Clinical Comparison of Two Multifocal Contact Lenses Made of Silicone Hydrogel Materials
1 other identifier
interventional
109
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare visual performance measures between two multifocal contact lenses on presbyopic wearers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 13, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 3, 2012
CompletedAugust 3, 2012
June 1, 2012
2 months
June 9, 2011
June 28, 2012
June 28, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Corrected Distance Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Distance Visual Acuity
The participant read a Snellen chart at a 20-foot equivalent distance with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal distance eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.
1 week
Corrected Near Binocular Visual Measurement in Normal Illumination Reported as Binocular Near Visual Acuity
The participant read a Snellen chart at 40 centimeters with both eyes together while wearing study lenses. The Snellen acuity was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equated to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and was considered normal near eyesight. A positive logMAR value indicated poorer vision, and a negative value denoted better visual acuity.
1 week
Study Arms (2)
Lotrafilcon B / Comfilcon A
OTHERLotrafilcon B contact lenses worn first, with comfilcon A contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for one week each.
Comfilcon A / Lotrafilcon B
OTHERComfilcon A contact lenses worn first, with lotrafilcon B contact lenses worn second. Both products worn bilaterally on a daily wear basis for one week each.
Interventions
Commercially marketed, silicone hydrogel, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use.
Commercially marketed (France), silicone hydrogel, multifocal contact lens for daily wear use.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 35 years of age.
- Spectacle add of +0.50 to +2.50 diopters (inclusive).
- Currently wearing soft contact lenses at least 5 days per week and at least 8 hours per day.
- Able to be fit in both eyes with soft multifocal lenses in available powers.
You may not qualify if:
- Eye injury or surgery within 12 weeks of enrollment in trial.
- Currently enrolled in any clinical trial.
- Astigmatism of 1.00 diopter or more.
- Currently wearing excluded brands of multifocal lenses, as specified by protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- CIBA VISIONlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Stacie Cummings, O.D.
- Organization
- Alcon Research, Ltd.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Stacie Cummings, O.D.
Alcon Research
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2011
First Posted
June 13, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
August 3, 2012
Results First Posted
August 3, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-06