NCT01126749

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Bladder Cancer who receive Eribulin Mesylate Administered in Combination with Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Alone as First-Line Therapy is safety and tolerable when administered to patients with locally advanced or metastatic bladder cancer and to gain preliminary data on whether patients may benefit from this combination.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
92

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_1

Geographic Reach
6 countries

42 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 16, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 17, 2010

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 20, 2010

Completed
5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 8, 2015

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 20, 2016

Completed
5.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 28, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

February 28, 2022

Status Verified

January 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

May 17, 2010

Results QC Date

February 3, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 3, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Locally Advanced or Metastatic Bladder Cancer, including other transitional cell cancers of the urothelium (prostate, urethra, ureter, and renal pelvis)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) as Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0

    DLTs were clinically significant adverse events within 21 days of treatment judged by investigator at least possibly related to treatment. This included greater than or equal to (\>=) Grade 3 (G3) peripheral neuropathy, \>=G3 nausea and vomiting despite optimal anti-emetic treatment, any other non-hematologic toxicity of \>=G3 (except alopecia, single abnormal laboratory values the Investigator judged unlikely related to study therapy, had no clinical correlate, and resolved within 7 days, and hypersensitivity reaction to any of the compounds), Grade 4 neutropenia lasting over 7 days, febrile neutropenia (defined as fever \>=38.5 degrees Celsius with absolute neutrophil count below 1.0\*10\^9 per liter, G3 thrombocytopenia with nontraumatic bleeding (without therapeutic systemic anticoagulation) requiring platelet transfusion, Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (with or without nontraumatic bleeding), any study drug-related death, any other toxicity the dose escalation committee believed to be DLT.

    Cycle 1 (Cycle length=21 days)

  • Phase 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    TEAE was defined as an adverse event that had an onset date, or a worsening in severity on or after the first dose of study drug up to the end of the study. Number of participants with TEAEs were reported based on safety assessments of laboratory tests, physical examination, examining bowel movements, regular measurement of vital signs, eastern cooperative oncology group-performance status and electrocardiogram parameter values. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death; life threatening required inpatient hospitalization; resulted in persistent, significant disability; was congenital anomaly/birth defect or medically important due to other reasons than mentioned criteria. Number of participants with TEAEs and SAEs were reported.

    From the first dose of study drug up to approximately 6 years 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

    From the date of randomization until the earlier of the following two events: the date of PD or the date of death (Up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

  • Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

    From the date of randomization until CR or PR (Up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

  • Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Progression-free Survival at Week 12

    Week 12

  • Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)

    From the date of randomization until the date of PD (Up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

  • Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

    From the date of randomization until the date of death (Up to approximately 6 years 3 months)

Study Arms (2)

E7389 in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: GemcitabineDrug: E7389Drug: Cisplatin

gemcitabine plus cisplatin

EXPERIMENTAL
Drug: GemcitabineDrug: Cisplatin

Interventions

Gemcitabine

E7389 in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatingemcitabine plus cisplatin
E7389DRUG

E7389

Also known as: Eribulin Mesylate
E7389 in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin

