A Comparison of External Mechanical Work Between Different Prosthetic Feet
SEW
2 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Recent dysvascular and diabetic amputees as well as older, long-term traumatic amputees are at risk of functional decline, joint degeneration, skin breakdown and further limb loss due to the forces placed on the contralateral limb through prosthetic ambulation. If specialized prosthetic gait training and proper use of the appropriate prosthetic foot can decrease forces on the intact limb, the long term health and quality of life of veterans with amputations could be substantially improved. We will address two key questions: Key Question 1: After receiving specialized gait training and a new prosthetic socket, will subjects demonstrate differences in gait symmetry and external mechanical work between the bionic and conventional prosthetic feet, while performing various functional activities. Key Question 2: Can external mechanical work be used as a clinically friendly measure to differentiate between prosthetic feet?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2008
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2011
CompletedApril 25, 2011
February 1, 2011
1.8 years
April 19, 2011
April 22, 2011
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Symmetry in External Work
Work done by the intact and prosthetic limb
up to 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Self Report and Performance Based Assessment Instruments
up to 12 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Prosthetic Feet
EXPERIMENTALRandomized to 4 different prosthetic feet (SACH, SAFE, TALUX, and Proprio Foot)
Interventions
Each subject receives specialized functional prosthetic training
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and/or Females between the ages of 40 and 65. b. People with unilateral transtibial amputations for vascular reasons or from traumatic events.
- c. At the lowest level of function candidates will have the ability to use a prosthesis for ambulation on level surfaces at a fixed cadence.
- d. People with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and/or peripheral vascular disease leading to amputation or people who have been amputated as a result of trauma.
- e. People comfortably fitted with a prosthesis for a period of at least 6 months.
- f. Candidates who score within the range of 29 to 47 on the Amputee Mobility Predictor which would indicate that subjects achieved the minimum required score to be fitted with a prosthesis.
- g. Able to tolerate the testing protocol and would not fatigue at any time during testing.
- h. Men's shoe size should be between 7.5 (25 cm) and 12.5 (29 cm). i. Women's shoe size should be between 8.5 (25 cm) and 13.5 (29 cm).
You may not qualify if:
- People who weigh more than 255 pounds at baseline visit. People receiving renal dialysis b. People with severe cardiac or pulmonary disease limiting ability to exercise including angina or poorly controlled hypertension.
- c. People with neurological disorder such as or stroke that affecting ability to ambulate d. People with severe lower limb arthritis e. People with wound on non-amputated side f. People experiencing problems with prosthetic fit g. People with poor control of diabetes
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Miami VAHS
Miami, Florida, 33155, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ronald Tolchin, DO
Miami VAHS
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- FED
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2011
First Posted
April 25, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2008
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 25, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-02