Electromagnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Urge Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder
ELEC STIM
Electrical Field Stimulation for the Treatment of Urge Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder - Version: 3.0 Dated 16 APR 2012.
1 other identifier
interventional
130
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to collect data on the safety and efficacy of using an electrical field stimulation device, compared to a sham (placebo) device, to treat urinary urgency, urinary frequency and urge incontinence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 31, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 3, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedJanuary 31, 2013
January 1, 2013
1 year
October 31, 2011
January 30, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Reduction of incontinence episodes from baseline to follow-up greater for device arm than sham arm
Significant increase in the percentage of patients reporting a reduction in number of incontinence episodes per day for the investigational device vs. sham
One week after final treatment visit
No Serious Adverse Events or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects
Freedom from Serious Adverse Events or Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects related to procedure and/or investigational device through follow-up
First treatment through follow-up (one week after last treatment)
Study Arms (2)
Investigational Device
EXPERIMENTALTreatment using electrical field stimulation of peripheral nerves
Sham Device
SHAM COMPARATORControl group using sham device to mimic sound and sensation of investigational device
Interventions
Treatment with Electrical Field Stimulation Device
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Urinary Urge Incontinence
- Urinary Frequency
You may not qualify if:
- Primary complaint of Stress Incontinence
- Neurogenic bladder
- Overflow Incontinence
- Functional Incontinence
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- EMKinetics, Inclead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth Peters, MD
Birmingham Urologic Associates
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Scott MacDiarmid, MD
Alliance Urology Specialists
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 31, 2011
First Posted
November 3, 2011
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 31, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-01