NCT01221155

Brief Summary

Manual treatment offers benefit to some patients suffering from back pain but little is known about which of the many tissue layers are affected. This study will help identify which tissues may be stimulated sufficiently to be a source for the clinical effects of treatment and to prioritize future work to understand mechanisms of back pain and to improve care. Current soft-tissue ultrasound elastography techniques, under static condition, will be extended to quantify relative displacement and strains(active and passive)across the depth of tissue strata that arise from small amplitude motions during continuous passive motion clinical procedures and in weight bearing postures. Relative movement of the stratified layers of the back, from treatment and task-generated perturbations, will enable the elastography interrogation of the tissue.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
101

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2007

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2007

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2010

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 14, 2010

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2012

Status Verified

September 1, 2012

First QC Date

September 23, 2010

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Musculoskeletal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • The quantitative tissue displacement and strains.

    These parameters may be considered as total cumulative displacement and strain over the recording interval or smaller epochs sequentially over time. After analysis completion, power and effect sizes will be calculated for the various parameters being studied. In cases where statistical power is found to be insufficient, calculation for appropriate sample size estimates will be compiled to guide future work. Secondary analyses will explore linear vs non-linear representations of the data. The best fit of linear/nonlinear correlations will be used to describe all muscle relationships.

    baseline and 6 weeks

  • Timing of change in the relative myoelectric activity.

    These parameters may be considered as total cumulative displacement and strain over the recording interval or smaller epochs sequentially over time. After analysis completion, power and effect sizes will be calculated for the various parameters being studied. In cases where statistical power is found to be insufficient, calculation for appropriate sample size estimates will be compiled to guide future work. Secondary analyses will explore linear vs non-linear representations of the data. The best fit of linear/nonlinear correlations will be used to describe all muscle relationships.

    baseline and 6 weeks

  • Strain ratio in the context of a series of motions in upright/recumbent postures and in healthy/chronic low back pain volunteers.

    These parameters may be considered as total cumulative displacement and strain over the recording interval or smaller epochs sequentially over time. After analysis completion, power and effect sizes will be calculated for the various parameters being studied. In cases where statistical power is found to be insufficient, calculation for appropriate sample size estimates will be compiled to guide future work. Secondary analyses will explore linear vs non-linear representations of the data. The best fit of linear/nonlinear correlations will be used to describe all muscle relationships.

    baseline and 6 weeks

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Group 1: Fifteen healthy volunteers from Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC) community. Group 2: 30 Subjects (15 healthy volunteers and 15 chronic low back pain)

You may qualify if:

  • years old
  • a clean history
  • no episode of disabling back pain
  • no episode of disabling leg pain
  • no episode within the prior 90 days will be required Back Pain Subjects
  • experiencing continuous episodes of low back pain within the prior 90 days
  • experiencing recurring episodes of low back pain within the prior 90 days
  • have pain at \>3.0 on Visual Analogue Scale

You may not qualify if:

  • history of diabetes
  • history of neuromuscular disease
  • history of scoliosis apparent on inspection
  • a bleeding disorder
  • collagen vascular disease
  • corticosteroid therapy
  • extensive scarring or dermatological abnormalities, including adhesive tape sensitivity
  • women who are pregnant or have active menstruation will be excluded to avoid positional discomfort.
  • pain radiating below the knee or loss of motor, bowel or bladder control
  • Volunteers taking anti-inflammatory or antihistamine medications will be asked to discontinue their use 3 days before testing.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

Toronto, Ontario, M2H 3J1, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • John J. Triano, DC, PhD

    Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2010

First Posted

October 14, 2010

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Study Completion

December 1, 2011

Last Updated

September 25, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-09

Locations