NCT03027947

Brief Summary

The goals of this study are to provide sensory information to amputees and reduce phantom limb pain via electrical stimulation of the lumbar spinal cord and spinal nerves. The spinal nerves convey sensory information from peripheral nerves to higher order centers in the brain. These structures still remain intact after amputation and electrical stimulation of the dorsal spinal nerves in individuals with intact limbs and amputees has been demonstrated to generate paresthetic sensory percepts referred to portions of the distal limb. Further, there is recent evidence that careful modulation of stimulation parameters can convert paresthetic sensations to more naturalistic ones when stimulating peripheral nerves in amputees. However, it is currently unclear whether it is possible to achieve this same conversion when stimulating the spinal nerves, and if those naturalistic sensations can have positive effects on phantom limb pain. As a first step towards those goals, in this study, the investigators will quantify the sensations generated by electrical stimulation of the spinal nerves, study the relationship between stimulation parameters and the quality of those sensations, measure changes in control of a prosthesis with sensory stimulation, and quantify the effects of that stimulation on the perception of the phantom limb and any associated pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 5, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 23, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 16, 2017

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 4, 2021

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 8, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 12, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 years

First QC Date

October 5, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Phantom Limb PainLower-Limb AmputationElectrodesStimulationPainSensation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Stimulation perceptual thresholds to a variety of stimulus parameters

    Quantify the threshold (minimum charge and pulse rate) stimulus required to evoke sensory percepts during epidural spinal nerve stimulation.

    30 days

  • Stimulation neurophysiology thresholds to a variety of stimulus parameters

    Quantify the threshold (minimum charge and pulse rate) stimulus required to evoke neurophysiological responses during epidural spinal nerve stimulation

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Location of evoked sensory percepts

    30 days

  • Qualitative self-report of evoked sensations

    30 days

  • Change (reduction) in pain ratings

    30 days

  • Ability to use a prosthetic limb with neural signals

    30 days

Study Arms (1)

Spinal cord stimulation

EXPERIMENTAL

Spinal cord stimulator leads (2-3 leads) will be placed in the lumbar epidural space of lower limb amputees to determine if the patient experiences any pain reduction from spinal cord stimulation. Participants in this study receive spinal cord stimulation will be trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees that are at least six month post--amputation. Subjects will have varying levels of phantom limb sensation and pain, but should have no other significant neurological disorders.

Device: Spinal cord stimulator

Interventions

Spinal cord stimulator leads (2-3 leads) will be placed in the lumbar epidural space of lower limb amputees to determine if the patient experiences any pain reduction from spinal cord stimulation.

Spinal cord stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • have an amputation of at least one lower limb, at a level between the ankle and hip joints
  • be at least 6 months post-amputation at time of lead placement

You may not qualify if:

  • women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • has any serious diseases or disorders that affect ability to participate
  • currently receiving medications that may affect blood coagulation
  • allergic to contrast medium, or has kidney failure that could be exacerbated by contrast agent
  • implanted metallic devices that are not cleared for MRI

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Debbie

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15101, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.

    PMID: 18295618BACKGROUND
  • Etter K, Borgia M, Resnik L. Prescription and repair rates of prosthetic limbs in the VA healthcare system: implications for national prosthetic parity. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Nov;10(6):493-500. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.921246. Epub 2014 May 22.

    PMID: 24852068BACKGROUND
  • Raichle KA, Hanley MA, Molton I, Kadel NJ, Campbell K, Phelps E, Ehde D, Smith DG. Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(7):961-72. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0151.

    PMID: 19165686BACKGROUND
  • Deer TR, Grigsby E, Weiner RL, Wilcosky B, Kramer JM. A prospective study of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the relief of chronic pain. Neuromodulation. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):67-71; discussion 71-2. doi: 10.1111/ner.12013. Epub 2012 Dec 14.

    PMID: 23240657BACKGROUND
  • Liem L, Russo M, Huygen FJ, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Verrills P, Cousins M, Brooker C, Levy R, Deer T, Kramer J. A multicenter, prospective trial to assess the safety and performance of the spinal modulation dorsal root ganglion neurostimulator system in the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):471-82; discussion 482. doi: 10.1111/ner.12072. Epub 2013 May 13.

    PMID: 23668228BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Phantom LimbPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesPain, PostoperativePostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Lee Fisher, PhD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, School of Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2016

First Posted

January 23, 2017

Study Start

March 16, 2017

Primary Completion

March 4, 2021

Study Completion

September 8, 2021

Last Updated

April 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The research team may share de-identified data with scientists at other centers for the purpose of data analysis and collaboration. Research information and data may be shared with investigators conducting other research.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
Information may be shared while data is being recorded, analyzed, and/or prior to publication. Data may be available after manuscripts are published.
Access Criteria
Data may be shared through a restricted access portal created by the National Institutes of Health or directly with scientists at other centers under a data use agreement.

Locations