NCT00711698

Brief Summary

This research is being done to find out the best way to give narcotics for pain relief in adults with sickle cell disease and painful crisis. This study is a comparison of two ways of giving narcotics. The first way is what occurs now in the Emergency Acute Care Unit (EACU) where patients are given a single intravenous (iv) dose of a narcotic which is repeated by the nurse as needed to control the pain. The second way is to provide a single iv dose of narcotic and then allow the patient to push a button and receive one or more additional doses of narcotic when he/she thinks it is needed. Our hypothesis is that PCA will be a more effective way of controlling pain.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2007

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2007

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 7, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 9, 2008

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

March 24, 2017

Status Verified

March 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 7, 2008

Last Update Submit

March 22, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Decrease in admissions for those treated with a PCA in the ED v those that are given bolus narcotic dosing

    Measured at time of discharge from ED

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Length of stay

    Endpoints will be the time at which the decision for discharge from the EACU or transfer from the EACU to inpatient admission to the hospital is made

  • Total narcotic used

    Endpoints will be the time at which the decision for discharge from the EACU or transfer from the EACU to inpatient admission to the hospital is made

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this arm patients will be randomized to receive a bolus of narcotic followed by PCA.

Procedure: Patient controlled analgesia

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this arm patients will be randomized to the current standard of care of bolus narcotic treatment.

Drug: nurse-administered intermittent IV bolus opioid therapy (NAIBOD)

Interventions

Patients in this arm will be treated with a bolus of narcotic followed by PCA

1

In this arm patients will receive the current standard of care of IV bolus narcotic therapy

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Documented sickle cell disease
  • Signed consent in outpatient clinic or during a prior hospitalization
  • + years of age
  • Seen in the ED with sickle cell pain crisis - this will be based on patients chief complaint that they are in a VOC.
  • Requires IV administration of narcotics (has failed oral narcotic therapy at home)
  • Must be 2 weeks since their last randomization on this study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to the use of IV narcotics
  • Hypotension with systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤ 90
  • Respiratory rate ≤9
  • Altered mental status
  • Patient unable to understand how to use the PCA device
  • Patient unwilling to use PCA device
  • Pulse oximeter reading of ≤ 94% on room air
  • Patient is allergic to IV morphine \& hydromorphone \& fentanyl.
  • Patient is allergic to oral hydromorphone \& morphine \& oxycodone
  • Patient has been randomized on this study 3 times before

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkins Hospital

Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anemia, Sickle CellVaso-Occlusive Crises

Interventions

Analgesia, Patient-Controlled

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anemia, Hemolytic, CongenitalAnemia, HemolyticAnemiaHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemoglobinopathiesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnalgesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Sophie Lanzkron, MD

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2008

First Posted

July 9, 2008

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion

September 1, 2009

Study Completion

September 1, 2009

Last Updated

March 24, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-03

Locations