Study Stopped
Did not pass set-up phase
Open Versus Percutaneous Insertion of CAPD Catheters
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Local Anaesthetic Percutaneous Insertion Versus General Anaesthetic Open Surgical Placement of Continuous Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters in a University Teaching Hospital
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Healthy kidneys clean your blood by removing excess fluid, minerals, and wastes. When your kidneys fail, harmful wastes build up in your body and your body may retain excess fluid. When this happens, you need treatment to replace the work of your failed kidneys. This may be with a dialysis machine using haemodialysis or with fluid in the abdomen or peritoneal dialysis. In peritoneal dialysis, a tube called a catheter is put in the abdomen wall and used to fill your abdomen with a cleansing liquid called dialysis solution. The walls of your abdominal cavity are lined with a membrane called the peritoneum, which allows waste products and extra fluid to pass from your blood into the dialysis solution. These wastes and fluid are removed from the body when the dialysis fluid is drained and replaced with a fresh solution. The tubes or catheters used to exchange the fluid are currently positioned using a general anaesthetic (with the patient awake) and an operation with a cut under the belly button. Newer techniques using local anaesthetic (with the patient awake and the area numbed) and requiring only a small cut in the skin have been used. No one has ever directly compared the two techniques. The investigators aim is to perform a direct comparison between the two techniques to look at the complications and time required for surgery and length of hospital stay required. The investigators will also look at the patients satisfaction and pain scores with each technique to help gather evidence as to which is likely to be the best technique to use from now on.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2015
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 2, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedJuly 22, 2019
July 1, 2019
3.4 years
December 1, 2009
July 18, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Catheter survival
Time to catheter removal for any reason.recorded as percentage inn situ at 6, 12,18,etc months post procedure.
Ongoing (recorded at 6 month intervals)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Peri operative complications (bleeding, bowel injury)
24 hrs post procedure
Mechanical Complication (drainage failure, displacement, fluid leak)
ongoing (reported at 30 days and monthly thereafter)
Infective complications (exit site, tunnel, peritonitis)
ongoing (reported at 30 days and monthly thereafter)
Operative time
Average of 2 hours post procedure
Technical Success of placement
Average of 2 hours post procedure
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Percutaneous insertion
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo undergo insertion of catheter using percutaneous technique under local anaesthetic
Open insertion
ACTIVE COMPARATORTo undergo insertion of catheter using open technique under general anaesthetic
Interventions
Insertion of CAPD catheter using percutaneous seldinger technique under local anaesthetic +/- sedation as required
Present technique of open insertion under general anaesthetic. Incision to lower abdomen and direct visualisation of catheter tip placement into pelvis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients referred to vascular consultants for CAPD catheter insertion
- Ability to give informed written consent
You may not qualify if:
- Previous abdominal surgery via midline incision
- Unfit for general anaesthetic
- Aged under 18 at time of referral
- Inability to give informed written consent
- Inability to attend follow up appointments
- Withdrawal criteria:
- Patient request
- Patient non compliance with study protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trustlead
- University of Hullcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, East Yorkshire, HU3 2JZ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Briggs VR, Jacques RM, Fotheringham J, Maheswaran R, Campbell M, Wilkie ME. Catheter insertion techniques for improving catheter function and clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 22;2(2):CD012478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012478.pub2.
PMID: 36810986DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ian C Chetter, MB ChB
University of Hull
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2009
First Posted
December 2, 2009
Study Start
February 1, 2015
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 22, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07