Study of Rufinamide in Pediatric Subjects 1 to Less Than 4 Years of Age With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome Inadequately Controlled With Other Anti-epileptic Drugs
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Study to Evaluate the Cognitive Development Effects and Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Adjunctive Rufinamide Treatment in Pediatric Subjects 1 to Less Than 4 Years of Age With Inadequately Controlled Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
37
7 countries
47
Brief Summary
This study was designed to evaluate the cognitive effect, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of rufinamide on Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) inadequately controlled in pediatric participants already taking other anti-epileptic drugs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2011
Typical duration for phase_3
47 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 2, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 2, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 6, 2019
CompletedAugust 6, 2019
February 1, 2016
4.4 years
July 27, 2011
May 27, 2019
July 12, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problem T-scores at the End of 2-year Treatment Period
CBCL: 99-item questionnaire measures specific behavioral problems or developmental delays, answered by a parent/legal guardian or suitable caregiver. Each item were rated using 3-point scale (0=Not True, 1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very True/ Often True) to indicate how often or typical the behavior was. The 99 items were combined to yield scores for 8 problem area scales (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, withdrawn, sleep problems, attention problems, aggressive behavior, and other problems) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw scores are converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to the normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.
End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)
Change From Baseline in CBCL Total Problem T-Scores at End of 2-year Treatment Period
CBCL: 99-item questionnaire measures specific behavioral problems or developmental delays, answered by a parent/legal guardian or suitable caregiver. Each item were rated using 3-point scale (0=Not True, 1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very True/ Often True) to indicate how often or typical the behavior was. The 99 items were combined to yield scores for 8 problem area scales (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, withdrawn, sleep problems, attention problems, aggressive behavior, and other problems) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw scores are converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to the normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.
Baseline and End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)
Other Outcomes (8)
Time to Withdrawal From Treatment Due to an Adverse Event or Lack of Efficacy
Baseline up to the End of the Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)
Percent Change in Total Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days
Baseline up to End of the Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)
Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days
Baseline up to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Rufinamide
ACTIVE COMPARATORAny other approved AED
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Rufinamide up to 45 mg/kg/day, in 2 divided doses, administered as oral suspension (40 mg/mL) as an add-on to the subject's existing regimen of 1-3 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)
Any other approved AED: any other approved AED of the investigator's choice as an add-on to the subject's existing regimen of 1-3 anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of LGS, which might include the presence of a slow background electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythm, slow spikes-waves pattern (less than 3 Hz), the presence of polyspikes; care should be taken not to include benign myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, atypical benign partial epilepsy (pseudo-Lennox syndrome), or continuous spike-waves of slow sleep (CSWS).
- On a fixed and documented dose of one to three concomitant regionally approved antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to randomization with an inadequate response to treatment.
- Consistent seizure documentation (i.e., no uncertainty of the presence of seizures) during the pre-randomization phase.
You may not qualify if:
- Familial short QT syndrome
- Prior treatment with rufinamide within 30 days of baseline visit or discontinuation of rufinamide treatment due to safety issues related to rufinamide
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Eisai Inc.lead
Study Sites (47)
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
Unknown Facility
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Unknown Facility
Gulf Breeze, Florida, 32561, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States
Unknown Facility
Wellington, Florida, 33414, United States
Unknown Facility
Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States
Unknown Facility
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States
Unknown Facility
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
Unknown Facility
Gibbsboro, New Jersey, 08026, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Akson, Ohio, 44308, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, 78723, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States
Unknown Facility
Norfolk, Virginia, 23510, United States
Unknown Facility
Calgary, Alberta, T2T 5C7, Canada
Unknown Facility
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, M2K 2W2, Canada
Unknown Facility
Saskatoon, S7N 0W8, Canada
Unknown Facility
Bron, France
Unknown Facility
Marseille, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Ambelokipi Athens, Greece
Unknown Facility
Pátrai, Greece
Unknown Facility
Pendeli Athens, Greece
Unknown Facility
Thessaloniki, Greece
Unknown Facility
Mantova, MN, Italy
Unknown Facility
Calambrone, PI, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pisa, PI, Italy
Unknown Facility
Pavia, PV, Italy
Unknown Facility
Mantova, 46100, Italy
Unknown Facility
Roma, '00165, Italy
Unknown Facility
Salerno, 84131, Italy
Unknown Facility
Elblag, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Kielce, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Rzeszów, 35-301, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, South Africa
Related Publications (4)
Brigo F, Jones K, Eltze C, Matricardi S. Anti-seizure medications for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 7;4(4):CD003277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003277.pub4.
PMID: 33825230DERIVEDAuvin S, Williams B, McMurray R, Kumar D, Perdomo C, Malhotra M. Novel seizure outcomes in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Post hoc analysis of seizure-free days in rufinamide Study 303. Epilepsia Open. 2019 Mar 13;4(2):275-280. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12314. eCollection 2019 Jun.
PMID: 31168494DERIVEDArzimanoglou A, Ferreira J, Satlin A, Olhaye O, Kumar D, Dhadda S, Bibbiani F. Evaluation of long-term safety, tolerability, and behavioral outcomes with adjunctive rufinamide in pediatric patients (>/=1 to <4 years old) with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Final results from randomized study 303. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2019 Jan;23(1):126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
PMID: 30309816DERIVEDArzimanoglou A, Ferreira JA, Satlin A, Mendes S, Williams B, Critchley D, Schuck E, Hussein Z, Kumar D, Dhadda S, Bibbiani F. Safety and pharmacokinetic profile of rufinamide in pediatric patients aged less than 4 years with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: An interim analysis from a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016 May;20(3):393-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
PMID: 26805435DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Eisai Medical Services
- Organization
- Eisai Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexis Arzimanoglou Arzimanoglou
Hopital Femme-Mere-Enfant Service D'Epilepsie -5eme etage 59 Boulevard Pinel Bron, France
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
- Expanded Access
- Yes
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2011
First Posted
July 29, 2011
Study Start
June 16, 2011
Primary Completion
November 2, 2015
Study Completion
November 2, 2015
Last Updated
August 6, 2019
Results First Posted
August 6, 2019
Record last verified: 2016-02