Surveillance and Proactive Intervention for Dialysis Access
SPIDA
A Multi Centre Randomized Controlled Trial of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Duplex Ultrasound Surveillance With Proactive Intervention Versus no Surveillance and Reactive Intervention for the Management of Stenosis in Arterio-venous Fistulae for Dialysis Vascular Access.
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Newly formed dialysis fistulae can often fail, and failure is usually due to narrowing of the blood vessels. Methods of detecting narrowing are available and, more importantly, can detect narrowings before a fistula fails. It is not known whether treating these narrowings will actually improve fistula survival or if the majority can be left alone. we wish to see if we can detect such narrowings with ultrasound scanning and if early detection and treatment improves patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 11, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2011
CompletedMarch 22, 2021
March 1, 2021
July 11, 2011
March 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative or secondary patency
This being the interval from the time of access placement until access abandonment, thrombosis, or the time of patency measurement including intervening manipulations (surgical or endovascular interventions) designed to re-establish functionality in thrombosed access.
within 6 months of fistula formation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Number of thrombosis events
within 6 months of fistula formation
Number of fistula failures
within 6 months of fistula formation
Number, type and technical success rate for elective interventions
within 6 months of fistula formation
Number, type and technical success rate of acute interventions
within 6 months of fistula formation
Study Arms (2)
Surveillance and proactive intervention
EXPERIMENTALControl and reactive intervention
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
Regular duplex ultrasound assessment of fistula from time of creation until 6 months post procedure with referral of all haemodynamically significant stenoses to further imaging and treatment
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Incident patients referred to vascular or transplant surgery departments for primary AV fistula formation for haemodialysis access.
- Ability to give informed written consent
- Aged over 18 at time of referral
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to give informed written consent
- Aged under 18 at time of referral
- Inability to attend follow-up appointments
- Previous arteriovenous access procedures in target limb
- Unsuitable for upper limb radiocephalic or brachiocephalic AVF formation
- Known thrombophilic or thrombotic pathology
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2011
First Posted
July 12, 2011
Last Updated
March 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03