Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Versus Total Mesorectal Excision in T2-T3s N0, M0 Rectal Cancer
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial for no Inferiority With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM) Versus Total Mesorectal Excision in T2-T3s N0, M0 Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
173
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The standard treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma is total mesorectal excision (TME). The technique involves a low anterior rectal or colo-anal resection, very often associated with a protective stoma or abdominal-perineal resection with permanent colostomy. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows access to tumors up to 20 cm from the anal margin, with minimal postoperative morbidity and mortality. Recent studies of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas consider TEM to be the technique of choice. However the treatment of T2 rectal cancers remains controversial. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT/RT) has achieved a concomitant reduction in local recurrence and an increase in survival. Hypothesis: Patients with rectal adenocarcinoma less than 10 cm from the anal margin and up to 4 cm in size, staged after endorectal ultrasound and MRI as T2 or superficial T3 N0-M0-N0-M0, who underwent surgery after preoperative local chemoradiotherapy (TEM), achieve effective results in terms of local recurrence similar to radical surgery (TME). OBJECTIVES: Primary: To compare the results of local recurrence at 2 years in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and TEM and in patients treated with conventional radical surgery (TME). Secondary: To analyse the 3-year survival results in patients treated with CT/RT. Methodology: Multicenter clinical trial in a calculated sample of 173 patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Aug 2010
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2021
CompletedNovember 23, 2021
November 1, 2021
7.3 years
March 3, 2011
November 15, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Local recurrence
To analyse the results for local recurrence after 2 years in patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and TEO, with patients treated with conventional radical surgery (TME).
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Chemoradiotherapy+TEM
ACTIVE COMPARATORPreoperative chemotherapy: capecitabine 825 mg/m2 every 12 hours orally, plus Radiotherapy (50.4 Gy). After 6-8 weeks, transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM)is done
Total Mesorectal Excision
OTHERStandard surgical treatment of T2 , T3s, N0, M0 rectal cancer
Interventions
Capecitabine 825 mg/m2 every 12 hours orally on days of radiotherapy
Radiotherapy was administered in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy 5 days a week according to standard schema. The total dose is 45 Gy plus a boost of 5.4 Gy to the tumor area
Standard surgical treatment of T2 , T3s, N0, M0 rectal cancer. Early after diagnosis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Rectal adenocarcinomas located 10 cm or less from the inferior anal verge measured using a rigid rectoscope at the time of the EUS.
- Preoperative staging by EUS and pelvic MRI of T2 or T3 superficial, N0. In case of disparity, the higher staging is considered as the definitive diagnosis.
- Tumours equal to or less than 4 cm of diameter maximum measured using colonoscopy, EUS or MRI. We use the highest score on both scores.
- ASA score III or less.
- Absence of distance metastasis as shown on abdominal CT.
You may not qualify if:
- Preoperative staging by EUS or pelvic MRI of T1, deep T3, T4 or N1.
- Presence of distance metastasis.
- Synchrony with other colorectal adenocarcinomas.
- Undifferentiated rectal adenocarcinomas or with presence of poor prognosis factors in preoperative biopsy.
- Patients with intolerance of preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
- Refusal to sign informed consent to enter the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Corporacion Parc Taulilead
- Fundación Olga Torrescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Corporació Parc Taulí
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208, Spain
Related Publications (6)
Serra Aracil X, Bombardo Junca J, Mora Lopez L, Alcantara Moral M, Ayguavives Garnica I, Darnell Marti A, Casalots Casado A, Pericay Pijaume C, Campo Fernandez de Los Rios R, Navarro Soto S. [Site of local surgery in adenocarcinoma of the rectum T2N0M0]. Cir Esp. 2009 Feb;85(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2008.09.007. Epub 2009 Feb 5. Spanish.
PMID: 19231466BACKGROUNDSerra-Aracil X, Vallverdu H, Bombardo-Junca J, Pericay-Pijaume C, Urgelles-Bosch J, Navarro-Soto S. Long-term follow-up of local rectal cancer surgery by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. World J Surg. 2008 Jun;32(6):1162-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9512-1.
PMID: 18338206BACKGROUNDSerra-Aracil X, Pericay C, Cidoncha A, Badia-Closa J, Golda T, Kreisler E, Hernandez P, Targarona E, Borda-Arrizabalaga N, Reina A, Delgado S, Espin-Bassany E, Caro-Tarrago A, Gallego-Plazas J, Pascual M, Alvarez-Laso C, Guadalajara-Labajo H, Otero A, Biondo S; TAUTEM Collaborative Group. Chemoradiotherapy and Local Excision vs Total Mesorectal Excision in T2-T3ab, N0, M0 Rectal Cancer: The TAUTEM Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025 Jul 1;160(7):783-793. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1398.
PMID: 40434784DERIVEDMotamedi MAK, Mak NT, Brown CJ, Raval MJ, Karimuddin AA, Giustini D, Phang PT. Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 13;6(6):CD002198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002198.pub3.
PMID: 37310167DERIVEDSerra-Aracil X, Pericay C, Badia-Closa J, Golda T, Biondo S, Hernandez P, Targarona E, Borda-Arrizabalaga N, Reina A, Delgado S, Vallribera F, Caro A, Gallego-Plazas J, Pascual M, Alvarez-Laso C, Guadalajara-Labajo HG, Mora-Lopez L. Short-term outcomes of chemoradiotherapy and local excision versus total mesorectal excision in T2-T3ab,N0,M0 rectal cancer: a multicentre randomised, controlled, phase III trial (the TAU-TEM study). Ann Oncol. 2023 Jan;34(1):78-90. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.160. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
PMID: 36220461DERIVEDSerra-Aracil X, Pericay C, Golda T, Mora L, Targarona E, Delgado S, Reina A, Vallribera F, Enriquez-Navascues JM, Serra-Pla S, Garcia-Pacheco JC; TAU-TEM study group. Non-inferiority multicenter prospective randomized controlled study of rectal cancer T2-T3s (superficial) N0, M0 undergoing neoadjuvant treatment and local excision (TEM) vs total mesorectal excision (TME). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Feb;33(2):241-249. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2942-1. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
PMID: 29234923DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Medical Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2011
First Posted
March 4, 2011
Study Start
August 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
October 1, 2021
Last Updated
November 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11