NCT03443271

Brief Summary

Random allocation of patients in two groups; Tap block group (T group) and control group (C group). All patients will receive standard general anesthesia and postoperative pain management. The TAP group patient will receive ultrasound guided (US) TAP block with 20 cc of 0.25% of bupivacaine and control group will receive 20cc of normal saline. TAP block in both groups will be performed with US guidance and the study drug will be injected after complete visualization of the needle tip between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles. Venous blood samples (5 ml for each time) for metabolic and stress hormones, including, Serum cortisol and nor-epinephrine will be collected before anesthesia at the time of cannulation (T1),60 minutes after incision(T2), 6hrs (T3)and 12 h (T4) after the surgery. Postoperatively patient will be put on patient controlled intravenous infusion of nalbuphine

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 17, 2016

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 19, 2017

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 20, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 26, 2018

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 23, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

February 23, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

January 26, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

transversus abdominis plane blockabdominal hysterectomystress response

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Serum Cortisol

    Serum cortisol measured in µg/dL

    12 hours after surgery

  • Serum Norepinephrine

    Serum norepinephrine levels in pg/ml

    12 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain Score

    12 hours after surgery

  • Rescue analgesia

    12 hours after surgery

  • Total amount of opioid consumption

    12 hours after surgery

  • Side effects

    12 hours after surgery

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Patient satisfaction

    24 hours after surgery

Study Arms (2)

Group T (TAP Block with Bupivicaine)

EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed in this group. Bupivicaine 0.25 % 20 ml will be administered in the block on either side.

Procedure: TAP Block with Bupivicaine

Group C (TAP Block with Placebo drug)

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed in this group. 0.9 % Saline 20 ml will be administered in the block on either side.

Procedure: TAP Block with Placebo drug

Interventions

Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed and patient will be administered 20 ml of 0.25 % Bupivicaine on each side.

Group T (TAP Block with Bupivicaine)

Ultrasound guided TAP block will be performed and patient will be administered 20 ml of 0.9% Saline on each side.

Group C (TAP Block with Placebo drug)

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 60 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients scheduled for elective TAH via Pfannenstiel abdominal wall incision under general anaesthesia
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will be excluded if there is patient refusal to participate in the study, history of relevant drug allergy, or medical therapies considered to result in tolerance to opioids, hysterectomy performed for malignancy or inability to use patient control analgesia (PCA) devise

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (31)

  • Stanley G, Appadu B, Mead M, Rowbotham DJ. Dose requirements, efficacy and side effects of morphine and pethidine delivered by patient-controlled analgesia after gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Apr;76(4):484-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.4.484.

    PMID: 8652316BACKGROUND
  • Woodhouse A, Mather LE. The effect of duration of dose delivery with patient-controlled analgesia on the incidence of nausea and vomiting after hysterectomy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jan;45(1):57-62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00635.x.

    PMID: 9489595BACKGROUND
  • Ng A, Swami A, Smith G, Davidson AC, Emembolu J. The analgesic effects of intraperitoneal and incisional bupivacaine with epinephrine after total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jul;95(1):158-62, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200207000-00028.

    PMID: 12088961BACKGROUND
  • Nishiyama T, Yamashita K, Yokoyama T. Stress hormone changes in general anesthesia of long duration: isoflurane-nitrous oxide vs sevoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2005 Dec;17(8):586-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.03.009.

    PMID: 16427527BACKGROUND
  • Chae BK, Lee HW, Sun K, Choi YH, Kim HM. The effect of combined epidural and light general anesthesia on stress hormones in open heart surgery patients. Surg Today. 1998;28(7):727-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02484619.

    PMID: 9697266BACKGROUND
  • Li Y, Zhu S, Yan M. Combined general/epidural anesthesia (ropivacaine 0.375%) versus general anesthesia for upper abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008 May;106(5):1562-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1976.

    PMID: 18420877BACKGROUND
  • Yokoyama M, Itano Y, Katayama H, Morimatsu H, Takeda Y, Takahashi T, Nagano O, Morita K. The effects of continuous epidural anesthesia and analgesia on stress response and immune function in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy. Anesth Analg. 2005 Nov;101(5):1521-1527. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184287.15086.1E.

    PMID: 16244024BACKGROUND
  • Ozyuvaci E, Altan A, Karadeniz T, Topsakal M, Besisik A, Yucel M. General anesthesia versus epidural and general anesthesia in radical cystectomy. Urol Int. 2005;74(1):62-7. doi: 10.1159/000082712.

    PMID: 15711112BACKGROUND
  • Schricker T, Berroth A, Pfeiffer U, Schreiber M, Malik E, Schmidt M, Goertz A, Georgieff M. Influence of vaginal versus abdominal hysterectomy on perioperative glucose metabolism. Anesth Analg. 1996 Nov;83(5):991-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199611000-00016.

