Aprepitant Versus Ondansetron in Preoperative Triple-therapy Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting
1 other identifier
interventional
122
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is being done to determine the efficacies of two preventative drug combinations for postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing neurosurgery. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of using aprepitant instead of ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone and promethazine for post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. By completing this comparison study investigators will determine the most efficacious drug combination which will allow us to enhance the overall comfort and satisfaction of neurosurgical patients in the immediate postoperative period.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2007
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 8, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 3, 2013
CompletedDecember 3, 2013
November 1, 2013
5.5 years
November 8, 2011
April 30, 2013
November 8, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Patients With a Complete Response/Complete Control During the First 24 Hours After Neurological Surgery Under General Anesthesia
To assess the efficacy of triple therapy with Scopolamine, Ondansetron and Dexamethasone for prevention of post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in high risk patients during the first 24 hours after neurological surgery under general anesthesia. \- Proportion of patients with a complete response/complete control during the first 24 hours after neurological surgery under general anesthesia. Complete Control is defined as no emetic episode, no need for rescue medication and no more than mild nausea overall after neurological surgery and general anesthesia. Complete Response is defined as no vomiting and no rescue therapy after neurological surgery and general anesthesia.
24 hours post operatively
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) Scores on a Verbal Response Scale
24 hours post-operatively
Study Arms (2)
Aprepitant
ACTIVE COMPARATORAprepitant is given orally, along with an oral or PO placebo depending on their group assignment for uniformity. Each patient will receive three drugs in their respective triple prophylactic medication plus an IV or oral placebo prior to induction of anesthesia. Triple therapy 40mg Aprepitant PO + IV placebo, 25mg Promethazine IV and 10mg dexamethasone IV
Ondansetron
ACTIVE COMPARATOROndansetron is given via IV, along with an oral or IV placebo depending on their group assignment for uniformity. Each patient will receive three drugs in their respective triple prophylactic medication (25mg promethazine, 10mg dexamethasone, and either 4mg ondansetron or 40mg aprepitant) plus an IV or oral placebo prior to induction of anesthesia. Triple therapy 4mg Ondansetron IV + PO placebo, 25mg Promethazine IV and 10mg dexamethasone IV
Interventions
Subject will receive 40 mg of Aprepitant versus placebo PO before anesthesia induction
Subject will receive 4 mg of Ondansetron IV versus placebo around anesthesia induction
Subject will receive 25 mg of Promethazine IV around anesthesia induction
Subject will receive 10 mg of Dexamethasone IV around anesthesia induction
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients
- to 85 years of age
- Scheduled for neurosurgery requiring opening of the cranium and dura at Ohio State University Medical Center and who consent in writing to participate in this study are eligible.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients will be excluded from this study if they are
- prisoners
- pregnant women
- mentally ill
- under the age of 18 or over the age of 85
- American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) classification V
- alcohol or drug abusers
- have a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) greater than 150 mmHg or less than 50 mmHg.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sergio Bergeselead
Study Sites (1)
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrew Otey
- Organization
- The Ohio State University Department of Anesthesiology
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sergio D Bergese, M.D.
Ohio State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 8, 2011
First Posted
November 18, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2007
Primary Completion
December 1, 2012
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
December 3, 2013
Results First Posted
December 3, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-11