Persistence of Oral Tolerance to Peanut
LEAP-On
The Persistence of Oral Tolerance Induction to Peanut and Its Immunological Basis (ITN049AD)
1 other identifier
interventional
556
1 country
1
Brief Summary
ITN049AD (LEAP-On) Study is a continuation of the ITN032AD LEAP Study (NCT00329784). Peanut Allergy, a recognized public health concern, is a common and potentially life-threatening food allergy for which there is no treatment. ITN032AD (LEAP) Study evaluated whether early exposure to peanut promotes tolerance and provides protection from developing peanut allergy in children who are allergic to eggs or who have severe eczema. ITN049AD (LEAP-On) Study will evaluate persistent tolerance to peanut by assessing the effect of twelve months of cessation of peanut consumption in LEAP Study participants who consumed peanut and those who avoided peanut over the previous five years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started May 2011
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 6, 2017
CompletedMarch 10, 2017
January 1, 2017
4 years
June 2, 2011
November 8, 2016
January 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy (PA) at 72 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum
At 72 months of age, eligible participants were given an oral food challenge (oral intake of 5g of peanut protein in a single dose). Participants were considered to not have peanut allergy (PA) if they experienced no reaction following the food challenge. Those who did react were offered a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with a total of 13.7g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were considered to have PA if they experienced a reaction at any point during the dose escalation. For participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on the results of a SPT and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have PA.
72 months
Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy (PA) at 72 Months of Age - by Treatment Group
At 72 months of age, eligible participants were given an oral food challenge (oral intake of 5g of peanut protein in a single dose). Participants were considered to have no peanut allergy (PA) if they experienced no reaction following the food challenge. Those who did react were offered a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with a total of 13.7g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were considered to have PA if they experienced a reaction at any point during the dose escalation. For participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on the results of a SPT and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have PA.
72 months
Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy (PA) at 72 Months of Age - by Skin Prick Test Stratum in the Per Protocol Population
At 72 months of age, eligible participants were given an oral food challenge (oral intake of 5g of peanut protein in a single dose Participants were considered to have no peanut allergy (PA) if they experienced no reaction following the food challenge. Those who did react were offered a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with a total of 13.7g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were considered to have PA if they experienced a reaction at any point during the dose escalation. For participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on the results of a SPT and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have peanut allergy.
72 months
Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy (PA) at 72 Months of Age - by Treatment Group in the Per Protocol Population
At 72 months of age, eligible participants were given an oral food challenge (oral intake of 5g of peanut protein in a single dose Participants were considered to have no peanut allergy (PA) if they experienced no reaction following the food challenge. Those who did react were offered a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge with a total of 13.7g of peanut protein administered in increments. These participants were to have PA if they experienced a reaction at any point during the dose escalation. For participants for whom data from the oral food challenge were either inconclusive or not available, a diagnostic algorithm based on the results of a SPT and the values for peanut-specific IgE were used to determine whether or not a participant should be considered to have PA.
72 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of Participants With Peanut Allergy (PA) at 60- and 72-month Visits Within the Peanut Avoidance After Peanut Consumption Group
60 months and 72 months
Number of Peanut Avoidance After Peanut Consumption Group Participants With Peanut Allergy (PA) at 60- and 72-month Visits Within in the Per Protocol Population
60 months and 72 months
Study Arms (2)
Peanut avoidance after continuous peanut consumption
EXPERIMENTALThese participants were the peanut consumption group of the ITN032AD (LEAP) study
Continued peanut avoidance
EXPERIMENTALThese participants were the peanut avoidance group of the ITN032AD (LEAP) study
Interventions
All participants will be assigned to peanut avoidance as per United Kingdom (UK) public health recommendations and will avoid exposure to peanut protein during the study until the last study visit when they will receive the Oral Food Challenge.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All LEAP Study participants who are evaluable for peanut allergy at year 5 by LEAP (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00329784) Study criteria.
- Parent or guardian willing to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Unable or unwilling to comply with study intervention and procedures.
- Participation in other food allergy intervention trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Evelina Children's Hospital
London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Du Toit G, Roberts G, Sayre PH, Bahnson HT, Radulovic S, Santos AF, Brough HA, Phippard D, Basting M, Feeney M, Turcanu V, Sever ML, Gomez Lorenzo M, Plaut M, Lack G; LEAP Study Team. Randomized trial of peanut consumption in infants at risk for peanut allergy. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414850. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
PMID: 25705822BACKGROUNDSantos AF, Du Toit G, Lack G. Is the use of epinephrine a good marker of severity of allergic reactions during oral food challenges? J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):429-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.12.009. No abstract available.
PMID: 25956314BACKGROUNDGruchalla RS, Sampson HA. Preventing peanut allergy through early consumption--ready for prime time? N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):875-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1500186. Epub 2015 Feb 23. No abstract available.
PMID: 25705823BACKGROUNDDu Toit G, Sayre PH, Roberts G, Sever ML, Lawson K, Bahnson HT, Brough HA, Santos AF, Harris KM, Radulovic S, Basting M, Turcanu V, Plaut M, Lack G; Immune Tolerance Network LEAP-On Study Team. Effect of Avoidance on Peanut Allergy after Early Peanut Consumption. N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 14;374(15):1435-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514209. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PMID: 26942922RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Clinical Research Operations Program
- Organization
- DAIT/NIAID
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gideon Lack, MD
Evelina Children's Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2011
First Posted
June 6, 2011
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
May 1, 2015
Last Updated
March 10, 2017
Results First Posted
January 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
ITN049AD (LEAP-On) is a continuation of the ITN032AD LEAP Study. The plan is to share data in: 1.) ImmPort, a long-term archive of clinical and mechanistic data from DAIT-funded grants and contracts; and 2.)TrialShare, a clinical trials research portal developed by the Immune Tolerance Network.