Treatment of Sickle Cell Patients Hospitalized in Pain Crisis With Prophylactic Dose Low-molecular-weight Heparin (LMWH) Versus Placebo
Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Treatment of Sickle Cell Patients Hospitalized in Pain Crisis With Prophylactic Dose LMWH Versus Placebo
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is one of the most common inherited diseases worldwide and exhibits highest frequency in people of African descent. Patients with SCD currently have few treatment options, with hydroxyurea being the only medication approved to reduce the frequency of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and prevent other SCD complications such as acute chest syndrome. Once patients develop VOC, hospitalizations aim to alleviate pain; no specific therapy is currently available to otherwise affect the course of the VOC. However, there has been increasing interest in the role of coagulation in the pathogenesis of SCD. The investigators hypothesize that low dose anticoagulant therapy, such as prophylactic dose low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), could be a novel way to ameliorate the vaso-occlusive process and thereby hasten the resolution of pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started May 2011
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 16, 2015
CompletedFebruary 16, 2015
January 1, 2015
2.2 years
August 17, 2011
January 30, 2015
January 30, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in D-dimer
Patients will have D-dimer,for samples drawn on Day 1 and Day 3
Day 1 and Day 3
Change in Clinical Pain Scores
The primary pain assessment tool will be a 10-cm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS), with "0" corresponding to no pain at one end and "10" indicating the worst pain at the other.
Baseline to day 1
Change in Thrombin Generation Assay - Endogenous Thrombin Potential
Patients will have thrombin generation assay samples drawn on Day 1 and 3
Day 1 and Day 3
Change in Clinical Pain Scores
The primary pain assessment tool will be a 10-cm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS), with "0" corresponding to no pain at one end and "10" indicating the worst pain at the other.
Baseline to day 3
Study Arms (2)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORNormal saline solution
Dalteparin
EXPERIMENTAL5000 unites subcutaneously, Other Name: Fragmin
Interventions
Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), 5000 unites subcutaneously, administered by nursing staff once daily, Other Name: Fragmin
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Documented HgbSS or HgbS-beta0 thalassemia by previous hemoglobin electrophoresis,
- age greater than 18 years old, and
- admit diagnosis of vaso-occlusive crisis.
- Labs must be drawn within 36 hours of admission and randomization to treatment arm must occur during this time.
You may not qualify if:
- End stage renal disease (creatinine \>3.0 mg/dL),
- use of antiplatelet or anticoagulation medication for an alternative indication,
- use of steroids or immunosuppressive medications,
- platelet count less than 100 X 109/L,
- history or development of heparin induced thrombocytopenia, packed red blood cell transfusion in the past one month, or
- recent hospitalization with discharge within the past 1 week.
- Patients with re-admissions will not be enrolled again and will have no further samples drawn.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- Eisai Limitedcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations to our pilot study include the small study sample size, which leads to difficulty in determining significant differences in the outcome measurements.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Nirmish Shah, MD
- Organization
- Duke University Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nirmish Shah, MD
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2011
First Posted
August 19, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2013
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 16, 2015
Results First Posted
February 16, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-01