Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Pericardial Bioprosthesis, Model 3300TFX
1 other identifier
interventional
283
6 countries
13
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the long term safety and effectiveness of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Valves in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Oct 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 17, 2020
CompletedApril 17, 2020
April 1, 2020
10.9 years
July 26, 2010
February 6, 2020
April 7, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Subject's Percentage of Long Term Safety Performance
Long term safety performance will be evaluated by comparing the linearized yearly rates to the objective performance criteria (OPC) referenced in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1994 Draft Heart Valve Guidance. Expressed as the Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
31 days through 8 years post-implant
Number of Subject's in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 8 Year Post-Implant
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).
8 years post-implant
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 8 Years Post-Implant Compared to Baseline
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
8 Years post-implant
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Percent of Early Adverse Events
Events occurring within 30 days of procedure
Percentage of Late Adverse Events
Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant
Percent of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days
1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, 5 Years, 6 Years, 7 Years, and 8 Years post-implant
Subject's Average Peak Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant
8 years post-implant
Subject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.
8 years post-implant
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
CEP Aortic Bioprothesis, model 3300TFX
OTHERInterventions
Heart Valve Surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient requires, as indicated in the preoperative evaluation, a replacement aortic valve.
- The patient is an average or better operative risk.
- The patient is geographically stable and agrees to attend follow-up assessments at the hospital of surgical services for at least 8 years.
- The patient is 18 years or older.
- The patient has signed and dated the subject informed consent form prior to surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- The patient has any known non-cardiac life-threatening disease, which will limit the patient's life expectancy below 1 year.
- The patient presents with active endocarditis within the last 3 months.
- The patient has an abnormal calcium metabolism (e.g., chronic renal failure, hyperparathyroidism).
- The patient has an aneurismal aortic degenerative condition (e.g., cystic medial necrosis, Marfan's syndrome).
- The patient is pregnant or lactating.
- The patient is an intravenous drug abuser.
- The patient is currently a prison inmate.
- The patient is currently participating in a study of an investigational drug or device.
- The patient requires replacement of a native or prosthetic mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve.
- The patient requires a repair of the mitral or tricuspid valve with the use of an annuloplasty device.
- The patient was previously enrolled in the study.
- The patient had a prior mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve, mechanical valve, or annuloplasty ring that will remain in situ.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95819, United States
Cooper University Hospital
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
Morristown Memorial Hospital
Morristown, New Jersey, 09762, United States
Providence Heart & Vascular Institute
Portland, Oregon, 97225, United States
St. Marks Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124, United States
Universitatslinik fur Chirurgie
Innsbruck, 6020, Austria
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
St. Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
Liknik fur Herz und BefaBchirurgie Im Deuschen Herzzentrum
Munich, Lazarettstr, 36, Germany
Klinik fur Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefabchirurgie
Hanover, D-30625, Germany
Hospital Peutra de Hierro
San Martin de Porres 4, Madrid, CP-28035, Spain
Papworth Hospital NHS foundation Trust
Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CV23 3RE, United Kingdom
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Blackpool, Lancashire, FY8 8NR, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Wahlers TCW, Andreas M, Rahmanian P, Candolfi P, Zemanova B, Giot C, Ferrari E, Laufer G. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):177-183. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000509.
PMID: 29912142RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrey Nersesov, Sr. Director of Clinical Affairs, Surgical Structural Heart
- Organization
- Edwards Lifesciences, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 26, 2010
First Posted
July 28, 2010
Study Start
October 1, 2007
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 17, 2020
Results First Posted
April 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04