Comparing the Effect of Dexmedetomidine With Midazolam on Sedation, Oxidative Stress, and Microcirculation in Intensive Care Unit
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In intensive care unit, patients suffered pain and anxiety from mechanical ventilation, presence of endotracheal tube, central venous catheter, postoperative wound, and invasive procedures. Adequate analgesia and sedation can reduce pain and anxiety. However, traditional sedatives carry the risk of unstable hemodynamic status, respiratory depression, increased mechanical ventilation time, incidence of delirium, and length of ICU stay. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selec¬tive α2-adrenergic receptor agonist which causes sedative effects and reduces opioid requirements in the perioperative period. Memis et al had found that dexmedetomidine may prevent inflammatory effects in sepsis patients during sedation. Oxidative stress status is related to the inflammatory response. Moreover, oxidative stress may result in dysfunction of microcirculation. Dysfunction of microcirculation may cause vasoconstriction or microthrombosis, and it will impair tissue perfusion and result in organ dysfunction. The goal of this study is to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam on requirement of analgesics, weaning parameter, hemodynamic status, time of extubation, incidence of delirium, and length of ICU stay, oxidative stress status, and microcirculation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 22, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2011
CompletedNovember 16, 2012
November 1, 2012
9 months
April 20, 2009
November 15, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to extubation
hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
ICU Stay Weaning parameter
Hour
Study Arms (3)
Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALMidazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORDexmedetomidine, Midazolam
EXPERIMENTALCombination
Interventions
The loading dose of dexmedetomidine is 0.5 mcg/kg over 10 minutes as needed. Then, continuous infusion of 0.2-0.7 mcg/kg/h dexmedetomidine is used to maintain RASS between 0 to -3.
The loading dose of midazolam is 0.05 mg/kg over 10 minutes as needed. Then, continuous infusion of 20-300 mcg/kg/h midazolam is used to maintain RASS between 0 to -3.
The loading doses are dexmedetomidine 0.25 mcg/kg and 0.025 mg/kg of midazolam over 10 minutes. Then, continuous infusion of 0.1-0.7 mcg/kg/h dexmedetomidine and 10-300 mcg/kg/h midazolam is used to maintain RASS between 0 to -3.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient who is older than 18 years old and less than 80 years old
- Patient who is admitted to intensive care unit with artery line
- Patient's hemodynamic status is stable under adequate management and absence of signs of shock
- Patient who has understood the inform consent and agree to participate this study
You may not qualify if:
- Patient's hemodynamic status is unstable in spite of adequate management or presence of signs of shock
- Patient who has a past history of allergy to study drugs
- Patient who has renal failure or requires renal replacement therapy
- Patient who has liver cirrhosis or liver failure
- Patient who has participated in any other investigational study of other drugs currently
- Female patient who is pregnant or considers breast feeding currently
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan, 100, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yu-Chang Yeh, M.D
National Taiwan University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2009
First Posted
April 22, 2009
Study Start
July 1, 2010
Primary Completion
April 1, 2011
Last Updated
November 16, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-11