NCT01171625

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the long term safety and effectiveness of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna Ease Valves in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant procedures requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
283

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2007

Longer than P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease

Geographic Reach
6 countries

13 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2007

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 26, 2010

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2010

Completed
8.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2018

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 17, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 17, 2020

Status Verified

April 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

10.9 years

First QC Date

July 26, 2010

Results QC Date

February 6, 2020

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

PERIMOUNT, Aortic valve replacement/regurgitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Subject's Percentage of Long Term Safety Performance

    Long term safety performance will be evaluated by comparing the linearized yearly rates to the objective performance criteria (OPC) referenced in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1994 Draft Heart Valve Guidance. Expressed as the Number of late events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).

    31 days through 8 years post-implant

  • Number of Subject's in NYHA Functional Class I or II at 8 Year Post-Implant

    The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).

    8 years post-implant

  • Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class at 8 Years Post-Implant Compared to Baseline

    The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life. Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath). Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea. Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.

    8 Years post-implant

Secondary Outcomes (20)

  • Percent of Early Adverse Events

    Events occurring within 30 days of procedure

  • Percentage of Late Adverse Events

    Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 8 years post-implant

  • Percent of Subjects With Freedom From Serious Adverse Events (SAE) Post-implant > 30 Days

    1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, 5 Years, 6 Years, 7 Years, and 8 Years post-implant

  • Subject's Average Peak Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant

    8 years post-implant

  • Subject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient (mmHg) Measurements at 8 Years Post-implant.

    8 years post-implant

  • +15 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

CEP Aortic Bioprothesis, model 3300TFX

OTHER
Device: Implantation of CEP Magna Ease Model 3300TFX

Interventions

Heart Valve Surgery

Also known as: CEP Magna Ease MOdel 3300TFX
CEP Aortic Bioprothesis, model 3300TFX

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient requires, as indicated in the preoperative evaluation, a replacement aortic valve.
  • The patient is an average or better operative risk.
  • The patient is geographically stable and agrees to attend follow-up assessments at the hospital of surgical services for at least 8 years.
  • The patient is 18 years or older.
  • The patient has signed and dated the subject informed consent form prior to surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient has any known non-cardiac life-threatening disease, which will limit the patient's life expectancy below 1 year.
  • The patient presents with active endocarditis within the last 3 months.
  • The patient has an abnormal calcium metabolism (e.g., chronic renal failure, hyperparathyroidism).
  • The patient has an aneurismal aortic degenerative condition (e.g., cystic medial necrosis, Marfan's syndrome).
  • The patient is pregnant or lactating.
  • The patient is an intravenous drug abuser.
  • The patient is currently a prison inmate.
  • The patient is currently participating in a study of an investigational drug or device.
  • The patient requires replacement of a native or prosthetic mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve.
  • The patient requires a repair of the mitral or tricuspid valve with the use of an annuloplasty device.
  • The patient was previously enrolled in the study.
  • The patient had a prior mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve, mechanical valve, or annuloplasty ring that will remain in situ.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Mercy General Hospital

Sacramento, California, 95819, United States

Location

Cooper University Hospital

Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States

Location

Morristown Memorial Hospital

Morristown, New Jersey, 09762, United States

Location

Providence Heart & Vascular Institute

Portland, Oregon, 97225, United States

Location

St. Marks Hospital

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124, United States

Location

Universitatslinik fur Chirurgie

Innsbruck, 6020, Austria

Location

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

Location

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, V6Z 1Y6, Canada

Location

Liknik fur Herz und BefaBchirurgie Im Deuschen Herzzentrum

Munich, Lazarettstr, 36, Germany

Location

Klinik fur Herz-, Thorax-, Transplantations- und Gefabchirurgie

Hanover, D-30625, Germany

Location

Hospital Peutra de Hierro

San Martin de Porres 4, Madrid, CP-28035, Spain

Location

Papworth Hospital NHS foundation Trust

Papworth Everard, Cambridge, CV23 3RE, United Kingdom

Location

Blackpool Victoria Hospital

Blackpool, Lancashire, FY8 8NR, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Wahlers TCW, Andreas M, Rahmanian P, Candolfi P, Zemanova B, Giot C, Ferrari E, Laufer G. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):177-183. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000509.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery DiseaseAortic Valve DiseaseHeart FailureAortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve InsufficiencyGastroesophageal Reflux

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesHeart Valve DiseasesVentricular Outflow ObstructionEsophageal Motility DisordersDeglutition DisordersEsophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Andrey Nersesov, Sr. Director of Clinical Affairs, Surgical Structural Heart
Organization
Edwards Lifesciences, LLC

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2010

First Posted

July 28, 2010

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion

September 1, 2018

Study Completion

September 1, 2018

Last Updated

April 17, 2020

Results First Posted

April 17, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-04

Locations