, Czechia

Location

Research Site

Orléans, France

Location

Research Site

Dessau, Germany

Location

Research Site

Hanau, Germany

Location

Research Site

Heilbronn, Germany

Location

Research Site

Athens, Greece

Location

Research Site

Kowloon, Hong Kong

Location

Research Site

Pokfulam, Hong Kong

Location

Research Site

Haifa, Israel

Location

Research Site

Ramat Gan, Israel

Location

Research Site

Safed, Israel

Location

Research Site

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

Research Site

Milan, Italy

Location

Research Site

Guadalajara, Mexico

Location

Research Site

Cusco, Peru

Location

Research Site

Lima, Peru

Location

Research Site

Manila, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Quezon City, Philippines

Location

Research Site

Lodz, Poland

Location

Research Site

Lublin, Poland

Location

Research Site

Bucharest, Romania

Location

Research Site

Moscow, Russia

Location

Research Site

Perm, Russia

Location

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, Russia

Location

Research Site

Smolensk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Vsevolozhsk, Russia

Location

Research Site

Yaroslavl, Russia

Location

Research Site

Benoni, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Cape Town, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Johannesburg, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Worcester, South Africa

Location

Research Site

Ansan, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Deagu, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Incheon, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Seoul, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Wŏnju, South Korea

Location

Research Site

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Research Site

Granada, Spain

Location

Research Site

Madrid, Spain

Location

Research Site

Terrassa, Spain

Location

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Taipei, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Yung Kang City, Taiwan

Location

Research Site

Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Research Site

Cherkasy, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Kharkiv, Ukraine

Location

Research Site

Odesa, Ukraine

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Dryden M, Kantecki M, Yan JL, Stone GG, Leister-Tebbe H, Wilcox M. Treatment outcomes of secondary bacteraemia in patients treated with ceftaroline fosamil: pooled results from six phase III clinical trials. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Mar;28:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.027. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

  • Wilcox M, Yan JL, Gonzalez PL, Dryden M, Stone GG, Kantecki M. Impact of Underlying Comorbidities on Outcomes of Patients Treated with Ceftaroline Fosamil for Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: Pooled Results from Three Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials. Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Feb;11(1):217-230. doi: 10.1007/s40121-021-00557-w. Epub 2021 Nov 6.

  • Sanchez-Garcia M, Hammond J, Yan JL, Kantecki M, Ansari W, Dryden M. Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes Among Patients with Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Analysis of the Phase 3 COVERS Randomized Trial of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam. Infect Dis Ther. 2020 Sep;9(3):609-623. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00297-3. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

  • Corey GR, Wilcox MH, Gonzalez J, Jandourek A, Wilson DJ, Friedland HD, Das S, Iaconis J, Dryden M. Ceftaroline fosamil therapy in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections with systemic inflammatory signs: A retrospective dose comparison across three pivotal trials. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Jun;53(6):830-837. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

  • Cheng K, Pypstra R, Yan JL, Hammond J. Summary of the safety and tolerability of two treatment regimens of ceftaroline fosamil: 600 mg every 8 h versus 600 mg every 12 h. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Apr 1;74(4):1086-1091. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky519.

  • Das S, Li J, Iaconis J, Zhou D, Stone GG, Yan JL, Melnick D. Ceftaroline fosamil doses and breakpoints for Staphylococcus aureus in complicated skin and soft tissue infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Feb 1;74(2):425-431. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky439.

  • Dryden M, Zhang Y, Wilson D, Iaconis JP, Gonzalez J. A Phase III, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial of ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg every 8 h versus vancomycin plus aztreonam in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infection with systemic inflammatory response or underlying comorbidities. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Dec;71(12):3575-3584. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw333. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Soft Tissue InfectionsCellulitisWound InfectionBacterial Infections

Interventions

CeftarolineVancomycinAztreonam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSkin Diseases, InfectiousSuppurationConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBacterial Infections and Mycoses

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cephalosporinsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsThiazinesSulfur CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsGlycopeptidesGlycoconjugatesCarbohydratesPeptidesAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsMonobactamsHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Yunxia Lu
Organization
AstraZeneca-PPD

Study Officials

  • David Melnick, MSD

    AstraZeneca

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2011

First Posted

December 26, 2011

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion

June 1, 2014

Study Completion

January 1, 2015

Last Updated

September 6, 2017

Results First Posted

November 9, 2015

Record last verified: 2017-09

Locations