A Trial to Assess Robot-assisted Surgery and Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery in Patients With Mid or Low Rectal Cancer
COLRAR
1 other identifier
interventional
540
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study sets up the final study end point and three detailed goals as the following. The main objective of study: This trial is done to assess the safety and benefit of robotic resection compared with conventional laparoscopy-assisted resection for curative treatment of patients with cancer of the mid or low rectum. Detailed goal of study: The primary endpoint: This study is designed to assess whether robotic surgical system improves the quality of rectal cancer surgery, especially in total mesorectal excision quality and a circumferential margin positivity rate The secondary endpoint: This study aims to compare 3- and 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival after robot and laparoscopic resection of distal rectal cancer. This study will also assess the pelvic autonomic nerve preservation, short-term morbidity, pathological quality (i.e. number of harvested lymph node), local recurrence, and blood loss during surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jun 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_3
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedMarch 11, 2015
March 1, 2015
5.5 years
August 1, 2011
March 9, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Surgical quality based on pathological examination
A comparison of completeness of total mesorectal excision
up to 4 weeks after operation
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Postoperative morbidity
up to 30 dyas after operation
Pelvic autonomic nerve preservation (intraoperative confirmation of pelvic nerve preservation)
The day of operation
Change from Baseline in QLQ 30, IIEF-5(5-item Version of the International Index of Erectile Function), IPSS(International Prostate Symptom Score), FSFI(Female Sexual Function Index), and Wexner's scoring
up to 12months after operation
5-year overall survival rate
up to 5 yearsa after operation
5-year disease-free survival rate
up to 5 years after operation
Study Arms (2)
Robotic LAR
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals who underwent robot-assisted surgery for primary rectal cancer
Lap LAR
ACTIVE COMPARATORIndividuals who underwent laparoscopic surgery for primary rectal cancer
Interventions
da Vinci surgical system® (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eligibility rule of enrollment
- Rectal adenocarcinoma that were 10 cm or less from the anal verge
- at least 18 years old \& at most 80 years old
- Clinically diagnosed cT3N0-2 disease
- Clinical diagnosis of carcinoma involving a single rectal segment
- Patients with adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55% or higher measured by echocardiography
You may not qualify if:
- The presence of metastasis to the liver, lung, brain, bone, abdominal aortic lymph node, lateral pelvic wall lymph node and inguinal lymph node
- A past history of the cancer occurring in other body areas than the rectal cancer (except for a past history of the radical resection due to skin cancer)
- Severe cardiac diseases or failure
- Severe pulmonary diseases or dysfunction
- The presence of psychiatric diseases
- The concurrent presence of other severe medical diseases
- An ineligibility to participate in the clinical study based on the judgment of investigators from a legal perspective
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Gyu seog Choi
Daegu, 702-210, South Korea
Nam Kyu Kim
Seoul, 120-752, South Korea
Seon-Hahn Kim
Seoul, 136-705, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gyu seog Choi, M.D
Kyunpook National Univercity Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Colorectal Cancer Center
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2011
First Posted
August 25, 2011
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
March 11, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-03