Sedation of Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: Midazolam Versus Dexmedetomidine
1 other identifier
interventional
146
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this prospective randomized study is to compare the safety and efficacy of two strategies for sedation of critically ill patients submitted to mechanical ventilation: continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus intravenous bolus of midazolam. The two groups will be compared as to the incidence of of delirium, evaluated with the Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) and the percentage of time within the target sedation using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RAAS).Eligible patients will be 18 years or older intubated and mechanically ventilated for less than 48 hours prior to start of study drug and anticipated ventilation duration of at least 48 hours. Calculated sample size is 146 patients (73 patients in each group)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 8, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 9, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedDecember 9, 2010
November 1, 2010
11 months
December 8, 2010
December 8, 2010
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of delirium
Secondary Outcomes (1)
PERCENTAGE OF TIME WITHIN THE TARGET SEDATION
Study Arms (2)
DEXMEDETOMIDINE, SEDATION
ACTIVE COMPARATORMidazolam, sedation,
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients
You may not qualify if:
- pregnancy or lactation, severe liver disease, hearth rate less than 50, hypotension despite volemic repletion and vasoactive drug
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Sao Domingos
São Luís, Maranhão, 65060-100, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 8, 2010
First Posted
December 9, 2010
Study Start
November 1, 2010
Primary Completion
October 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
December 9, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-11