Study Stopped
Looking for funding opportunities
Regional Anesthesia for Arteriovenous Fistula
Effect of Sympathetic Blockade on the Success and Survival of Arteriovenous Fistula
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Once kidney function goes below 10 to 15 percent of normal, dialysis treatments or a kidney transplant are necessary to sustain life. One type of dialysis is hemodialysis which cleans blood by removing it from the body and passing it through a dialyzer, or artificial kidney. To maximize the amount of blood cleansed during hemodialysis treatments, there should be continuous high volumes of blood flow. A fistula used for hemodialysis is a direct connection of an artery to a vein. Once an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is created it is a natural part of the body. This is the preferred type of access because once the fistula properly matures and gets bigger and stronger; it provides an access with good blood flow that can last for decades. After the fistula is surgically created, it can take weeks to months before the fistula matures and is ready to be used for hemodialysis. There have been surgical factors identified; one of them being the anesthetic used which may cause a fistula not to survive. This study will look at comparing 3 anesthetic techniques: axillary block (AB) versus stellate ganglion (SGB) block+local anesthetic versus local anesthetic (LA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Dec 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 11, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 3, 2014
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedJune 10, 2026
June 1, 2026
2 years
November 11, 2014
June 8, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Arteriovenous fistula flow
Arteriovenous fistula in mL/min
1 hour post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in limb temperature pre-anesthetic and post-anesthetics
1 hour post-operatively
Duration of intraoperative procedure
3 hours post-operatively
Rate of conversion to general anesthetic
1 day post-operatively
Anesthesia-related adverse events
1 day post-operatively
Maturation time
2 months post-operatively
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Axillary Block with 0.5% Ropivicaine
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive an axillary block using an ultrasound-guided technique. After skin infiltration with 1 mL of 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge insulated needle is advanced in-plane from the cephalic aspect of the transducer toward the posterior aspect of the axillary artery. Prior to injection, the syringe is aspirated to confirm extra-vascular placement of the needle. 20 mL solution of 0.5% ropivicaine is then injected slowly, with syringe aspiration after every 5 mL injection to confirm extravascular placement.
Stellate Ganglion Block with 0.2% Ropivicaine
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive stellate ganglion block and local anesthetic using an ultrasound-guided technique.After skin infiltration with 1 mL of 2% lidocaine, a 22-gauge insulated needle is advanced in-plane from the lateral position toward the anterior aspect of longus colli muscle just posterior to the internal jugular vein. Prior to injection, the syringe is aspirated to confirm extra-vascular placement of the needle. 10 mL of 0.2% ropivicaine is then injected slowly, with syringe aspiration after every 5 mL injection to confirm extravascular placement.
Local anesthetic infiltration with 0.25% Bupivicaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive local anesthetic infiltration of 0.25% Bupivicaine at the surgical site which will last approximately 6 hours.
Interventions
Axillary blocks are regional anesthesia techniques that are sometimes employed as an alternative to general anesthesia for surgery of the shoulder, arm, forearm, wrist and hand. In this case, ultra-sound technique will be used.
Patients will receive local anesthetic infiltration of 0.25% Bupivicaine at the surgical site which will last approximately 6 hours.
A stellate ganglion block is an injection of local anesthetic in the sympathetic nerve tissue of the neck. These nerves are a part of the sympathetic nervous system. The nerves are located on either side of the voice box, in the neck
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with ESRD undergoing radio-cephalic AVF
You may not qualify if:
- Previous AVF procedures
- significant stenosis (\>50% diameter reduction)
- calcifications of radial artery or cephalic vein
- radial artery diameter \<1.6mm
- cephalic vein diameter \<2.0mm
- history of pre-existing unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy
- pre-existing unilateral phrenic nerve palsy
- coagulopathy or pre-existing conditions that require anticoagulants or anti-platelet therapies
- history of IV drug use
- documented allergic reactions to local anesthetics
- pregnancy
- morbid obesity.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McMaster Universitylead
- St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamiltoncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
Related Publications (3)
Allon M, Robbin ML. Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions. Kidney Int. 2002 Oct;62(4):1109-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2002.kid551.x.
PMID: 12234281BACKGROUNDHe GW, Yang CQ. Radial artery has higher receptor-mediated contractility but similar endothelial function compared with mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 May;63(5):1346-52. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00106-9.
PMID: 9146326BACKGROUNDFries A. [Environmental access to a rehabilitation center as a determinant of attitude to handicapped persons? A comparative empirical study of assumptions of the "contact hypothesis"]. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1991 Feb;30(1):28-37. German.
PMID: 1828300BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Turlough O'Hare, MD
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton/McMaster Univeristy
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 11, 2014
First Posted
December 3, 2014
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
June 10, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-06