A Comparison Between Continuous and Intermittent Intraabdominal Analgesia Using Local Anaesthetics
PoPuLAR
Phase IV Study of Postoperative Pain Management
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesis is that patient controlled local anesthetics administered intraabdominally are more efficacious compared to continuous infusion in reducing postoperative pain and morphine consumption.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2008
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2011
CompletedSeptember 29, 2015
September 1, 2015
2.4 years
October 7, 2011
September 26, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Morphine consumption
Total morphine consumption 0 - 24 h postoperatively
0-24 h
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Postoperative pain
0 - 48 h postoperatively
PONV
0 - 48 h postoperatively
Home discharge
0-10 days
Study Arms (2)
Continuous infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORContinuous infusion of LA intraabdominally
PCRA (Intermittent injection)
EXPERIMENTALPatient controlled LA intraabdominally
Interventions
Intermittent injection of LA intraabdominally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- year old patients undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy.
- ASA I - II (Appendix 1).
- Have signed and dated Informed Consent.
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the trial.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients undergoing open abdominal hysterectomy due to suspected cancer.
- Patients with chronic pain who are taking analgesics regularly.
- Allergy to components in levobupivacaine (Chirocaine)/Saline (Sodium Chloride).
- Participation in other clinical trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Örebro, 701 85, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Perniola, MD
Örebro University, Sweden
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anil Gupta, PhD
Örebro University, Sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2011
First Posted
December 14, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
June 1, 2010
Study Completion
June 1, 2010
Last Updated
September 29, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09