NCT01405053

Brief Summary

This study was designed to evaluate the cognitive effect, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of rufinamide on Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) inadequately controlled in pediatric participants already taking other anti-epileptic drugs.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
37

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2011

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
7 countries

47 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 16, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 27, 2011

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 29, 2011

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 2, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 2, 2015

Completed
3.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 6, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 6, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

4.4 years

First QC Date

July 27, 2011

Results QC Date

May 27, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Central Nervous System

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problem T-scores at the End of 2-year Treatment Period

    CBCL: 99-item questionnaire measures specific behavioral problems or developmental delays, answered by a parent/legal guardian or suitable caregiver. Each item were rated using 3-point scale (0=Not True, 1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very True/ Often True) to indicate how often or typical the behavior was. The 99 items were combined to yield scores for 8 problem area scales (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, withdrawn, sleep problems, attention problems, aggressive behavior, and other problems) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw scores are converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to the normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.

    End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)

  • Change From Baseline in CBCL Total Problem T-Scores at End of 2-year Treatment Period

    CBCL: 99-item questionnaire measures specific behavioral problems or developmental delays, answered by a parent/legal guardian or suitable caregiver. Each item were rated using 3-point scale (0=Not True, 1=Somewhat/Sometimes True, 2=Very True/ Often True) to indicate how often or typical the behavior was. The 99 items were combined to yield scores for 8 problem area scales (emotionally reactive, anxious/depressed, somatic complaints, withdrawn, sleep problems, attention problems, aggressive behavior, and other problems) and 3 summary scores (internalizing, externalizing, and total problems). Total Problem score was sum of all the problem areas plus 1 additional item, ranging from 0 to 198. Total raw scores are converted to t-scores with mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. T-scores were standardized test scores that indicate same degree of elevation in problems relative to the normative sample of peers. Higher scores were indicative of more problems.

    Baseline and End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)

Other Outcomes (8)

  • Time to Withdrawal From Treatment Due to an Adverse Event or Lack of Efficacy

    Baseline up to the End of the Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)

  • Percent Change in Total Seizure Frequency Per 28 Days

    Baseline up to End of the Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)

  • Percent Change in Seizure Frequency by Individual Seizure Type Per 28 Days

    Baseline up to End of Treatment Period (up to approximately Week 106)

  • +5 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Rufinamide

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Rufinamide

Any other approved AED

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Any other approved Antiepileptic Drug

Interventions

Rufinamide up to 45 mg/kg/day, in 2 divided doses, administered as oral suspension (40 mg/mL) as an add-on to the subject's existing regimen of 1-3 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)

Rufinamide

Any other approved AED: any other approved AED of the investigator's choice as an add-on to the subject's existing regimen of 1-3 anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs)

Any other approved AED

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Year - 3 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of LGS, which might include the presence of a slow background electroencephalogram (EEG) rhythm, slow spikes-waves pattern (less than 3 Hz), the presence of polyspikes; care should be taken not to include benign myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, atypical benign partial epilepsy (pseudo-Lennox syndrome), or continuous spike-waves of slow sleep (CSWS).
  • On a fixed and documented dose of one to three concomitant regionally approved antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for a minimum of 4 weeks prior to randomization with an inadequate response to treatment.
  • Consistent seizure documentation (i.e., no uncertainty of the presence of seizures) during the pre-randomization phase.

You may not qualify if:

  • Familial short QT syndrome
  • Prior treatment with rufinamide within 30 days of baseline visit or discontinuation of rufinamide treatment due to safety issues related to rufinamide

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (47)

Unknown Facility

San Diego, California, 92123, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gulf Breeze, Florida, 32561, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, 33609, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wellington, Florida, 33414, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Augusta, Georgia, 30912, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lexington, Kentucky, 40536, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Gibbsboro, New Jersey, 08026, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, 14642, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Akron, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Akson, Ohio, 44308, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Columbus, Ohio, 43205, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, 78723, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, 78258, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Norfolk, Virginia, 23510, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Calgary, Alberta, T2T 5C7, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Toronto, Ontario, M2K 2W2, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Saskatoon, S7N 0W8, Canada

Location

Unknown Facility

Bron, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Marseille, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Paris, France

Location

Unknown Facility

Ambelokipi Athens, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Pátrai, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Pendeli Athens, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Thessaloniki, Greece

Location

Unknown Facility

Mantova, MN, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Calambrone, PI, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Pisa, PI, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Pavia, PV, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Mantova, 46100, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Roma, '00165, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Salerno, 84131, Italy

Location

Unknown Facility

Elblag, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Kielce, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Poznan, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Rzeszów, 35-301, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Unknown Facility

Cape Town, South Africa

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Brigo F, Jones K, Eltze C, Matricardi S. Anti-seizure medications for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 7;4(4):CD003277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003277.pub4.

  • Auvin S, Williams B, McMurray R, Kumar D, Perdomo C, Malhotra M. Novel seizure outcomes in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Post hoc analysis of seizure-free days in rufinamide Study 303. Epilepsia Open. 2019 Mar 13;4(2):275-280. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12314. eCollection 2019 Jun.

  • Arzimanoglou A, Ferreira J, Satlin A, Olhaye O, Kumar D, Dhadda S, Bibbiani F. Evaluation of long-term safety, tolerability, and behavioral outcomes with adjunctive rufinamide in pediatric patients (>/=1 to <4 years old) with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Final results from randomized study 303. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2019 Jan;23(1):126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 27.

  • Arzimanoglou A, Ferreira JA, Satlin A, Mendes S, Williams B, Critchley D, Schuck E, Hussein Z, Kumar D, Dhadda S, Bibbiani F. Safety and pharmacokinetic profile of rufinamide in pediatric patients aged less than 4 years with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: An interim analysis from a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label study. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016 May;20(3):393-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome

Interventions

rufinamide

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epileptic SyndromesEpilepsyBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Results Point of Contact

Title
Eisai Medical Services
Organization
Eisai Inc.

Study Officials

  • Alexis Arzimanoglou Arzimanoglou

    Hopital Femme-Mere-Enfant Service D'Epilepsie -5eme etage 59 Boulevard Pinel Bron, France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR
Expanded Access
Yes

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2011

First Posted

July 29, 2011

Study Start

June 16, 2011

Primary Completion

November 2, 2015

Study Completion

November 2, 2015

Last Updated

August 6, 2019

Results First Posted

August 6, 2019

Record last verified: 2016-02

Locations