Effects of Wearing a Powered Ankle-Foot Prosthesis on Amputee Walking
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Amputees wearing a conventional prosthesis require 20-30% more metabolic energy to walk at the same speeds as non-amputees and this discrepancy is more apparent at faster walking speeds. Amputees choose to walk at speeds 30-40% slower than non-amputees. Preferred walking speed is likely influenced by elevated metabolic energy, but the underlying reason for slower preferred walking speeds is not fully understood. Unilateral amputees exhibit highly asymmetrical gait patterns that likely require more metabolic energy and impair functional mobility, increasing the risk of degenerative joint disease, osteo-arthritis and lower back pain. Improvements in prosthetic devices could enhance mobility in amputees, thus positively effecting rehabilitation and ambulation in veterans. A prosthesis that allows amputees to reduce metabolic energy would be especially useful for rehabilitation in older, ill individuals with reduced exercise capacities and could literally restore walking ability in people that are currently non-ambulatory. Hypotheses. Amputees wearing the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Powered Ankle-Foot (PAF) prosthesis will have a lower metabolic cost, faster preferred walking speed, and improved gait symmetry during walking than amputees wearing a conventional prosthesis and will have nearly the same metabolic cost, preferred walking speed, and gait symmetry during walking as age, gender, height, and weight matched non-amputees.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2009
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2014
CompletedFebruary 25, 2014
January 1, 2014
2.3 years
March 24, 2009
September 18, 2013
January 7, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Metabolic Cost of Transport
We measured and compared gross rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production using a portable metabolic analysis system (Cosmed K4b2, IT) while participants walked at five constance velocities (0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50 and 1.75 m/s) on a level treadmill (SoleFitness F85). We calculated average steady-state metabolic power in Watts (W) from 4-6 min of each trial using a standard equation. Then, we divided the metabolic power by each participant's weight and velocity to calculate the metabolic cost of transport (J/Nm).
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Preferred Walking Velocity
1 year
Trailing Leg Step-to-step Transition Work
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALPowered ankle-foot prosthesis and passive-elastic prosthesis
Non-amputee
EXPERIMENTALNon-amputee
Interventions
The powered ankle-foot prosthesis is comprised of a series-elastic actuator (SEA) and an elastic leaf spring. This technology has been previously developed for robotic and human rehabilitation applications. The SEA allows for precise force control of the ankle joint, thus mimicking the spring-like behavior of the human ankle, as well as providing adequate energy for forward progression of the body. From the early stance period to the mid-stance period of walking, the SEA will be controlled so that the ankle joint behaves like a spring. During the late stance period, the SEA will be employed to power the forward movement of the body. The elastic leaf spring will provide shock absorption during foot strike, energy storage during early stance, and energy return during late stance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- healthy adult volunteers, 10 unilateral trans-tibial amputees and 10 matched non-amputees, will be recruited and screened
- Amputees must be at least 1 year post-amputation, high-functioning (at least a K3 level of ambulation), and whose cause of amputation is either traumatic or vascular. Medicare defines a K3 level amputee as an ambulator who has the ability or potential for prosthetic ambulation with variable cadence, who has the ability to traverse most environmental barriers and who may have vocational, therapeutic, or exercise activity that demands prosthetic utilization beyond simple locomotion
You may not qualify if:
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Medical Center, Providence
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Alena Grabowski
- Organization
- Eastern Colorado Healthcare System
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alena Grabowski, PhD BA
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2009
First Posted
March 26, 2009
Study Start
March 1, 2009
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
January 1, 2013
Last Updated
February 25, 2014
Results First Posted
February 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-01