Cisplatin

E7389 in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatingemcitabine plus cisplatin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients may be entered in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:
  • Male or female patient greater than 18 years of age;
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced Stage 4 (eg, T4b) or metastatic transitional cell cancer of the bladder; including other transitional cell cancers of the urothelium (prostate, urethra, ureter, and renal pelvis)
  • Not previously treated with systemic chemotherapy for metastatic bladder cancer (one regimen of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy is permitted). Patients must have a disease-free interval of 6 months after adjuvant therapy;
  • At least 1 site of measurable disease by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST version 1.1) guidelines;
  • Life expectancy of greater than or equal to 3 months;
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1;
  • Patients must have active bowel function defined as at least 3 bowel movements per week according to subject history and must be willing to maintain a diary of bowel function prior to dosing and continuing through completion of study treatment. Laxatives may be used to maintain adequate bowel function;
  • Patients must have adequate renal function as evidenced by calculated creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 55 mL/min per the Cockcroft and Gault formula;
  • Patients must have adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10\^9/L, hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10.0 g/dL (a hemoglobin less than 10.0 g/dL at Screening is acceptable if it is corrected to greater than or equal to 10.0 g/dL by growth factor or transfusion prior to first dose), and platelet count greater than or equal to 100 x 10\^9/L;
  • Patients must have adequate liver function as evidenced by bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN), and alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than or equal to 3 x ULN (in the case of liver metastases, less than or equal to 5 x ULN). If there are bone metastases, liver-specific alkaline phosphatase may be separated from the total and used to assess liver function instead of total alkaline phosphatase;
  • Male or female patients of child-producing potential must agree to use double barrier contraception, oral contraceptives, or avoidance of pregnancy measures during the study and for 90 days after the last day of treatment;
  • Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening;
  • Females may not be breastfeeding;
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients will not be entered in the study for any of the following reasons:
  • Prior treatment with epothilone, ixabepilone, patupilone, vinflunine, halichondrin B, and/or halichondrin B chemical derivatives;
  • History of other malignancies except: (1) adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin; (2) curatively treated, a) in situ carcinoma of the uterine cervix, or b) prostate cancer, or c) superficial bladder cancer; or (3) other curatively treated solid tumor with no evidence of disease for greater than or equal to 3 years;
  • Presence of brain metastases, unless the patient has received adequate treatment at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, and is stable, asymptomatic, and off steroids for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization;
  • Received an investigational agent, chemotherapy, biological therapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, or radiotherapy within 30 days prior to commencing study treatment, or have not recovered from all treatment-related toxicities to Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade less than or equal to 1, except for alopecia;
  • Are currently receiving an investigational agent or any other systemic anticancer treatment, including palliative radiotherapy;
  • Significant cardiovascular impairment (history of congestive heart failure New York Heart Association \[NYHA\] Grade greater than 2, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, or serious cardiac arrhythmia);
  • Subjects with a high probability of Long QT Syndrome;
  • Patients with organ allografts requiring immunosuppression;
  • Known active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B, virus (HBV) or hepatitis C; virus (HCV);
  • Hypersensitivity to halichondrin B and/or halichondrin B chemical derivative
  • Prior pelvic radiation;
  • History of known or suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis with risk of bleeding or perforation, or intraluminal or serosal metastatic lesions with risk of bleeding or perforation of any lesions;
  • History of abdominal adhesions, fistula, diverticulitis, gastrointestinal perforation, intra-abdominal abscess, documented peptic ulcer disease (active gastroesophageal reflux disease/dyspepsia are allowed), or other gastrointestinal conditions with increased risk of perforation;
  • Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (CTCAE v.4.0) Grade greater than or equal to 2 constipation;
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (42)

Unknown Facility

Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tucson, Arizona, 85715, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Myers, Florida, 33916, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

East Orange, New Jersey, 7018, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Rochester, New York, 55904, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, 77024, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Webster, Texas, 77598, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Huntington, Virginia, 25704, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Northfork, West Virginia, 23502, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Aachen Northwest, 52074, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Berlin, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Essen, Northwest, 45136, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Goch, Northwest, 47574, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Hamburg, HH, 20246, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Tuebingen, BW, 72076, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Wiesbaden, HE, 65191, Germany

Location

Unknown Facility

Maastricht, 6229, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Nieuwegein, 3435, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Nijmegen, 6525, Netherlands

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, 8003, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Barcelona, 8025, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Elche- Alicante, 3203, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, 28034, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, 28040, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Madrid, 28050, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Sabadell, 8208, Spain

Location

Unknown Facility

Dnipropetrovsk, 49005, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Dnipropetrovsk, 49102, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Donetsk, 83092, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kharkiv, 61037, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Kyiv, 3022, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Lviv, 79031, Ukraine

Location

Unknown Facility

Leicester, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Liverpool, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

London, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

Unknown Facility

Southampton, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Interventions

GemcitabineeribulinCisplatin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heterocyclic CompoundsDeoxycytidineCytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsNitrogen CompoundsPlatinum Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

Due to the lack of a clear definition for PFS censoring rules and deviation from the statistical analysis plan relating to interim analyses, the PFS analysis was deemed unreliable and therefore data was not collected and reported.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Eisai Medical Information
Organization
Eisai Inc.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2010

First Posted

May 20, 2010

Study Start

April 16, 2010

Primary Completion

May 8, 2015

Study Completion

July 20, 2016

Last Updated

February 28, 2022

Results First Posted

February 28, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-01

Locations