Pilot Evaluation of Closed Loop Ventilation and Oxygen Controller
CLOSER1
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study compares automated settings (Intellivent) with protocolized settings of the ventilator after cardiac surgery. The settings concern the respiratory rate, the inspiratory and expiratory pressure and FiO2. The aim of the study is to demonstrate that automated settings are feasible and safe. The study design is a randomized controled study. 30 patients will be ventilated with automated mode and 30 patients with protocolized settings after cardiac surgery. The hypothesis is that the automated mode allows a safer ventilation with better maintain of the patient in predefined optimal zone of ventilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2010
CompletedFebruary 25, 2014
February 1, 2014
5 months
March 18, 2010
February 24, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
" not acceptable " zone of ventilation
Number of episodes, duration and percentage of time in the " not acceptable " zone of ventilation as pre-defined
During the four hours of the study protocol
" not acceptable " zone of ventilation
Number of episodes, duration and percentage of time in the " not acceptable " zone of ventilation as pre-defined
During the 4 hours of the protocol
Study Arms (2)
Automated settings
EXPERIMENTALVentilator settings automatically adjusted by the evaluated system, concerning the FiO2, the respiratory rate, the inspiratory and expiratory pressures and related settings (triggers, pressurization ramp, inspiratory/expiratory time...)
protocolized settings
ACTIVE COMPARATORVentilator settings performed by the local respiratory therapists according to the local protocols
Interventions
Automated settings (respiratory rate \[RR\], FiO2, Insp and exp pressures) Ventilator settings automatically adjusted by the evaluated system, concerning the FiO2, the respiratory rate, the inspiratory and expiratory pressures and related settings (triggers, pressurization ramp, inspiratory/expiratory time...)
Mechanical ventilation settings performed by the respiratory therapists according to the local protocols
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Unexpected surgical procedure
- Major complication during surgery
- Early extubation expected (\< 1 hour)
- Broncho-pleural fistula
- Study ventilator not available
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Laval Universitylead
Related Publications (1)
Lellouche F, Bouchard PA, Simard S, L'Her E, Wysocki M. Evaluation of fully automated ventilation: a randomized controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Mar;39(3):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2799-2. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PMID: 23338569DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professeur
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2010
First Posted
March 19, 2010
Study Start
July 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
February 25, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02