Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine as Premedication
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as Intramuscular Premedication for Suspension Laryngoscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Many studies have been conducted for the feasibility of using dexmedetomidine as premedication. However, bradycardia and hypotension frequently occurred following the premedication with dexmedetomidine, either via intramuscular or intravenous route. This is particularly true when using a high dose of dexmedetomidine: a intramuscular dose over 2 μg•kg-1 or a intravenous dose over 1 μg•kg-1 can elicit marked decreases in heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure. Subsequent studies using high-dose dexmedetomidine further revealed the potential impact of its detrimental haemodynamic profile on clinical outcomes. Most studies using high-dose dexmedetomidine were predominantly adopted with the dose-finding study performed by Aho and colleague, whom reported that 2.5 μg•kg-1 dose of intramuscular dexmedetomidine was comparably sedative and anxiolytic to 0.08 mg•kg-1 midazolam. However, few investigations have addressed the clinical effects of low-dose dexmedetomidine as premedication. Considering modern anaesthesia has advanced a long way towards eliminating the routine need for a deep preoperative sedation. It has, therefore, become desirable to asses dexmedetomidine as an effective premedication using a moderate sedative dose to minimize its undesired hemodynamic effects. We set a prospective study to compare the sedative, haemodynamic, adjuvant anaesthetic effects and patient's satisfaction of low-dose dexmedetomidine (1μg•kg-1) with midazolam (0.03 mg•kg-1), the most commonly used premedication, used as an intramuscular injective administration in patients undergoing suspension laryngoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Mar 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedSeptember 9, 2013
September 1, 2013
7 months
September 1, 2013
September 7, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Perioperative heart rate response
Participants will be monitored for the duration of anesthesia and recovery, an expected average of 2 hours.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sedation
Participants will be monitored for the duration of anesthesia and recovery, an expected average of 2 hours.
Adjuvant anesthesia effect
Participants will be monitored for the duration of anesthesia, an expected average of half an hour.
Patient's over-all satisfaction
On leaving the post-care unite, an expected average of 2 min.
Other Outcomes (1)
Mean arterial blood pressure
Participants will be monitored for the duration of anesthesia and recovery, an expected average of 2 hours.
Study Arms (2)
Dexmedetomidine
EXPERIMENTALdexmedetomidine 1μg•kg-1
midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATORmidazolam 0.03 mg•kg-1
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients aged 18-55 years old, American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I, scheduled for elective suspension laryngoscopic surgery of benign vocal fold lesions.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with neurological deficits
- Pregnancy
- Imprisonment
- Morbid obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg•m-2)
- Preoperative heart rate \<45 beats•min-1
- Second or third degree atrioventricular block
- Antihypertensive medication with α-methyldopa, clonidine or other α2-adrenergic agonist
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Affiliated First People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Medical University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510180, China
Related Publications (8)
Jayaraman L, Sinha A, Punhani D. A comparative study to evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral alprazolam as a premedication agent in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;29(2):179-82. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.111680.
PMID: 23878437RESULTGupta K, Jain M, Gupta PK, Rastogi B, Saxena SK, Manngo A. Dexmedetomidine premedication for fiberoptic intubation in patients of temporomandibular joint ankylosis: A randomized clinical trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Jul;6(3):219-23. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.101211.
PMID: 23162393RESULTMowafi HA, Aldossary N, Ismail SA, Alqahtani J. Effect of dexmedetomidine premedication on the intraocular pressure changes after succinylcholine and intubation. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):485-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen020. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
PMID: 18285392RESULTPeden CJ, Cloote AH, Stratford N, Prys-Roberts C. The effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine premedication on the dose requirement of propofol to induce loss of consciousness in patients receiving alfentanil. Anaesthesia. 2001 May;56(5):408-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2001.01553.x.
PMID: 11350323RESULTTaittonen MT, Kirvela OA, Aantaa R, Kanto JH. Effect of clonidine and dexmedetomidine premedication on perioperative oxygen consumption and haemodynamic state. Br J Anaesth. 1997 Apr;78(4):400-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.4.400.
PMID: 9135361RESULTErkola O, Korttila K, Aho M, Haasio J, Aantaa R, Kallio A. Comparison of intramuscular dexmedetomidine and midazolam premedication for elective abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 1994 Oct;79(4):646-53. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199410000-00006.
PMID: 7943770RESULTVirkkila M, Ali-Melkkila T, Kanto J, Turunen J, Scheinin H. Dexmedetomidine as intramuscular premedication for day-case cataract surgery. A comparative study of dexmedetomidine, midazolam and placebo. Anaesthesia. 1994 Oct;49(10):853-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1994.tb04257.x.
PMID: 7802178RESULTSun Y, Liu C, Zhang Y, Luo B, She S, Xu L, Ruan X. Low-dose intramuscular dexmedetomidine as premedication: a randomized controlled trial. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Dec 18;20:2714-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.891051.
PMID: 25529851DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiangcai Ruan, MD, PhD.
Affiliated First People's Hospital of Guangzhou, Guangzhou Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Deputy Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2013
First Posted
September 9, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
September 9, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09