Study Stopped
Slow enrollment due to multiple screen failures
Randomized Fistula Study
Prospective Randomized Trial of Fistula vs. Forearm AV Graft in Patients With Poor Venous Access; Protocol #3, Version 1
1 other identifier
interventional
6
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare two treatment strategies for establishing dialysis access in patients with unsuitable forearm veins for the standard forearm primary radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula also known as the Brescia-Cimino fistula.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 16, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedMarch 11, 2016
March 1, 2016
2.1 years
December 12, 2008
March 10, 2016
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary endpoint will be the rate of composite adverse events at one year with follow-up to 3 years. Data will be tabulated every 6 months.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Secondary endpoints: Primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency at 1 and 3 years
3 years
Death due to access-related illness
3 years
Death due to any cause
3 Years
New central venous stenosis or occlusion
3 years
Steal syndrome
3 years
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
1 Alternative Fistula
ACTIVE COMPARATOR2 Forearm AV Graft
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Performing other autogenous AV fistulas which include various options such as brachiocephalic AV fistula, basilic or brachial vein transpositions or a variety of other strategies to maintain a primary access. The advantage would be to maintain an autogenous all venous access with less risk of infection and thrombosis.
a) ePTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) bridge AV graft typically anastomosed in the proximal forearm to the radial or brachial artery and to an antecubital vein. The advantages include a quick maturation of 2-3 weeks, excellent flow rates and high technical success rates. Although secondary patency rates approach 80% at one year postoperatively, disadvantages include a more involved surgical procedure, a lower primary patency than a well functioning AV fistula, and higher revision and infection rates.4, 5
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject must be \> 18 years of age, male or female
- Subject requires creation of dialysis access secondary to ESRD in the opinion of the referring nephrologist
- Target arm may have a failed radiocephalic fistula
- Contralateral failed or failing access may exist
- The subject must sign a written informed consent, prior to the procedure, using a form that is approved by the local Institutional Review Board.
You may not qualify if:
- To participate in this study, the subject may NOT HAVE any of the following at enrollment to the study:
- Target arm has existing forearm AV graft, either functional or non-functional
- Target arm has existing fistula, either functional or non-functional, other than a radio-cephalic at the wrist
- Target arm has documented subclavian vein occlusion
- Target arm has obviously suitable cephalic vein and radial artery for a primary radiocephalic fistula
- Target arm has no superficial veins existing as options for primary access. If so, a second surgeon will review the ultrasound to confirm
- Active local or systemic infection at the time of surgery
- Known hypercoagulable state (e.g., antithrombin III deficiency, antiphospholipid or anticardiolipin antibodies, Factor IV Leiden, circulating lupus anticoagulant, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, Protein C or S deficiency, prothrombin mutation or a history of recurrent deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism)
- Disseminated malignancy or other terminal condition where subject is expected to live less than 6 months.
- Previous randomization in this trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Navyash Gupta, MD
University of Pittsburgh Physicians
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2008
First Posted
December 16, 2008
Study Start
December 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
March 11, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-03