Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Usual Care for ED Patients With Mechanical Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Erector Spinae plane (ESP) block, a nerve block, to usual care in emergency department patients with back pain. The main question it aims to answer: Is the ESP block superior to usual care in the treatment of back pain in the emergency department? Participants will be randomly assigned to the ESP or the usual care group. Pain improvement at the time of emergency department discharge will be compared.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 8, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 16, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2023
CompletedAugust 8, 2023
August 1, 2023
3.4 years
July 6, 2023
August 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numeric Verbal Pain Score (NVPS) reduction at emergency department discharge
The NVPS is an 11-point verbal pain scale from 0 to 10 with 0 representing no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.
Numeric verbal pain score (NVPS) at time of randomization compared with NVPS at time of discharge from the emergency department up to 24 hours after randomization.
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Number of patients requiring post randomization Emergency department (ED) opiate analgesia analgesia use
Time of randomization to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after randomization.
Emergency department (ED) length of stay.
Time of ED triage to time of ED discharge up to 24 hours after triage.
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score reduction from baseline
Time of randomization compared to 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post Emergency department visit
Number of patients requiring post Emergency department discharge opiate analgesia use
Date of randomization to 1 day after randomization, 1 day after randomization to 1 week after randomization, 1week after randomization to 1 month after randomization, 1 month after randomization to 3 months after randomization.
Post Emergency department (ED) discharge Numeric Verbal Pain Score (NVPS)
1 day after randomization, 1 week after randomization, 1 month after randomization, 3 months after randomization.
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ESP cohort
EXPERIMENTALRandomized to receive the ultrasound-guided ESP block.
Usual care cohort
ACTIVE COMPARATORRandomized to usual care as dictated by the treating emergency physician
Interventions
Utilizing the in line approach, a 22 gauge 3.5" spinal needle was guided the the tip of the transverse process corresponding to the area of maximal tenderness or central to the reported area of spasm. 1% lidocaine with epinephrine was used for skin anaesthesia and for hydro-localization of the needle tip on approach to the tip of the transverse process. Once the needle tip made contact with the transverse process, 2-3 ml of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine was injected to open the ESP plane. If there was no reported tachycardia after approximately 45 seconds, 20 ml of 0.25% bupivicaine was injected into the ESP plane.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- previous recipient of erector spinae plane block
- exam concerning for cauda equina syndrome
- current IV drug use
- organ transplant recipient
- history of or suspected bleeding diathesis
- current use of anticoagulants
- sepsis or soft tissue infection at site of the block within last three months
- pregnancy
- overt malignancy involving skin or underlying soft tissue at the site of block
- allergy to any of the research medications
- inability to participate in telephone follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Island Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Nanaimo Regional General Hospital
Nanaimo, British Columbia, V9S2B7, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Ho B, Fyfe-Brown R, Chopra S, McMeel K. The erector spinae plane block vs. usual care for treatment of mechanical back pain in the emergency department: a pilot study. CJEM. 2024 Aug;26(8):543-548. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00748-7. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
PMID: 39083200DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants in both cohorts had pink chlorhexidine skin prep and a dressing applied to the back. Research team members performing the telephone follow-up were blinded to treatment allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Emergency department staff physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 6, 2023
First Posted
August 8, 2023
Study Start
September 8, 2019
Primary Completion
January 16, 2023
Study Completion
January 16, 2023
Last Updated
August 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share