Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve
TRITON
1 other identifier
interventional
295
2 countries
6
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to confirm that the safety and performance of the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2010
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2010
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 17, 2020
CompletedSeptember 1, 2023
August 1, 2023
7.9 years
August 5, 2011
January 15, 2020
August 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percent of Early Adverse Events
Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the total number of enrolled subjects times 100.
Events occuring within 30 days of procedure
Percent of Late Adverse Events
Number of late adverse events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
Other Outcomes (15)
Number of Subject's With Device Technical Success
At time of surgery, an average of 3 hours
Number of Subject's With Procedural Success
Discharge(an average of 13 days) or 10 days post-implant, whichever comes first
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline
1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
- +12 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Study Valve
OTHERSubjects act as own control
Interventions
Aortic Valve bioprosthesis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Aortic stenosis or stenosis-insufficiency of aortic valve requiring a planned replacement as indicated in the preoperative evaluation;
- Scheduled to undergo planned aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary bypass surgery, MAZE procedure, septal myectomy, pacemaker/ICD implant and or atrial appendage occlusion/removal.
- Signed and dated the informed consent form prior to investigation procedures;
- Geographically stable and agrees to attend Follow up assessments at the hospital of surgical services for a maximum of 5 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Pure aortic insufficiency
- Requires emergency surgery
- Aneurysm of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta requiring surgical intervention
- Left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 25%
- Active endocarditis within 3 months prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
- Concomitant valve (mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic) disease requiring repair with an annuloplasty ring or replacement with prosthesis
- Prior mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve, mechanical valve, or annuloplasty ring.
- Myocardial infarction (MI) within 1 month prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
- Previously implanted with EDWARDS INTUITY Aortic valve; alcohol or drug abuser
- Disease limiting life expectancy to less than 12 months
- Pregnant or lactating
- Currently participating in another drug or device clinical investigation;
- Documented blood diatheses
- Requires non-cardiac procedures such as carotid procedures or mediastinal tumor removal
- Had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6-months prior to scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
AKH Vienna-Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien; University Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Kerchoff Klinik-Bad Nauheim
Bad Nauheim, 61231, Germany
Herzzentrum Uniklink Koln-Klinik und Poliklinik fur Herz und Thoraxzchirurgie
Cologne, 50937, Germany
MHH-Medizinische Hoschschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625, Germany
University Leipzig: Herzzentrum Leipzig Gmbh
Leipzig, 04289, Germany
Klinikum der Universitat Muchen-Grosshadern; Clinic at the University of Munich
Munich, 81377, Germany
Related Publications (5)
Laufer G, Haverich A, Andreas M, Mohr FW, Walther T, Shrestha M, Rahmanian P, Holzhey D, Roth M, Schmitz C, Schramm R, Giot C, Wahlers TCW. Long-term outcomes of a rapid deployment aortic valve: data up to 5 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):281-287. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx103.
PMID: 28453629RESULTHaverich A, Wahlers TC, Borger MA, Shrestha M, Kocher AA, Walther T, Roth M, Misfeld M, Mohr FW, Kempfert J, Dohmen PM, Schmitz C, Rahmanian P, Wiedemann D, Duhay FG, Laufer G. Three-year hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, and prosthetic-patient mismatch after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in 287 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.049. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PMID: 25218544RESULTKocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A, Shrestha M, Walther T, Misfeld M, Kempfert J, Gillam L, Schmitz C, Wahlers TC, Wippermann J, Mohr FW, Roth M, Skwara A, Rahmanian P, Wiedemann D, Borger MA. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
PMID: 23058665RESULTWahlers TCW, Andreas M, Rahmanian P, Candolfi P, Zemanova B, Giot C, Ferrari E, Laufer G. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):177-183. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000509.
PMID: 29912142RESULTAlaklabi AM, Abdul Rab S, Sabbah BN, Maklad AE, Dokollari A, Van den Eynde J, Pompeu Sa M, Arjomandi Rad A, Ahsan MR, Fatehi Hassanabad A. Innovations in Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comprehensive Overview of the Intuity Rapid Deployment Valve. Cardiol Rev. 2026 Jan-Feb 01;34(1):30-39. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000657. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
PMID: 38334371DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andrey Nersesov, Sr. Director of Clinical Affairs, Surgical Structural Heart
- Organization
- Edwards Lifesciences, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Prof Axel Haverich
MHH Hannover
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2011
First Posted
October 3, 2011
Study Start
January 1, 2010
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
September 1, 2023
Results First Posted
February 17, 2020
Record last verified: 2023-08