    PMID: 8895274BACKGROUND
  • Minhas MR, Kamal R, Afshan G, Raheel H. Knowledge, attitude and practice of parturients regarding Epidural Analgesia for labour in a university hospital in Karachi. J Pak Med Assoc. 2005 Feb;55(2):63-6.

    PMID: 15813631BACKGROUND
  • Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):408-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384. Epub 2009 Jan 26.

    PMID: 19174373BACKGROUND
  • Rafi AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia. 2001 Oct;56(10):1024-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.02279-40.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11576144BACKGROUND
  • McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f.

    PMID: 17179269BACKGROUND
  • Netter FH Back and Spinal Cord. In: Netter FH, ed. Atlas of Human Anatomy Summit. New Jersey, USA: The Ciba-Geigy Corporation, 1989:145-55.

    BACKGROUND
  • McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):186-91, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3.

    PMID: 18165577BACKGROUND
  • O'Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):91. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.10.006. No abstract available.

    PMID: 16418039BACKGROUND
  • Carney J, McDonnell JG, Ochana A, Bhinder R, Laffey JG. The transversus abdominis plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2056-60. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181871313.

    PMID: 19020158BACKGROUND
  • Brennan F, Carr DB, Cousins M. Pain management: a fundamental human right. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jul;105(1):205-21. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000268145.52345.55.

    PMID: 17578977BACKGROUND
  • Kehlet H, Holte K. Review of postoperative ileus. Am J Surg. 2001 Nov;182(5A Suppl):3S-10S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00781-4.

    PMID: 11755891BACKGROUND
  • Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Chronic pain as an outcome of surgery. A review of predictive factors. Anesthesiology. 2000 Oct;93(4):1123-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200010000-00038. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11020770BACKGROUND
  • Taylor R Jr, Pergolizzi JV, Raffa RB, Munzi E. Opioids: pharmacology, clinical uses and adverse effects. In: Tvildiani D, Gegechkori K, eds. Opioids: Pharmacology, Clinical Uses and Adverse Effects. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2012:75-94

    BACKGROUND
  • Hodges SC, Mijumbi C, Okello M, McCormick BA, Walker IA, Wilson IH. Anaesthesia services in developing countries: defining the problems. Anaesthesia. 2007 Jan;62(1):4-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04907.x.

    PMID: 17156220BACKGROUND
  • De Lima L, Sweeney C, Palmer JL, Bruera E. Potent analgesics are more expensive for patients in developing countries: a comparative study. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2004;18(1):59-70.

    PMID: 15148009BACKGROUND
  • Engquist A, Brandt MR, Fernandes A, Kehlet H. The blocking effect of epidural analgesia on the adrenocortical and hyperglycemic responses to surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1977;21(4):330-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1977.tb01227.x.

    PMID: 906788BACKGROUND
  • Hebbard P, Fujiwara Y, Shibata Y, Royse C. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):616-7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18020088BACKGROUND
  • Webster K. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block: Abdominal plane regional anaesthesia. Update Anaesth. 2008; 24:25-30

    BACKGROUND
  • Myles PS, Wengritzky R. Simplified postoperative nausea and vomiting impact scale for audit and post-discharge review. Br J Anaesth. 2012 Mar;108(3):423-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer505. Epub 2012 Jan 29.

    PMID: 22290456BACKGROUND
  • Jankovic Z, Ahmad N, Ravishankar N, Archer F. Transversus abdominis plane block: how safe is it? Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1758-9. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181853619. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18931248BACKGROUND
  • Rosario DJ, Jacob S, Luntley J, Skinner PP, Raftery AT. Mechanism of femoral nerve palsy complicating percutaneous ilioinguinal field block. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Mar;78(3):314-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.3.314.

    PMID: 9135313BACKGROUND
  • Walker G. Transversus abdominis plane block: a note of caution! Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):265. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep387. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20086069BACKGROUND
  • Ismail S, Ahmed A, Hoda MQ, Asghar S, Habib A, Aziz A. Mid-axillary transversus abdominis plane block and stress response after abdominal hysterectomy: A randomised controlled placebo trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Jul 1;38(7):768-776. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001413.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, PostoperativeFractures, Stress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsFractures, BoneWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Samina Ismail

    Aga Khan University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patients will be randomly allocated in equal groups of 25 each to undergo TAP block (T group) with 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine per side or TAP block with 20 ml of normal saline on both sides, which will be the control group (C group). The allocation sequence will be generated by a random number table, and group allocation will be concealed in sealed, opaque envelopes, which will not be opened until patient consent will be obtained. The process of randomization and blinding will be done by the clinical trial unit and according to the group allocation; pre-formed sterile syringes will be dispensed by the clinical trial unit to anesthesiologist performing the TAP block. The anesthesiologist performing the TAP block, patients and staff providing postoperative care will be blinded to group assignment.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Prospective double blind randomized control trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2018

First Posted

February 23, 2018

Study Start

June 17, 2016

Primary Completion

September 19, 2017

Study Completion

September 20, 2017

Last Updated

February 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-02