NCT00869947

Brief Summary

Amputees wearing a conventional prosthesis require 20-30% more metabolic energy to walk at the same speeds as non-amputees and this discrepancy is more apparent at faster walking speeds. Amputees choose to walk at speeds 30-40% slower than non-amputees. Preferred walking speed is likely influenced by elevated metabolic energy, but the underlying reason for slower preferred walking speeds is not fully understood. Unilateral amputees exhibit highly asymmetrical gait patterns that likely require more metabolic energy and impair functional mobility, increasing the risk of degenerative joint disease, osteo-arthritis and lower back pain. Improvements in prosthetic devices could enhance mobility in amputees, thus positively effecting rehabilitation and ambulation in veterans. A prosthesis that allows amputees to reduce metabolic energy would be especially useful for rehabilitation in older, ill individuals with reduced exercise capacities and could literally restore walking ability in people that are currently non-ambulatory. Hypotheses. Amputees wearing the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Powered Ankle-Foot (PAF) prosthesis will have a lower metabolic cost, faster preferred walking speed, and improved gait symmetry during walking than amputees wearing a conventional prosthesis and will have nearly the same metabolic cost, preferred walking speed, and gait symmetry during walking as age, gender, height, and weight matched non-amputees.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2009

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2009

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2009

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 26, 2009

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2011

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2013

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 25, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 25, 2014

Status Verified

January 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

March 24, 2009

Results QC Date

September 18, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 7, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Unilateral below the knee amputation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Metabolic Cost of Transport

    We measured and compared gross rates of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production using a portable metabolic analysis system (Cosmed K4b2, IT) while participants walked at five constance velocities (0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50 and 1.75 m/s) on a level treadmill (SoleFitness F85). We calculated average steady-state metabolic power in Watts (W) from 4-6 min of each trial using a standard equation. Then, we divided the metabolic power by each participant's weight and velocity to calculate the metabolic cost of transport (J/Nm).

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Preferred Walking Velocity

    1 year

  • Trailing Leg Step-to-step Transition Work

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Prosthesis

EXPERIMENTAL

Powered ankle-foot prosthesis and passive-elastic prosthesis

Device: Powered ankle-foot prosthesis

Non-amputee

EXPERIMENTAL

Non-amputee

Other: No device

Interventions

The powered ankle-foot prosthesis is comprised of a series-elastic actuator (SEA) and an elastic leaf spring. This technology has been previously developed for robotic and human rehabilitation applications. The SEA allows for precise force control of the ankle joint, thus mimicking the spring-like behavior of the human ankle, as well as providing adequate energy for forward progression of the body. From the early stance period to the mid-stance period of walking, the SEA will be controlled so that the ankle joint behaves like a spring. During the late stance period, the SEA will be employed to power the forward movement of the body. The elastic leaf spring will provide shock absorption during foot strike, energy storage during early stance, and energy return during late stance.

Prosthesis
Non-amputee

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • healthy adult volunteers, 10 unilateral trans-tibial amputees and 10 matched non-amputees, will be recruited and screened
  • Amputees must be at least 1 year post-amputation, high-functioning (at least a K3 level of ambulation), and whose cause of amputation is either traumatic or vascular. Medicare defines a K3 level amputee as an ambulator who has the ability or potential for prosthetic ambulation with variable cadence, who has the ability to traverse most environmental barriers and who may have vocational, therapeutic, or exercise activity that demands prosthetic utilization beyond simple locomotion

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Medical Center, Providence

Providence, Rhode Island, 02908, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Alena Grabowski
Organization
Eastern Colorado Healthcare System

Study Officials

  • Alena Grabowski, PhD BA

    VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2009

First Posted

March 26, 2009

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion

June 1, 2011

Study Completion

January 1, 2013

Last Updated

February 25, 2014

Results First Posted

February 25, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-01

Locations