A Study Being Conducted at Multiple Locations to Compare Safety and Efficacy of Three Different Regimens; (1) High-Dose Lenalidomide; (2) Lenalidomide + Azacitidine; or (3) Azacitidine in Subjects ≥ 65 Years With Newly-Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of a Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen or a Sequential Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Plus Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Regimen Versus an Azacitidine (Vidaza®) Regimen for Therapy of Older Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
1 other identifier
interventional
88
2 countries
30
Brief Summary
The study aim is to compare safety and efficacy of high-dose lenalidomide regimen, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide and an azacitidine in persons ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_2
30 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 19, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 4, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2018
CompletedJune 25, 2019
June 1, 2019
3.1 years
May 19, 2011
April 4, 2016
June 17, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Kaplan Meier Estimates for One Year Survival
One-year survival rate was defined as all deaths within one year from the date of randomization. All others censored at the at year 1 or date of discontinuation
Up to 24 months
Overall Survival
Overall Survival reported at the end of the study are for those participants who were alive at the end of the study
From date of randomization until the date of the first documented date of progression or date of death of any cause; the overall median follow-up for survivng participants was 4.1 months (range 0.2 to 54.8 months)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response.
Complete Response or Morphologic Incomplete Response data not analyzed.
Duration of Remission (DoR)
Duration of Remission (DoR) time frame not analyzed.
Cytogenetic Complete Remission Rate (CRc)
Cytogenetic Complete Remission timeframe was not analyzed.
Percentage of Participants With an Overall Response Rate (CR +CRi+ PR)
Overall response rate time frame was not analyzed.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-Free survival data and time frame was not analyzed.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Alive at One Year
Up to 12 months
Study Arms (3)
Lenalidomide in combination with azacitidine
EXPERIMENTALRepeated cycles of azacitidine 75 mg/m\^2/day subcutaneous (SC) on Days 1-7 and lenalidomide 50 mg/day by mouth (PO) on Days 8-28 followed by a 14-day break plus best supportive care
Lenalidomide - single agent
EXPERIMENTALLenalidomide 50 mg PO daily for 28 days for the first 2 cycles and lenalidomide 25 mg daily for 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg daily PO plus best supportive care
Azacitidine-single agent
EXPERIMENTALRepeated cycles of azacitidine 75mg/m\^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7 followed by a 21-day break plus best supportive care
Interventions
Azacitidine at 75 mg/m\^2/day subcutaneous on Days 1-7
Lenalidomide 50 mg PO daily x 28 days for the first 2 cycles then 25 mg PO daily x 28 days for the next 2 cycles followed by continuous 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 10 mg PO daily
The use of BSC was considered as concomitant treatment and must be documented as concomitant medication. BSC includes, but is not limited to, treatment with Red Blood Celll (RBC) or whole blood transfusions, fresh frozen plasma transfusions, platelet transfusions, antibiotic or antifungal therapy, and nutritional support
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), AML with antecedent hematologic disorder or therapy-related AML
- Male or female subjects aged ≥ 65
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- White blood cell (WBC) count ≤ 10 x 10⁹/L at screening
You may not qualify if:
- Previous treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, cytarabine or lenalidomide
- Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment of any kind for AML or prior use of targeted therapy agents.
- Suspected or proven acute promyelocytic leukemia
- Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
- Candidate for allogeneic bone marrow or stem cell transplantation
- AML antecedent hematologic disorder such as chronic myelogenous leukemia or myeloproliferative neoplasms
- Presence of malignant disease within the previous 12 months with exceptions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Celgenelead
Study Sites (30)
(210) University of Arizona Cancer Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724, United States
(180) University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093-0960, United States
(240) Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
(215) Hematology Oncology Medical Group
Orange, California, 92868, United States
(130) UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95857, United States
(200) Coastal Integrative Cancer Care
San Luis Obispo, California, 93401, United States
(125) University of Stanford
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
(115) University of Colorado Anschultz Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
(145) Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140, United States
(140) Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
(185) The University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205, United States
(175) University Lousiville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
(195) Tulane University Hospital Tulane Cancer Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70072, United States
(235) University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
(100) Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110-1093, United States
(150) Billings Clinic
Billings, Montana, 59101, United States
(165) Mount Sinai Medical Center New York
New York, New York, 10029-65749, United States
(160) The Western Pennsylvania Hospital- Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224-1791, United States
(205) Greenville Hospital System
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605, United States
(120) Avera Cancer Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
(230) Tennessee Oncology, PLLC
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States
(105) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9179, United States
(155) Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
(135) University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States
(402) Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2, Canada
(405) University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z1, Canada
(401) Cancer Care Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 0V9, Canada
(403) Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre - VG Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
(404) The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
(400) Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Medeiros BC, McCaul K, Kambhampati S, Pollyea DA, Kumar R, Silverman LR, Kew A, Saini L, Beach CL, Vij R, Wang X, Zhong J, Gale RP. Randomized study of continuous high-dose lenalidomide, sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide, or azacitidine in persons 65 years and over with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2018 Jan;103(1):101-106. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2017.172353. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
PMID: 29097499DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Accrual to the lenalidomide arm was stopped before ending accrual to the 2 other arms because of poor tolerability and no comparison of outcomes was planned.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Anne McClain, Senior Manager, Clinical Trial Disclosure
- Organization
- Celgene Corporation
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robert Gale, MD
Celgene
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2011
First Posted
May 24, 2011
Study Start
April 27, 2012
Primary Completion
May 19, 2015
Study Completion
May 15, 2018
Last Updated
June 25, 2019
Results First Posted
July 4, 2016
Record last verified: 2019-06